Constellation Brands Inc (STZ) 2016 Q4 法說會逐字稿

Welcome to the Constellation Brands fourth-quarter and full-year 2016 earnings conference call.

(Operator Instructions)

I'll now turn the call over to Patty Yahn-Urlaub, Vice President of Investor Relations.

Please go ahead.

Thank you, Laurie.

Good morning, everyone, and welcome to Constellation's fourth-quarter and FY16 end conference call.

I'm here this morning with Rob Sands, our President and Chief Executive Officer, and David Klein, our CFO.

This call complements our news release, which has also been furnished to the SEC.

During this call, we may discuss financial information on a GAAP, comparable, organic and constant-currency basis; however, discussions will generally focus on comparable financial results.

Reconciliations between the most directly comparable GAAP measure, and these and other non-GAAP financial measures, are included in the news release or otherwise available on the Company's website at www.cbrands.com.

Please also be aware that we may make forward-looking statements during this call.

While those statements represent our best estimates and expectations, actual results could differ materially from our estimates and expectations.

For a detailed list of risk factors that may impact the Company's estimates, please refer to the news releases and Constellation's SEC filings.

As usual, I would like to limit everybody to two questions today, so that we can end the call on time.

Thank you, and now I'd like to turn the call over to Rob.

Thanks, Patty.

Good morning, and welcome to our year-end call.

Now, before I begin the review of our accomplishments for FY16 and our plans for the coming year, I'd like to focus on the new initiatives disclosed within the press release issued earlier today.

First, we announced that we are evaluating the merits of executing an IPO for a portion of our Canadian business.

The consideration of this strategic action is the result of our ongoing efforts to identify value-enhancing opportunities for our shareholders, and to strengthen the financial profile of our overall wine and spirits businesses.

As we continue to transform the Company, the focus and resources we've put behind strategic initiatives to support sustainable, value-generating, long-term growth are also evolving.

This effort would provide better visibility to the Canadian business, which delivered excellent financial performance in 2016.

Our Canadian business has a strong leadership team, with extensive knowledge of the Canadian market.

They market and sell a winning portfolio of brands, and have a proven track record of successful innovation and new product development that resonates with Canadian consumers.

Their size and scale across Canada includes eight wineries in key wine regions, approximately 1,700 acres of Canadian vineyards, and a network of growers to support their Canadian-produced brands.

And they are the largest holder of independent retail licenses in Ontario, with more than 160 wine rack stores.

We are in the early process of evaluating an IPO of this business, and we plan to make a final decision later this calendar year, depending on market conditions.

If an IPO is completed, the proceeds are expected to be used to manage debt and our other capital allocation priorities.

This morning, we also announced our plans to acquire The Prisoner Wine Company brands, a super-luxury portfolio of five highly rated wines, led by the largest brand, The Prisoner.

Its other brands include Saldo, Cuttings, Blindfold and Thorn, with overall volume for the portfolio reaching 175,000 cases in calendar 2015.

The Prisoner is currently the number-one super-luxury red blend, growing at almost 30% in IRI channels at the $40 retail price point.

Now, similar to the Meiomi wine brand acquisition, the Prisoner acquisition aligns with our portfolio premiumization strategy and enables us to capitalize on US market trends that favor high-end wine brands with accretive margin profiles.

In particular, it strengthens our position in the dynamic and margin-enhancing super-luxury wine category, and can be easily integrated into our existing portfolio of brands.

So, now let's turn our attention to some of our key achievements for the past year, and great initiatives we have under way for FY17.

Overall, I am pleased with the significant accomplishments and the impressive financial results we achieved in FY16.

This past summer, we purchased the Meiomi wine brand, which is currently the fastest growing major brand in IRI channels in the $20 luxury price point.

The brand delivered depletion growth of almost 60% in FY16, a trend which has accelerated since we first acquired the brand last summer.

Its excellent margin profile is one of the contributing drivers of the margin expansion for the wine and spirits business in FY16.

Meiomi Pinot Noir was one of the hottest wines of the year, listed as number 20 in the Wine Spectator's Top 100 for 2015, and number 1 -- that's good -- on wine.com's Top 100 list, which is based entirely on consumer preferences.

We believe the brand has plenty of room to continue driving healthy growth for our Business.

Last fall, we entered the craft beer market with the purchase of Ballast Point, one of the most awarded major craft breweries in the industry.

Ballast Point provides a high-growth premium platform that is enabling Constellation to compete in the fast-growing craft beer segment, further strengthening our position in the high end of the US beer market.

In calendar 2015, Ballast Point posted depletion growth of more than 130%, and sold nearly 4 million cases.

This phenomenal level of growth is approximately 3 times that of any major competitor.

Operationally, we selected a site, and secured the land, to construct a new state-of-the-art brewery in Mexicali, Mexico.

Initially this brewery will we built to operate at 10 million hectoliters of production capacity, with potential scalability to 20 million hectoliters.

And it will have similar technology and operational advancements as our Nava brewery.

And speaking of Nava, we successfully completed our first incremental 5 million hectoliter capacity expansion as planned by year-end calendar 2015, and we are progressing with our plans to build out Nava to 27.5 million hectoliters by early calendar 2018.

Now, these investments in Mexicali and Nava will ensure that we have the capacity, quality, control and flexibility to meet expected demand for our iconic beer brands well into the future, and position us to capture the continued momentum and growth opportunities we see in the high end of the US beer market.

Organizationally, we made key management changes across the Business, strengthening the Organization by fostering the continued growth and development of our people, while ensuring continuity to build upon our current success and drive the Company's long-term growth strategies.

Collectively, these accomplishments, in conjunction with our excellent business performance, have helped to drive the appreciation of our stock, which remains one of the best performing stocks in the S&P 500 Index.

Now, let's move now to excellent business performance I just referenced as a critical component to our success.

We'll start with the Constellation Brands beer business, which was the number-one contributor to growth in the total US beer category last year for the third consecutive year, with most of our brands in the Mexican import portfolio posting record volumes in 2016.

And Constellation was the leader and the number-one share gainer in the high-end segment of the US beer market in calendar 2015.

More remarkably, our beer business growth has accelerated every year since 2010, with depletion trends exceeding 12% in FY16.

I'd like to take a minute to share some of this past year's amazing accomplishments for our iconic beer brands, and highlight the key initiatives we plan to execute during FY17 in order to maintain this excellent momentum.

Let's begin with the clear heavyweights in our portfolio, Corona Extra and Modelo Especial.

