家得寶 (HD) 2011 Q3 法說會逐字稿

Good day, everyone and welcome to today's Home Depot third-quarter 2011 earnings conference call. Just a reminder, today's conference is being recorded. (Operator Instructions). Beginning today's discussion is Ms. Diane Dayhoff, Vice President, Investor Relations. Please go ahead.

Thank you, Vicky and good morning to everyone. Welcome to the Home Depot third-quarter earnings conference call. Joining us on our call today are Frank Blake, Chairman and CEO of The Home Depot; Craig Menear, Executive Vice President, Merchandising; and Carol Tome, Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President, Corporate Services.

Following our prepared remarks, the call will be open for analysts' questions. Questions will be limited to analysts and investors and as a reminder, we would appreciate it if the participants would limit themselves to one question with one follow-up please.

This conference call is being broadcast real-time on the Internet at earnings.homedepot.com. The replay will also be available on our site. If we are unable to get to your question during the call, please call our Investor Relations department at 770-384-2387.

Before I turn the call over to Frank, let me remind you that today's press release and the presentations made by our executives include forward-looking statements as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from our expectations and projections.

These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to those factors identified in the release and in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Today's presentations may also include certain non-GAAP measurements. Reconciliation of these measurements is provided on our website. Now let me turn the call over to Frank Blake.

Thank you, Diane and good morning, everyone. Sales for the third quarter were $17.3 billion, up 4.4% from last year. Comp sales were positive 4.2% and our diluted earnings per share were $0.60. Our US stores had a positive comp of 3.8%. From a geographic perspective, we saw positive comps in all but five of our top 40 markets with particular strength in areas such as our New Jersey and South Atlantic regions where there were significant storm impacts.

As Craig will detail, we saw growth not only in storm-related product categories, but also in our core categories. An interesting broad indicator of this is that our strongest division for the quarter was our Western division, which was obviously not affected by Hurricane Irene. We are also pleased that the growth in our overall transaction count has improved sequentially each quarter this year.

On the international front, our Canadian business had essentially flat comps in the quarter and our Mexican business had another quarter of positive comps, making it 32 quarters in a row of positive comp growth, sustained positive performance quarter-over-quarter for eight years in a row, a testament to the great job that Ricardo Saldivar and the team in Mexico are doing.

In the US, we still don't see and we don't expect to see in the near term any meaningful tailwind from the housing market. Inventories remain high, pricing is under pressure and credit is still difficult. Private fixed residential investment, PFRI, as a percent of GDP is still at a historic low. In this type of environment, it is critical that we effectively invest in our business and keep focused on customer service.

To that end, Marvin and his team rolled out three major initiatives during the third quarter -- buy online/pickup in store, a new scheduling system for our associates and a new centralized return-to-vendor process. These have involved significant operational changes in our stores over a compressed period of time. It is an indication of the effectiveness of our field leadership team that we could execute these initiatives without significant store disruption. Both the new scheduling system and the new return-to-vendor process are allowing us to increase customer-facing hours in our stores at the same time that we are improving overall labor productivity.

Our supply chain investments are also delivering significant benefits for the business. As Carol will discuss, we leveraged supply chain expenses in the quarter. As you know, last year, we completed the buildout of our rapid deployment centers, RDCs. Not all of those facilities were mechanized from the start. This was a conscious decision to gain speed in the rollout and to learn about the processes within the RDCs before committing to mechanization. As we have added mechanization, we are seeing benefits in capacity, efficiency and accuracy. We are now underway with mechanizing three more facilities and by the end of fiscal 2012, 18 of the 19 facilities will be mechanized.

Year-to-date in the US, we have handled approximately 65% of our cost of goods through centralized distribution compared to approximately 25% for all of 2007. We have a goal of 75% by 2015.

On the merchandising front, Craig and his team, along with Matt and the IT team, continued to make significant progress on developing tools for our merchandising transformation. If you have followed Home Depot for a while, you know that one of our major areas of opportunity is in upgrading our legacy special order systems. We are now in the midst of a multiyear initiative to replace the legacy system, not with one major change-out, but with a series of incremental releases.