These brands are two of the hottest brands in the industry, and delivered 25% of US beer category industry growth last year.

Our flagship Corona Extra brand has been the number-one imported beer brand for almost 20 years, and today is the number-five beer brand overall in the US industry.

This brand sold more than 117 million cases in FY16, growing depletions almost 10% versus the prior year.

This growth occurred across the country, as Corona Extra grew share in 49 out of 50 states, and was the only top five US beer brand to grow share for the year.

Corona Extra growth has been accelerating over the last five years, with the can launch accounting for about one-third of the growth in FY16.

The remainder of the phenomenal growth came from the increased distribution and velocity of the iconic Corona Extra bottles.

In FY17, we expect to increase our media investment in Corona Extra, while focusing the dollars against key time periods that include the NBA Finals and our 120 days of summer, in order to maintain our leadership position during our most important selling season.

We also plan to increase our digital investments, as we saw great success with the brand's social media activities last year.

We believe there remains tremendous growth opportunity in Corona Extra cans, as depletions for this format increased more than 100% in FY16, but currently represent less than 6% of total brand volume.

As such, we are investing more behind Corona cans to generate incremental awareness and consumer demand.

You'll see a heavy media presence leading into key can holidays, including Memorial Day, July 4, and Labor Day.

Now, moving to Modelo Especial, this brand is stronger than ever as the fastest growing major beer brand in America.

Last year, the brand grew depletions more than 19% to surpass 70 million cases and $1 billion in sales.

As a result, Modelo Especial was the number-one dollar share gainer and is now ranked as the number-eight beer overall in the US market in total dollar sales, up from the number-nine position last year.

The size of this brand has doubled in just five short years, and a goal is to keep this momentum going.

In FY17, our biggest opportunity for this brand lies in expanding distribution, because despite being the number-two import, Modelo currently has less than 50% distribution on most packages.

We also see tremendous opportunity for this brand in the on-premise channel, where Modelo Especial increased more than 20% last year, with the draft format increasing almost 50%.

Yet only about 30% of on-premise locations across the US carry Modelo Especial today.

So, we are focused on closing that distribution gap and increasing the momentum.

Now, for the sixth consecutive year, we are increasing our Modelo Especial investment in national, Spanish language TV, and digital, and we will be running new TV advertising throughout the entire year, increasing our spend on live sports by 50% and investing in heavily visible soccer broadcast properties.

In addition, we are increasing our general market media by almost 40% across national TV and digital, with high-profile placements during the NBA playoffs and key NFL match-ups.

Together, we expect these initiatives to position Modelo Especial for another great year of stellar growth.

I also want to call out Corona Light, which remains the number-one imported light beer by a large margin.

Depletion growth on this brand has accelerated every year for the last five years, with depletions growing almost 8% in FY16.

In FY17, we plan to build on the already successful Light Cerveza campaign with a new TV advertisement which will begin airing nationally this month.

We have also added high-profile live spots during NHL playoff broadcasts this spring, and sponsorships of national Major League Baseball games on ESPN during the key summer holidays.

This will be supplemented with an investment in social media.

We are also expanding Corona Light draft by launching with several additional distributors.

The Corona Light can will continue to be a big point of emphasis, as depletions for this format increased more than 40% in FY16.

As you are aware, the bench strength of our beer portfolio goes deeper than our biggest brands.

Part of what makes our collection of brands so powerful is the long-term potential of our smaller brands like Victoria and Pacifico that are currently outpacing category growth.

And let's not forget about Ballast Point, a brewer known for unbridled innovation and outstanding quality, and one that gives our beer portfolio a leading position in the craft space that can be built upon in several ways.

This year is to expand the Ballast Point distribution nationally, making it available in all 50 states.

This, along with successful new product launches, is expected to drive the strong double-digit growth we are targeting in FY17.

Overall, I am excited about the growth prospects for our beer business in FY17.

As you can see, we have tremendous opportunity to grow the Business organically through enhanced distribution and execution opportunities across the portfolio.

As a result, we are targeting both net sales growth and operating income growth in the 14% to 17% range for our beer business in FY17, including the benefits from Ballast Point.

From a brewery and operational perspective, in FY16 we achieved our key Nava brewery performance goals for capacity utilization, quality and cost.

All areas of the brewery expansion are well under way, with overall project on schedule to be completed on time and within our budget.

As we begin FY17, we will be intensely focused on the continued expansion of the Nava brewery to 20 million hectoliters.

This capacity is expected to become fully operational within the next few months.

As a matter of fact, we've already begun to run test brews, and have all new packaging lines up and running in test mode to support this 20 million hectoliters of capacity.

Now, over the next few months we will continue to fine tune all the components necessary to successfully achieve this important milestone as planned.

Within our existing capacity, we recently made our first brew of Modelo Especial Chelada at Nava with excellent results.

With that accomplishment complete, we have now made brews of all of our products at this brewery.

And, as many of you are aware, our third phase of expansion to 25 million hectoliters is our next critical milestone, and I am pleased to report that this work is proceeding as scheduled.

I am proud of the fact that Nava is the newest and most advanced state-of-the-art brewery in the world, and that our brewery team's capabilities and commitment to quality are unparalleled.

These best-in-class credentials are what we plan to bring to our new Mexicali brewery.

Mexicali is the ideal site for a sister brewery to Nava.

The technology and skilled expertise we plan to put in place are designed to ensure the highest quality and consistency for our consumers, and we will continue to update you on the progress there.

And now I'd like to focus on the operational results for our wine and spirits business.

During FY16, we delivered overall earnings growth and margin expansion for our wine and spirits business.

Our spirits portfolio produced solid results, and our Canadian wine business exceeded its financial goals while outperforming the industry and growing market share for the year.

Sales growth in the US benefited from organic volume growth and positive mix trends.

We delivered exceptional results for our focus brands, which grew depletions 5% for the year, and we are reaping the benefits of our targeted investments in these brands.

As a matter of fact, many of our focus brands were included in our list of significant milestones and accomplishments for our overall wine and spirits portfolio for FY16.

Seven of our brands were featured on Impact's annual Hot Brand list for wine and spirits, including Meiomi, which recently surpassed our very own Mark West as IRI's largest pinot noir for the current 12- and 52-week periods; and Kim Crawford recently emerged as the number-one sauvignon blanc in IRI channels.

Our products were also called out in the Beverage Information Group's 2015 awards, in which four of our brands achieved Fast Track status, recognizing their impressive growth.

Three were named Rising Stars, including one of our newest brands, Tom Gore Vineyards.

And six were listed as established growth brands, such as Mark West, Ruffino, SIMI, and Woodbridge by Robert Mondavi.

The Beverage Information Group also recognized SVEDKA Vodka as a spirits growth brand, which this year achieved its place as the number-one imported vodka in the entire US.

We plan to continue building on the success of some of our most recent new brands and line extensions to capitalize on the hottest trends in the market.

Our newest red blend, Ravage, is a dark fruit-forward red blend with structure and depth that has resonated well with consumers, and will go national in September.

Ravage Cabernet Sauvignon performed very well during our exclusive testing period with a major retailer throughout last year, and we are pleased to expand the brand to wider distribution this spring.

We will also continue to support the growth of Tom Gore Vineyards, the farmer's wine, that meets consumers' desire to know the people and places behind the products they choose.

Some of our existing new line extensions include our Robert Mondavi Private Selection Bourbon Barrel-Aged Cabernet, which boasts an impressively rich profile that comes from a unique aging process in bourbon barrels; and Ruffino's Sparkling Rose, which expects to capitalize on the success of our Ruffino Prosecco and the growing consumer taste for imported rose wines.

For the year, our spirits portfolio posted solid net sales growth of 6%, driven by the continued success of our flavor introductions for Paul Masson Grande Amber Brandy, as well as SVEDKA vodka.

Casa Noble almost doubled net sales this past year, and tripled distribution in terms of number of accounts.

We are upbeat about the future growth trajectory of this brand.

In fact, we are putting resources behind Casa Noble to support what we believe is a compelling growth opportunity.

Some of these investments include fresh packaging, a new marketing campaign, and continued cross-promotion with Corona Extra during the Cinco de Mayo holiday season.

Our marketing campaign, The Noble Pursuit, features digital spots that highlight the quality and heritage unique to this fine tequila.

We also plan to continue supporting our number-one imported vodka, SVEDKA, with a new addition to our lineup of flavors, cucumber lime.

SVEDKA has been very successful in launching highly targeted unique flavors that stand out from the vast options on the shelf today, and has proven it knows how to win in this space.

We think cucumber lime will be a great addition to the track record of success, and the initial consumer response supports our optimism.

From a strategic perspective in FY17, our goal for the wine and spirits business is to grow profits ahead of sales, and improve margins, which is reflected in our 2017 wine and spirits guidance of mid-single-digit sales growth and mid- to high-single digits profit growth for the year.

So, what will be the enablers of this goal?

We plan to capitalize on the market-leading growth of our recent high-growth, margin-enhancing wine acquisitions, Meiomi and The Prisoner.

We will continue our targeted approach to investing in a subset of our focus brands in order to drive key brands that have scale, higher margin, and the greatest growth potential.

We remain committed to mix and margin-accretive innovation and new product development, and have several new products in the hopper, a few of which I just mentioned.

And for the third consecutive year, we plan to execute price increases for select products within the portfolio.

And finally, we plan to continue to optimize COGS through global blend management initiatives, productivity improvements, and lower grape costs.

Overall, we are committing people, technology and resources to work with our wholesalers and retailers to execute growth for our wine and spirits business.

In closing, it has certainly been another exciting year at Constellation.

Our achievements are many, and have driven a year of strong financial performance.

In FY16, we delivered industry-leading market results for our beer business, while continuing to enhance our operational platform in Mexico to support the growth of our iconic Mexican beer brands.

Within our wine and spirits business, we maintained our focus on premiumization, innovation and brand building, which drove enhanced margins and earnings growth.

We are very proud to have delivered another rewarding year of value to our shareholders, and I am pleased that our results can support a significant dividend increase in the coming year.

Overall, we remain committed to challenging ourselves in order to optimize the business opportunities that lie ahead.

With that, I would now like to turn the floor over to David Klein who will review our financial results for FY16 and the outlook for FY17.

Thank you, Rob.

Good morning, everyone.

FY16 was another very exciting year, with strong financial performance in which we generated over $6.5 billion of net sales and 9% net sales growth.

We expanded operating margins in both businesses, and improved our consolidated comparable-basis operating margin by more than 200 basis points.

We increased consolidated EBIT 18% and comparable-basis diluted EPS 22%, and we produced $1.4 billion of operating cash flow, an increase of 31%.

The strong earnings and operating cash flow growth helped our net-debt-to-comparable-basis-EBITDA ratio finish at 3.8 times, even as we made significant capital investments in our Mexican operations, acquired Meiomi and Ballast Point, and returned cash to shareholders with the initiation of a dividend and the repurchase of stock.

We expect FY17 to be another strong year, as we are targeting healthy net sales, EBIT, operating cash flow and EPS growth, while we continue to invest in our world-class Mexican beer operating platform and increase our dividend per share by 29%.

Given those highlights, let's look at FY16 performance in more detail, where my comments will generally focus on comparable-basis financial results.

Consolidated net sales on an organic constant-currency basis grew 8% for the year.

We continue to see robust marketplace momentum for our beer business, with depletion growth coming in over 12%.

Organic beer net sales increased 13% on organic volume growth of 11%.

Ballast Point added $27 million of sales since joining our beer portfolio in mid-December.

Wine and spirits net sales on an organic constant-currency basis increased 3%.

This primarily reflects volume growth and favorable mix.

As mentioned by Rob, Meiomi continues to demonstrate excellent marketplace momentum, as the brand generated $74 million of incremental sales since joining the portfolio last August.

For the year, consolidated gross profit increased $373 million, up 14%, with gross margin increasing 220 basis points.

Beer gross profit increased $310 million, primarily due to volume growth, favorable pricing and lower COGS, and our beer gross profit margin increased 300 basis points to 49%.

Wine and spirits gross profit was up $63 million.

This primarily reflects the benefits from the Meiomi acquisition and lower COGS.

Wine and spirits gross profit margin increased 90 basis points to 42.2%.

Consolidated SG&A increased $90 million.

This reflects marketing investments made primarily by the beer business.

Corporate expense was up, due primarily to higher incentive compensation expense, an increase in payroll taxes associated with employee stock option exercise activity, and investments to support the growth of our business, including the establishment of our Chief Growth Officer function.

Consolidated SG&A as a percentage of net sales remained constant at 17.5%.

We continue to expand margins across the Business, as consolidated operating income increased $283 million and consolidated operating margin improved 220 basis points.