We are about a third of the way through this effort and are very pleased with the success to date. We have digitized our catalogues and are putting the building blocks of the new order management system in place. We are also in the midst of a major upgrade of our dotcom platform, which we anticipate completing by the end of this fiscal year.

But this is not only about technology. There are underlying improvements in our merchandising processes that owe more to business alignment than technology. We now have a process for developing and executing our off-shelf and cross-merchandising strategy across the Company. This may seem straightforward, but it has involved some trial and error blending of centralized merchandising direction with local entrepreneurial activity. As we have gained alignment, we are now seeing steady improvement in sales and unit growth from our off-shelf activity as we add more merchandising excitement and value to our stores.

We will continue to invest in our business to improve customer service and productivity. Along with that, we believe it is also critical to continue to invest in our associates. Approximately 81% of our stores would qualify for success-sharing based on our third-quarter results and our objective is to maintain record levels of success-sharing payouts to our hourly associates.

Finally, today, our Board announced a 16% increase in our quarterly dividend to $0.29 per share. Carol will discuss our updated capital allocation principles in a few minutes. Our guiding philosophy has been and will continue to be to maintain discipline on our capital allocation, focus on creating value for our shareholders and maintain a solid financial footing for our business on a sustaining basis.

Let me close by thanking our associates for all their hard work and dedication in the third quarter and with that, let me turn the call over to Craig.

Thanks, Frank and good morning, everyone. Sales in the third quarter were driven by continued strength in the core of the store, as well as storm recovery. We saw growth in both average ticket and transactions during the quarter. 10 of our departments posted positive comps for the quarter. The departments that outperformed the Company's average comp were tools, electrical, indoor garden, building materials, plumbing and hardware. Paint, flooring, lighting and kitchen showed positive comps. Comps in lumber, outdoor garden, bath and millwork were negative for the quarter.

Cleanup activity from the impacts of Hurricane Irene and the resulting flooding led to strength in storm-related products such as generators, pumps, extension cords and wet/dry vacs. We also saw continued strength in roofing and gutters as customers repaired damage from early harsh winter weather. We estimate that the impact of storm-related sales to be approximately a point of comp.

The temperatures normalized after a hot August and we saw customers return to simple outdoor projects and outdoor living categories. We are particularly pleased to have posted positive comps in categories such as patio furniture, fireplace, walk-behind mowers, grills and lawn accessories given the strong performance we saw in outdoor living categories during the third quarter of 2010. Outdoor projects such as fencing, exterior stains, exterior paint and irrigation also performed well in the quarter.

We did see some regional variances. For example, with drought-like conditions in parts of the Southern division, we saw tough sales of riding mowers and live goods, partially offset by strong sales of watering.

The maintenance and repair categories that make up the core of our store continued to perform well. Project basics such as pipe and fitting, fasteners, air circulation, hand tools, chemicals, caulks and appliance parts were positive. And as customers prepared for winter, small maintenance projects like insulation and waterproofing also sold well.

Great brands and innovative products led to positive performance in portable power, power tool accessories and hand tools during the third quarter. We offered outstanding values in power tools from brands like Ryobi, Milwaukee, Mikita, Rigid and DeWalt and we are seeing consistent response to these brands from our customers. We have also seen positive response from our pro customers in hand tools from the Milwaukee and DeWalt lines that are exclusive to the Home Depot.

We've continued to deliver innovation through the extension of our LED light bulb offering for the home. At the beginning of the third quarter, we added the first two LED bulbs that will fit most customers' recessed cans. Additionally, we just added the first commercially available 75 watt equivalent LED A-line replacement.

We saw total transactions grow by 1.2% while average ticket also increased 3% for the quarter. The transactions for tickets under $50 representing approximately 20% of our US sales were flat for the third quarter. As I mentioned earlier, we were pleased with our ability to manage effectively against categories that were significant transaction drivers in the third quarter of 2010. Transactions for tickets over $900, which also represent approximately 20% of our US sales, were up 3.6% in the third quarter. Strength in roofing and generators contributed to the growth in our average ticket.