Beer operating margin increased 300 basis points to 34.9%, and wine and spirits operating margin improved 110 basis points to 24.8%.

Equity earnings increased $5 million due largely to strong results for Opus One.

Interest expense for the year was $314 million, down 7%.

The decrease was primarily due to lower average interest rates.

At the end of February, our total debt was $8.1 billion.

When factoring in cash on hand, our net debt totaled $8 billion, an increase of $812 million since the end of FY15.

This primarily reflects funding for the Ballast Point and Meiomi acquisitions, partially offset by our free cash flow generation.

Our net-debt-to-comparable-basis-EBITDA leverage ratio came in at 3.8 times at the end of FY16 versus 4 times at the end of FY15.

Our FY16 ratio does not reflect a full-year EBITDA benefit for the Ballast Point and Meiomi acquisitions.

Our effective tax rate for the year came in at 29.6%, which was essentially even with last year.

Now let's briefly discuss Q4 results.

Comparable-basis diluted EPS came in at $1.19, up 16%.

EPS growth was impacted by our tax rate, as our Q4 rate was 29.8% versus a 23.2% rate in Q4 last year, which reflected the benefit of certain foreign tax credits.

Beer business results for the quarter finished strong, with organic net sales up 18%, on organic volume growth of 14%.

Net sales benefited from pricing and the overlap of certain sales adjustments recorded during the fourth quarter last year.

Beer depletions for the quarter grew 13%.

This factors in Ballast Point depletions since the transaction close date in mid-December and the corresponding period last year.

Ballast Point added a little under 1 percentage point to our Q4 depletion growth rate.

Beer operating income increased 29%, primarily due to organic volume growth, favorable pricing and lower COGS, partially offset by increased SG&A, largely attributed to higher marketing spend.

Wine and spirits organic net sales on a constant-currency basis were up 4% for the quarter, primarily due to volume growth.

Wine and spirits operating income increased 14%.

This reflected the benefit of the Meiomi acquisition, organic volume growth and lower COGS, partially offset by higher marketing spend.

Now let's review free cash flow, which we define as net cash provided by operating activities, less capital expenditures.

For FY16, we generated $522 million of free cash flow, compared to $362 million last year.

Operating cash flow totaled $1.4 billion versus $1.1 billion for the prior year.

This increase was primarily generated by the growth of the beer business.

CapEx for FY16 totaled $891 million compared to $719 million last year.

During the fourth quarter, we repurchased 246,000 shares of common stock for $34 million.

Rob provided highlights of our agreement to acquire The Prisoner Wine Company brands.

The cash paid at closing is expected to approximate $285 million.

The transaction is expected to close by the end of April, and to be $0.03 to $0.05 accretive to EPS for FY17.

This provides a good spot to move to our full-year FY17 P&L and free cash flow outlook.

We are projecting our comparable-basis diluted EPS to be in the range of $6.05 to $6.35.

Our comparable-basis guidance excludes comparable adjustments, which are detailed in the release.

The beer business is targeting net sales and operating income growth to be in the range of 14% to 17%.

This includes the anticipated incremental benefit from the Ballast Point acquisition.

We expect organic net sales and operating income growth to be in the 10% to 13% range.

Our projections include 1% to 2% anticipated pricing benefit for our Mexican portfolio.

We are pleased that our beer operating margin finished FY16 just under 35%, which came in line with our most recent guidance.

Our FY17 beer segment guidance has us targeting a flattish beer operating margin versus FY16.

In FY17, we expect to see positive operating margin benefits from product pricing, ongoing favorability from foreign currency and commodities, glass sourcing, and lower levels of finished goods purchased under the interim supply agreement with ABI.

And while we are pleased with our progress on our expansion activities at Nava, we still have much to accomplish, as we continue to bring online and optimize new capacity.

Given these activities, we will continue to see a ramp up in depreciation expense, line commissioning and optimization costs, and employee hiring.

These costs, along with marketing investments and the consolidation of Ballast Point, are essentially offsetting the margin benefits I just outlined.

Looking closer at depreciation and amortization expense for the beer segment, it totaled $62 million in FY16.

We expect that to increase by approximately 125% in FY17.

For the wine and spirits business, we expect net sales growth in the mid-single-digit range, and operating income growth in the mid- to high-single-digit range.

This includes the anticipated incremental benefit from the Meiomi and Prisoner acquisitions.

We expect organic net sales and operating income growth to be in the low- to mid-single-digit range, with operating income growth targeted to be ahead of sales growth, as we are forecasting some mix benefits.

In addition, we expect our interest expense to be in the range of $325 million to $335 million, our tax rate to approximate 29%, and our weighted average diluted shares outstanding to approximate 206 million.

This does not assume additional stock repurchases.

We expect FY17 free cash flow to be in the range of $250 million to $350 million.

This reflects operating cash flow in the range of $1.5 billion to $1.7 billion, and CapEx of $1.25 billion to $1.35 billion.

Based on the mid-point of our guidance, we are targeting double-digit growth in operating cash flow for FY17.

This benefit is being more than offset by the planned increase in capital expenditures, as our guidance includes approximately $1.1 billion to $1.2 billion related to our beer operational expansion projects in Mexico.

In the press release we issued this morning, we included an updated table summarizing the collective capital expenditure investments we are making in our Mexican operating platform and related timing.

Overall, there is no change to the total cost estimate related to these projects, and FY17 and FY18 still represent the peak spending periods for this activity.

We increased our quarterly dividend to $0.40 per share for Class A stock, and to $0.36 per share for Class B stock.

This represents a 29% increase in our dividend rate per share.

As a result, we expect approximately $320 million in dividend payments for FY17.

In closing, we are very pleased with our FY16 financial performance, and excited about the strong projected earnings and operating cash flow growth we are planning for FY17.

We continue to strengthen our financial profile, and have significant capital allocation flexibility, as we remain focused on operating in our targeted 3 to 4 times leverage range.

With that, we are happy to take your questions.

(Operator Instructions)

Your first question comes from the line of Dara Mohsenian of Morgan Stanley.

Hi, good morning.

I just wanted to flush out the reasoning for the potential Canadian wine IPO.

It's a small piece of corporate EBIT, so it seems like it won't have much direct valuation impact.

Is the motivation there more to potentially highlight the US line business as undervalued here, or are there other reasons behind it?

And any thoughts in general around the notion of going full monty and splitting up the entire wine and spirits business from beer down the road?

It would be helpful for any commentary there, thank you.

So the Canadian IPO is really, assuming that it occurs, intended to achieve a number of things.

Number one, we think that buried in the whole Company the wine and spirits division doesn't really get much visibility from a value perspective.

And if we treat it more as a standalone entity, the fact that it is a very high performing business in Canada will become a lot more visible.

That's number one; so we think that that will be positively reflected in its valuation and our valuation overall.

Number two, it's obviously also a capital allocation opportunity for us.

As I said an IPO of a part of the -- of Canadian business will enable us to continue to manage our debt and keep it at the levels that we think are optimal for the Company as we also embark on some of our other strategic initiatives that are driving our very positive results in the wine and spirits business.

Meiomi is an example, Prisoner is an example, our investments behind driving premiumisation in the portfolio with our other brands and our NPD initiatives.

So we see the Canadian IPO as helping us to potentially achieve a lot of positive things.

It is an interesting business, its got strong growth, we built an improved market share in Canada.

So we think that it represents in many respects a great standalone opportunity.

As far as its implications as to our strategy for the rest of the wine and spirits business, there really is no implication there.

The wine and spirits business -- our wine and spirits business remains very strong, as you've seen in the results.

We had fantastic leverage, P&L leverage in that business this year.

We had tremendous margin expansion in that business.

Even inclusive of Canada, which is a bit lower in margin than the overall business, we posted operating profit margin in the mid 20%s, which is fantastic for any business and any industry.

A mid 20%s operating profit margin was the kind of leverage and growth and EBIT that we're getting in that business.

So really no implications relative to the rest of the business, but we think that as I said as a standalone business it's a great opportunity from an investment point of view.

So that's basically the thinking there.

Okay, that's helpful.

And then on the beer margin side, the commentary made sense in terms of the puts and takes looking at the upcoming fiscal year, but it seems like some of those favorable items you mentioned like the glass efficiency, pricing, top line leverage, et cetera would be a lot bigger than some of the negatives that you mentioned, particularly given the strong gross margin momentum in Q4.

So is the flat guidance just conservatism with greater uncertainty than you would usually have with the Nava ramp up?

And can you give us a sense of some of the negatives you mentioned, like the Ballast SG&A, the higher marketing, and hiring?

Yes, so generally, Dara, first of all there are a lot of moving parts as it relates to a build up of our operating margin in the beer business, and in particular in the work being done at Nava.

So as we said for the last year really, we're going to see headwinds in margin expansion at Nava as a result of incremental depreciation expense, line commissioning costs, employee hiring, as we bring capacity on.

But we don't necessarily get the throughput through the facility.

I would say that while we also are benefiting from stepping away from the ISA with ABI, as you'll recall we did extend although at a lesser amount in terms of case volume, we extended the ISA with ABI which dampened some of the near term margin upside that we may have otherwise seen.

And then the last point really being Ballast Point.

Now in terms of craft performers, Ballast Point is probably one of the best performing crafts from a financial profile perspective, but it still is dilutive to our overall operating margin of our beer business.

Your next question comes from the line of Nik Modi of RBC Capital Markets.

Hi, good morning, this is Russ Miller on for Nik.

Could you more specifically compare the top line growth profiles of the US and Canadian wine businesses?

Russ, we're struggling to hear you actually.

I apologize.

I was just wondering for more color, if you could compare the top line growth between the US and Canadian wine businesses?

Compared to what, Russ?

Higher in Canada than in the US.

Okay.

And then as a follow up, what are some of the key areas of focus for Bill Newlands as he takes over leadership of the wine and spirits business?

Well, it's the things that have been driving and that drove the results this year.

He's got to continue to focus on those same things.

So it's all about premiumisation, it's about driving mix, it's about driving our higher margin brands and our newly acquired brands like Prisoner, like Meiomi, driving the organic growth of our really high margin focus brands, good examples being Kim Crawford.

That's number one.

NPD continues to be really important in the beverage alcohol business.

NPD is providing almost all of the growth across any category in wine, beer, and spirits.

Our beer business tends to be a little bit different than that because we happen to be in the main sweet spot of growth with our Mexican portfolio and our craft portfolio.

But continuing to drive that NPD pipeline is again one of his main strategic initiatives.

And as I said our new acquisitions, Meiomi, Mark West is only a few years old, Prisoner, these are all key to our premiumisation and strategy and driving mix.

And again, this is the sweet spot of growth in the beverage alcohol business.

So it's pretty straightforward, and then it's I'd say day-to-day bread and butter stuff.

COGS, control over COGS, costs and growth has been an important driver of our financial results there as well as other expense items in the P&L.

So he will continue to focus on those things as well.

Good news is that he's doing a really great job and we're extremely optimistic obviously given our guidance for next year that we'll continue to be very successful in those areas.

That's excellent.

Thank you very much.

Your next question comes from the line of Judy Hong of Goldman Sachs.

Thank you, good morning.

How are you, Judy?

So first on beer sales guidance for FY17, I guess historically, it seemed like you were a little bit more conservative at the outset of the year in terms of looking at the beer depletion.

And it looks like this time the 10% to 13% organic sales guidance for beer lapping some of the tougher comps in the back half seems actually not as conservative.

So just wanted to understand maybe a little bit more in terms of is it really the momentum behind all of your brand that you're seeing that gives you confidence?

How big a factor would continued distribution gains on the cans be really a factor in terms of driving that sales growth momentum in 2017 for your beer business?

Well Judy, I think that it's of the things you mentioned around beer growth, it's both of those things.

We think the brands continue to have very strong momentum.

We continue to see that even as we're into the new year in terms of IRI.

There is a lot of distribution gain activity or a lot of space we can gain in terms of distribution in the coming year.

We do expect continued growth of cans, and again, our objective remains to drive our canned volume up in aggregate into that mid-teens kind of range of total volume over time.

I do want to address your point around the level of conservatism in our guidance.

I would say that we've taken the same approach this year to guidance as we've used in the past.

We're trying to give our best estimate as to where we think the business will land on the year, and I think that's reflected in the numbers that we produced.

And again I think you do need to focus on the organic depletion number, which is -- or the organic net sales number, which is the 10% to 13% because I think combined with our 1% to 2% pricing guidance, you get to a fairly respectable but achievable volume number.

Got it, okay.

And then I guess the second question is around your capital allocation/acquisition strategy.

So it seems like maybe every quarter or maybe just more recently we're getting a bit more just in terms of some of these acquisitions.