During the third quarter, lumber prices were essentially flat to last year. Comp pricing was elevated, but began to come down at the end of the quarter. The total impacts to comp from commodity inflation during the quarter was approximately 40 basis points.

As we look forward to the fourth quarter, we are facing the anniversary of the expiration of an energy-efficient tax credit in the US that increased sales in millwork and home services during the fourth quarter of 2010. We are also lapping strong performance from our gift centers, as well as our Black Friday lineup last year. We've planned for this and we are projecting to deliver positive comps in the quarter.

We are excited about our decorative holiday and gift center offerings, as well as our black Friday lineup. We have expanded our LED Christmas light selection to over 70 different options and earlier this month, we gave customers rebates for trading in old incandescent strands. We also have added several new holiday decoration offerings from Martha Stewart. Our gift center offers outstanding values with strong lineups of hand tools, power tools, safety items, tool storage and special buys.

And finally, we have a strong lineup of special buys for Black Friday, including appliance offers. We are excited about the products and values that we have to offer our customers in the fourth quarter and we invite you to visit us in store, online or through our mobile apps to check them out. And with that, I would like to turn the call over to Carol.

Thank you, Craig and hello, everyone. In the third quarter, sales were $17.3 billion, up 4.4% from last year. Comps or same-store sales were positive 4.2% for the quarter with comps up 5.2% in August, 4.1% in September and 3.5% in October. Comps for US stores were positive 3.8% for the quarter with US comps up 4.5% in August, 3.4% in September and 3.4% in October.

In the third quarter, our gross margin was 34.4%, an increase of 15 basis points from last year of which 13 basis points came from our US business. The gross margin expansion in the US was driven by 26 basis points of benefit arising from our supply chain transformation, offset in part by a change in the mix of products and services sold, as well as higher shrink compared to last year. For the year, we expect moderate gross margin expansion.

Operating expenses as a percent of sales decreased by 45 basis points to 25.1%. Our expense leverage reflects the impact of positive sales growth, as well as continuing cost control. While we had $26 million of natural disaster expense arising from storm damage, we leveraged every major expense line in the quarter. For the year, we now expect total expenses to grow at approximately 20% of our sales growth rate.

Interest and other expense for the third quarter totaled $158 million, slightly higher than last year due to higher debt levels. Our income tax provision rate was 35.9% in the third quarter and earnings per share for the third quarter were $0.60, up 17.6% from last year.

Now moving to our operational metrics, during the third quarter, we opened one new store in Mexico and one new store in St. Croix. We temporarily closed one store in Binghamton, New York due to flooding damage and we expect this store to reopen during the fourth quarter. At the end of the third quarter, we were operating 2246 stores and selling square footage was 235 million. Reflecting the sales environment, total sales per square foot for the third quarter were $293, up 4.3% year-over-year.

Now turning to the balance sheet, at the end of the quarter, inventory was $10.7 billion, down approximately $300 million from a year ago. Inventory turns were 4.3 times, a modest improvement from last year. We ended the quarter with $41.5 billion in assets, including $2.2 billion in cash.

In the third quarter, we repurchased $800 million, or 23.6 million shares of outstanding stock. Year-to-date, we have repurchased $3.1 billion, or 87 million shares. It is our intent to continue using excess cash to repurchase shares and we plan to repurchase approximately $400 million of outstanding shares in the fourth quarter. Computed on the average of beginning and ending long-term debt and equity for the trailing four quarters, return on invested capital was 14.1%, 210 basis points higher than the third quarter of fiscal 2010.

On the capital allocation front, we continue to have a disciplined and balanced approach, investing in our business and returning cash to our shareholders in the form of dividends and share repurchases. In this regard, we have a few items to call out. First, year-to-date, we spent roughly $820 million in capital expenditures and anticipate that our total capital spending for fiscal 2011 will approximate $1.250 billion.

Second, as Frank mentioned, we just announced a 16% increase in our quarterly cash dividend to $0.29 per share. With this, we are lifting our targeted dividend payout ratio to 50%, up from our previous target of 40%.