Certainly in 2017, just given where your leverage level is, you also have a lot of dry powder in terms of continuing to either return cash to shareholders versus acquisitions.

So is there a big pipeline in terms of these potential acquisitions that you see across both high end and craft spirits and beer side of the business?

If those don't materialize would you be willing to return even more cash to shareholders in 2017?

And what's embedded in term of your guidance?

So I would say, Judy, we are seeking all the time to methodically and consistently drive shareholder value.

And so we look at all of the tools in the tool box that we have to do that and yes in some instances it's in acquisition like The Prisoner or Meiomi and I would say that early returns on Meiomi and Ballast Point are very positive.

From a shareholder return standpoint we expect to see the same results, from an execution standpoint, from The Prisoner transaction you can see that we do remain committed to returning cash to our shareholders as evidenced by a 29% increase in our dividend.

And we will continue to look at share repurchases when we can stay within our leverage, our targeted leverage rage, and we can be opportunistic in the market.

And remember that the guidance that we gave assuming 206 million shares outstanding assumes no additional share repurchases at this point.

Got it, okay.

Thank you.

Your next question comes from the line of Bryan Spillane of Bank of America.

Hi, good morning, everyone.

So first just a housekeeping question.

In terms of Prisoner, are you going to finance that with debt, with the revolver?

Or just how are you financing that?

That's a hard one because of the fundability of cash.

We will not be going to the market to borrow for specifically for The Prisoner.

We will take it off the revolver or cash on hand.

Okay.

And in terms of the accretion estimate that you gave, does that assume that you're just going to use cash in hand?

The accretion estimate assumes an average borrowing rate actually.

So I guess you could imply the revolver from that when you're doing your math.

Okay, thanks, that's helpful.

And then in terms of just the flow of beer shipments for FY17, given how fast the business is growing and the capacity constraints that you have, are we going to see maybe a different order pattern this year, where wholesalers are just going to build more inventory early in the season so that you take less -- take some pressure off the peak?

I don't think you'll see anything different from previous years because we've had this pressure if you'll recall for the last couple of years.

And we do a lot of work with our distributer partners to plan inventory levels so that we optimize our -- the freshness of our beer while making sure that we don't stock out at retail.

So I don't think you'll see a dramatic shift from where we've been in the past.

Just sneak one more in, just in terms of the Canadian partial IPO, had you considered or would you consider either just a tax free spend to shareholders and/or an outright sale?

Like why a partial IPO versus maybe some of the other options that might also create value?

Thanks.

Yes, because call it a middle of the road approach, right?

It gets us some and some.

The Canadian business is a great business.

It enables us to continue to have the Canadian business that they utilize it as distribution platform for our US brands.

On the other hand, it will create more transparency into the performance of this business and therefore we think that it will be positive from a valuation perspective.

And then of course there's the proceeds from the sale of a portion of the business, right?

Which as I said in my talk, will enable us to continue to manage our debt levels appropriately and fits very nicely into our overall capital allocation strategy to enable us to do the things that David was just talking about which includes some of our strategic initiatives as well as -- as David pointed out, methodically returning capital to shareholders in the form of dividend increases as well as share repurchases.

We did recommence our share repurchasing activity this quarter, and although we didn't include it in our guidance because we don't know what we're going to do necessarily because we act opportunistically there, it's certainly a major element of our capital allocation strategy as I said, to continue to return money to shareholders in both those matters, dividend increases and share repurchases.

So it all fits together pretty nicely without disassembling the business.

All right, thank you very much.

Your next question comes from the line of Vivien Azer of Cowen and Co.

Hi, good morning.

Just wanted to follow up on Bryan's question first please.

In terms of your inventory levels on the beer side, I was a little bit surprised actually not to see inventories build that back up given what happened in the third quarter.

So where are we in terms of your inventory levels right now?

Our inventory levels from a days on hand, right, which reflect year-over-year growth, our inventory levels from a days on hand standpoint are consistent with where we've been in previous years at this point in time.

And that's both within our network and at the distributors.

And is that a level that you're comfortable with, or would you like to see that come up a little bit given the momentum?

We're comfortable with that level.

Okay perfect, thank you.

My next question has to do with Ballast Point.

Can you comment at all on how much capacity there is, in particular at Miramar?

And I ask it because given the fast top line growth, while the business is dilutive today I suspect a lot of that has to do with the fact it's much more expensive to ship west to east than vice versa.

So how are you thinking longer term about incremental capacity and where would you put that?

So first of all I'll say that Miramar has capacity for about 10 million to 12 million cases, and then beyond that I think we've said in the past that, and Ballast Point has said this, Jim Buechler and his team have discussed looking for a location for an east coast brewery at some point in the future.

Is there any rationale to accelerating those plans to capture better margin given shipping rates?

This is Rob.

I would say that that was being heavily investigated and pursued even prior to the acquisition.

So the answer is that it is a strategic initiative as we speak.

Terrific, thank you very much.

Your next question comes from the line of Caroline Levy of CLSA.

Thanks so much, good morning.

A couple of questions; one, have you considered taking more pricing in beer given the capacity constraints and given the need to pull on the AB supply?

Look, our position on pricing, our strategy remains the same.

We really make our pricing decisions from a very granular perspective market by market, case by case, city by city.

I think fundamentally the answer to your question is that we don't necessarily see anything on the horizon that dictates that we should be taking a different approach to pricing than we have in the past.

It's going to be based on what we think the market will allow and our competitive position, and we wouldn't use pricing to slow down the business and potentially damage the health of the brands.

I can tell you that right now.

We believe the capacity necessary to meet the demand in the marketplace, but pricing is an important element of our growth strategy too.

So we're going to continue to take the very balanced approach that we've been taking in the past.

Got it, okay.

I know that you're looking to enforce some of your contracts a little more than you have in the past with distributors in terms of what kind of promotional spending they should do.

And I'm wondering as you build up your 10% to 13% organic growth how much is driven by expected better performance out of distributors?

And sort of separate but the same, what growth rate are you looking for for the Corona brand which had such an exceptional year last year.

Are you looking for high single digits still on Corona?

So in answer to your first question, there's a bit of a misnomer there.

We clarified some points in our distributor contracts and this and that recently.

We talked about that at our GNS, our goals network summit.

It's really I would say doesn't amount to much.

We're not, I wouldn't call it enforcing our contracts in a particularly different manner.

We continue to have the same approach with our distributors which is very much a partnership approach, okay?

Our proposition to our distributors is pretty simple which is like any smart business people, you should invest in the higher margin, higher growth parts of your business that can develop, that's going to drive your margins in your business for the future.

And we think that it's our portfolio that the squeaky wheel that ought to get that grease.

I mean it's really as simple as that.

And by the way, it's not a hard sell, okay?

They all get it.

They get it very easily and they can see it in their own financial results that the key in many respects to their future from any material perspective is in our portfolio.

Because the other large elements of their portfolio are flat to down.

So all of the action is in our brands and to some degree craft of course, which is -- we're playing in that as well.

So I don't think that there's anything particularly different going on with our distributor network.

We're not insisting upon different terms than we have in the past in any material sense.

And then your other question was product growth?

We don't really break that out, but needless to say we're getting very strong growth in Corona and we continue that growth -- continue to expect that growth to continue driven by the can, driven by continued execution in the marketplace, even for 100% or a really well distributed brand.

There remains to be distribution opportunity even for a brand like Corona when you look at the various SKUs and packs and this and that that we have.

It's not 100% distributed in that regard.

And then look, we're increasing our marketing activities ahead of the market very consciously because the most critical thing we have is to maintain the health of these brands.

Therefore we think that continuing to increase our share of voice in building these brands is important.

And then we also have great execution in that regard.

I think that our advertising and our marketing in general and our strategy there is really working.

So I mean I suppose you could be increasing bad advertising, which isn't going to get you anywhere, but we're increasing really, really good advertising that resonates with the consumer and we know that we get a fantastic return from this because we measure it.

That's great, thank you very much.

Thank you.

Your next question comes from the line of Tim Ramey of Pivotal.

Good morning, thanks.

Your cash tax rate continues to be really low, and there's some downward movement in the book tax rate.

I assume that's all timing differences on cash or tax depreciation, but if we think about the short-term two to three years out, how will those two numbers trend if you have any insight into that?

Or does book move towards cash or does cash move towards book, I assume?

Yes, so Tim, I think one of the issues that we wrestle with and you wrestle with and every corporation in America is wrestling with at the moment is all of the change that's happening both domestically and internationally from a tax policy perspective.

And so you can see the benefits that we've had in recent years from certain foreign tax credits as well as from the benefits of the tax treatment of stock option expense.

And so that has helped push our number down in recent years, right?

And then in terms of our cash versus book, I would say how that all resolves itself on an ongoing basis I think is going to depend upon the changes in overall tax policy.

I would say that we expect our cash taxes to remain in the low 20%s for the foreseeable future.

Just one other one on CapEx.

I'm assuming that 2017 is the peak CapEx year, but it's not super clear what 2018 should look like, and that's at least in the forecast horizon now.

I assume it's lower than 2017.

Can you give any clarity on that?

Yes, a little bit I would say that 2017 and 2018 as we said will continue to be about peak years.

It's hard to really say at this point how things will flow between say 2018 and 2019 versus 2017.

So other than 2017 and 2018 will be our heaviest year, I'm reluctant to give any further guidance.

Terrific, thanks for your help.

Sure.

Your next question comes from the line of Rob Ottenstein of Evercore.

Thank you very much and congratulations on a great quarter and a great year.

A couple of questions.

One, could you review for us your overall M&A strategy as it pertains between beer, spirits, and wine.

Is it primarily opportunistic?

Obviously there are strategic elements in terms of mix, but also is there any sense given that you are really the only total beverage alcohol play company in the US, longer term would you be looking for a more equal mix in terms of the businesses between beer, wine, and spirits?

Well, I think that the answer to your question is again some and some.

It is obviously opportunistic in that you can't necessarily predict that there's going to be a willing seller of the things that we would like to acquire at the price that we would like to acquire it.

So it is opportunistic in that regard.

It's also strategic in that clearly premiumisation is an important part of the strategy whether it's wine, beer, or spirits.

Margin enhancement is important to us as we look at various opportunities across the three segments, which goes back of course to the premiumisation element of the strategy.

And also obviously buying things that are in the right place at the right time is important to us.

You look at wine, and clearly all the big growth in wine right now is in these higher price points like The Prisoner.

You look at beer, it's almost the same in that it's better beer and higher price points that are driving that market.

I think Ballast Point is a great example of that.

I mean that's like at the highest end of the beer market and its got the fastest growth of any major craft brewer.

It's almost a little contradictory in the sense that it would be the highest price and have the highest growth, but that's what makes it as attractive as it is.

And then spirits is an interesting segment as well, and we made a couple of small acquisitions in the craft spirits space over the last 12 months.

One called the Crafthouse Cocktails where we bought a minority interest in a brand that we think has the potential to be a very fast growing high margin business, and then another bourbon brand recently again that we think has the potential to be high margin, high growth too.

But spirits I'd say is a little less developed from an opportunity point of view right now.

The global spirits brand picture, I don't necessarily see us really playing in that.

It's not of great interest.

It's a market that's somewhat under pressure even in the segments that are growing pretty well, i.e.

brown spirits and bourbon, but it's not really our sweet spot.

But craft spirits much like craft beers is pretty interesting, but much more developmental in that the craft spirits business is much less developed than the craft beer.

And the brands are even smaller, okay, than in craft beer.

But we look at that segment too.

I'd just add one other thing; our strategy is as it relates to capital allocation, acquisitions, really hasn't changed.

We're not on an acquisition vendor or anything to that effect.

We're going to continue to be highly strategic, look at opportunities as they arise as we always have.

Obviously our strategy has changed a lot over the years, now it's really about where we've taken advantage of opportunities.

It's about buying tuck in, high growth, high margin, easy to assimilate type opportunities.

So I guess as I said, the answer to your question is some and some.

It's strategic, but it's also opportunistic.

As we go forward here we intend to maintain more importantly our discipline on capital allocation, all of the things that we've said being a priority, reducing debt, returning dollars and value to shareholders, and making occasional strategic acquisitions as they come along, and maintaining our debt levels in that three range where we said.

That's great.

And in terms of the targeted leverage ratio, I think you've said 3.5% to 4%, given the outlook in terms of CapEx spending as well as your very strong cash flows, how -- for the right acquisition would you be willing to go much over four times in the next year or so?

We don't have any plans in that regard.

Thank you very much.

Your next question comes from the line of Bonnie Herzog of Wells Fargo.

Good morning.

Hi.

I just have a question on or a follow on question on beer pricing.