Third, as of the end of the third quarter, we have $6.8 billion remaining in our share repurchase authorization. It is our intent to use excess cash to repurchase shares and complete the authorization by the end of fiscal 2014.

And finally, we are assuming a slightly more conservative financial risk profile and are targeting to maintain an adjusted debt to EBITDA ratio of approximately 2 times. Our updated shareholder principal guidelines reflect our view that a solid dividend, coupled with prudent use of cash, will create the most value for all stakeholders.

Now let me turn to our outlook for the balance of the year. Remember that we guide off of GAAP. Our sales performance continues to outpace real GDP growth, driven by strength in the core of our store, as well as certain weather-related sales and merchandising events. Year-to-date, our sales have grown by 2.9%. We face a tough sales comparison in the fourth quarter, but consistent with earlier guidance, we continue to project that our fiscal 2011 sales will grow by approximately 2.5%.

Our business continues to perform to our expectations and we are seeing positive comps thus far in November. Based on the year-to-date results and our outlook for the fourth quarter, we now project fiscal 2011 earnings per share to increase approximately 18% to $2.38. While we intend to repurchase $400 million of outstanding shares in the fourth quarter, given the timing of the repurchases, they won't have a meaningful impact to our full-year EPS guidance.

So we will share our 2012 guidance with you during our fourth-quarter earnings call, which is scheduled for February 21. We thank you for your participation in today's call and Vicky, we are now ready for questions.

(Operator Instructions). Chris Horvers, JPMorgan.

Thanks and good morning. First question, just delving into the 2.0% debt to EBITDAR target up previously -- or down previously from 2.5%, so just was curious if you could just spend a little more time talking about that decision. I think the dividend -- after raising the dividend, you kind of get back to a similar capital distribution level in either situation, but was just curious what the conversation was among senior management and the Board.

Yes, Chris, let me make a general comment and then turn it over to Carol. First, agree with your comment in terms of the return of the money to our shareholders. We also looked at the fact that, while we have had the 2.5 times guardrail that we have described actually for the last several years, we have been running at about 2 times. So we thought that it was better just in terms of transparency to say here is what we think is the right target for us going forward. And obviously, as our earnings improve, that will have capacity for additional debt. Carol?

Right and you have seen that this year. We raised $1 billion of incremental debt earlier in the year while maintaining that 2 times ratio. So looking ahead as our earnings grow, it gives us more borrowing capacity and financial flexibility. We also think in this low growth economic environment, a solid financial condition is a competitive advantage and we are really pleased with where we are.

Now you might say, well, gosh, interest rates are low, don't you have an opportunity to borrow? Our perspective is interest rates will remain low for a while. So no hurry to rush out to the market.

And then as a follow-up on the expense side, if you back out that $23 million or $26 million, it looks like you would have leveraged SG&A about 60 basis points. So I was just curious if there was any incentive comp drag in there and also should we think about 20 basis points of SG&A leverage per point of comp? It was a bit lower, so just trying to figure it out there. Thanks.

Well, sure. In the third quarter, our expenses grew at about 59% of our sales growth rate and there are a couple of factors you need to keep in mind. First, we did have $26 million of natural disaster expense arising from flooding. And then last year, you may recall, we had a $20 million gain on the sale of real estate that didn't repeat this year. So there is a little bit of year-over-year distortion.

For the full year, we are expecting our expenses to grow at about 20% of our sales growth rate and that is a real tribute to just the great work that the team is doing and driving productivity in all expense lines.

Thank you.

Colin McGranahan, Bernstein.

Good morning. I wanted to actually follow up on the capital allocation first. Carol, you said that you thought that 2.0% was quote/unquote the right leverage ratio. I think the academic work would suggest that that is probably not the optimal cost of capital for a company like you. So how are you arriving at 2.0% as the right? And then just to follow up on that, is there any sense here that you want to keep a more conservative ratio for either economic reasons because you are uncertain about the future or a more conservative ratio so that you have maybe some dry powder expansion outside the US or outside of North America? I know you've talked about or potentially acquisitions down the road so that you have capacity if you wanted to do something like that?