Clearly your net beer pricing was strong in Q4, and I was hoping you could drill down between how much was from rate versus brand mix versus channel mix?

And then assuming you saw positive channel mix, how much of that was driven by greater distribution in the high margin C-store channel?

Yes, Bonnie, most of the pricing benefits that we've seen are really just overall price across the portfolio, across markets.

And we would have expected it to be fairly heavy in the previous quarter because of the price increase that we implemented in October of this past year.

And then are you seeing increased penetration of the C-store channel?

I know that's been a focus of yours as an opportunity.

Yes, we continued to improve in that category.

Okay.

And then maybe one final quick question on your Tail brands.

I was just hoping you could give us a sense of how some of the Tail beer brands performed last year, and then how meaningful you think these can become to your overall portfolio in the next couple of years?

Thanks.

Yes, we think that we will see growth in the mid- to high-single digits.

All right, thank you.

Your next question comes from the line of Mark Swartzberg of Stifel Nicolaus.

Yes, thanks good morning.

Two topics; one beer, one Canada partial IPO one.

On beer, David, really nice progression with the gross margin over the course of FY16, about 300 bps up and then -- on an annual basis.

And then in the fourth quarter we saw it about 380 bps up.

So I'm wondering if there's anything unusual in that progression and the progression which improved as the year progressed as we think about how to balance the gross margin in our FY17 estimates and the level of SG&A increases.

And then hand in hand with that we saw like a 40% increase in SG&A in the quarter, $35 million.

Can you give us some sense of what was in that $35 million number?

Yes, so from a margin standpoint, the fourth quarter was really impacted primarily by price and mix.

And I guess we would have again expected that because fourth quarter being when we implement our price increases we would have benefited from the favorable FX and commodities environment, which we benefited from throughout the course of the year, but there was strong tail wind from that in Q4 as well.

And your other question, Mark?

Was the -- that benefit you just described in the fourth quarter was in a sense eaten up by a relatively large increase in SG&A, $35 million, 40% increase.

Can you just speak to what was in that $35 million number?

So in terms of total SG&A, we saw increases in marketing.

We saw increases in compensation expense, we had some increases that would have come into our number on a year-over-year basis as a result of the Ballast Point acquisition.

Got it.

Okay, great.

And then with the Canada partial IPO, I mean kind of the elephant in the room of course is partial and IPO and Canada being this continent called North America, is this the beginning of something larger?

And I realize you're not going to say oh yes, we intend to IPO our larger wine and spirits business eventually.

But is it unreasonable to think that this creates optionality for you should you decide to ever go down that road?

And then hand in hand with that, because it is obviously a leading question, it seems to me that all the merits that you're offering for Canada in terms of how it's performing and so forth, are merits that you could offer for your US business even to a greater degree.

So just help me with what's wrong with that thinking or what's right about that thinking?

Yes, I think that what's right about -- we'll start with what's right about it, okay?

Just to be nice.

I think what's right about it is yes, this kind of thing does provide a greater degree of optionality for us of which it's precisely that, optionality.

We don't -- other than what we currently have planned, we don't necessarily -- we're not planning anything else.

But clearly it gives us more optionality.

As it relates to the rest of the business, I think that you really can't draw any implications from that.

We look around the business and we see what we think are the opportunities, and again, this fits into our whole capital allocation strategy, right?

Managing debt, being able to return money to shareholders through dividends, stock repurchases as well as being able to make some strategic acquisitions from time to time.

So we're just trying to be prudent in a number of -- I'd say we're trying to be transparent, we're trying to show where we think that there's value that isn't necessarily recognized, and then we're also trying to be prudent in our I'll say use of capital and where that capital comes from.

Does that make sense?

Great.

Yes, it makes a ton of sense and really, I don't think anyone was looking for a Canada IPO so it's impressive to see you offering that optionality.

So thank you, Rob.

Appreciate that.

Your next question comes from the line of Bill Chappell of SunTrust.

Hi, this is Stephanie on for Bill.

I just have a quick question, and I apologize if I missed it.

Did you give what's the sales base for the Prisoner acquisition was?

No, we didn't other than to say the Prisoner brands themselves in aggregate represent about 175,000 cases.

Okay.

And then maybe you could give a little bit of an update on the Meiomi acquisition that you did and how its tracking along with your plans, and any opportunities you may have with that going forward?

I would say from my perspective Meiomi continues to track better than our original expectations when we did the acquisition.

The most recent 12 weeks, or at least the 12 weeks in IRI that coincided with the end of our fiscal year had it up -- the brand up 88%.

And as we said when we originally spoke about the transaction, it has one of the best gross profit margin profiles within our entire wine portfolio.

And we've continued to see that and in fact improved upon that a little bit.

So we're very pleased with how we've progressed with Meiomi.

Great.

And then just a follow up, so looking at Prisoner, they would have a similar margin profile, higher than the corporate average but not so high as Meiomi.

Is that the right way to look at it?

That's the right way to look at it.

It probably does come -- actually line up fairly well with Meiomi.

Okay, got it.

Well thanks so much for the color.

Sure.

Your final question comes from the line of John Faucher of JPMorgan.

Hi, this is Peter Graham on for John.

Just one quick question from me.

As you build up and acquire more wine assets are you going to need to add more capacity similar to what you did on the beer side?

Thanks.

We wouldn't expect to.

Our intention for the business is to continue to milk the low end of the portfolio and to drive growth and increase profitability at the high end of the portfolio.

So we will continue to have that consistent capital requirement in our wine business that we've seen over the past several years, but our intent is to make it work harder.

Great, thank you.

Thank you.

I'll now return the call to Rob Sands for any additional or closing remarks.

Okay, well thank you, everyone.

As we wrap up our discussion of the fourth quarter and FY16 results, I want to reiterate how pleased I am with our year-end success and how we are positioned for continued growth and financial strength in FY17.

As our guidance shows, we are confident in our ability to continue achieving growth and we are firm in our commitment to deliver shareholder value.

We look forward to the next time we speak with you in early July when we will share the results of our first quarter of our new fiscal year.

But before then we hope you'll pick up a few of our fine products for your spring celebrations, including Cinco de Mayo and Memorial Day weekend.

And speaking of Cinco, you can look for us at the New York Stock Exchange on May 5 as we officially kick off our Cinco Happy Hour by ringing the closing bell.

Thanks and have a great day.

Thank you for participating in the Constellation Brands' fourth-quarter and full-year 2016 earnings conference call.

You may now disconnect.