It is such a great question in terms of the right ratio because, all day long, from an academic perspective, we should say that really we should put a lot more leverage into our capital structure, perhaps go down to a BBB rating or less to optimize the weighted average cost of capital. And yet when you look at it, do you really believe they can create shareholder value that way. We think that by maintaining an adjusted debt to EBITDAR ratio of 2 times, we are projecting growth in 2012 and beyond. That is going to add additional borrowing capacity into our capital structure, afford us a tremendous amount of financial flexibility.

And what is that financial flexibility for? I guess that was my second question.

Well, as you know, we are investing our capital in our existing business. As we think about financial flexibility, what our actions have shown is that use it for the shareholders. So when we borrowed $1 billion this year, we return that to the shareholders through an accelerated share repurchase.

I would also say, Colin, this is not a signal that there is something different in our minds internationally or anything like that. In fact, I mean this is really just a slight move from what we have previously said and no move at all from what we have been doing over the last three years.

Okay. Still not sure I am certain the thinking there. But second quick follow-up, in terms of your comments around the tough sales compare, are you seeing any impact yet from anniversarying the tax credits in some of those categories?

Well, if I could just jump in and then Craig will comment, November is our toughest comparison, as you know and we are positive comping thus far this month. If you look at the performance by category, millwork is one of our softest categories.

We are definitely seeing the pressure from the growth in millwork last year versus this year. It was one of the areas that we negative comped in in the third quarter and we anticipate that it will be a very tough comp in the fourth quarter based on the overlap of the tax credit.

Great. Thank you very much. Thanks.

Brian Nagel, Oppenheimer.

Hi, good morning. First, just a question on the comp progression through the quarter. So you indicated that weather -- now I am assuming you are mostly talking about the hurricane -- but I just wanted to -- as you look at the comp progression for the quarter, was the majority of that weather benefit then in the month of August or early in the quarter?

Yes, yes, it was.

Okay, so basically the comps have kind of progressed evenly through the quarter. The second question -- I just wanted to ask a question on the capital allocation discussion today, but the timing, you made the announcement today on the dividend and the targeted debt ratios. As you decide to do this, is this more a reflection of what you are seeing inside your business, inside the Home Depot enterprise, or is it more a reflection of external factors that you've decided this now?

Well, generally, we have been on a cadence of lifting the dividend every year in the January/February timeframe. As we sat back and looked at the performance of the business, the confidence that we have in all the initiatives that we have got underway and our prospects for the future, we said there is no better time than to look the dividend. Now you shouldn't expect us to look the dividend again in January or February of 2012. You should expect us to come back at the end of 2012 or the beginning of 2013 to look to lift the dividend again. But we thought there was no better time.

We also just wanted to add a little bit more definition around the targeted adjusted debt to EBITDAR ratio. I can't tell you the number of times we get asked when are you going to lever up to 2.5 times. We set 2.5 times as a cap, not a target. We are now setting 2 as the target and we will maintain the target.

Thank you.

Michael Lasser, UBS.

Carol, when are you going to lever up to 2.5 times lease adjusted debt to EBITDAR again? But the strategy makes sense. You weren't getting credit for keeping it at or below 2 times, so now you're merely signaling that that is what you're going to do. But are there certain triggers for -- so if you started to see 4% comp growth for an extended period of time, like you have --.

Look, Michael, that is a great question, great comment. These things are situational, so as the situation changes, we could obviously change what our target is. But as Carol said, we thought for purposes of transparency, it was better to say, hey, this is what we have been doing for the last three years. We don't see this changing going forward. When we do see it -- if circumstances change, growth starts to accelerate a lot more then you might have a different answer.

Understood. And then on the promotional side, is there a philosophy to promote to the comp? And by that I mean you anticipated that you have a difficult fourth-quarter comparison, so does that mean that you are intentionally planning some activities to comp the comp and is that different than how you have been in the past?

We are always trying to build the business to drive comp performance year-over-year and I think the key focus that we have been trying to have for the past several years is to drive that really great value for our customers, to build our business bay by bay so that we are driving consistent performance. Certainly where we go in and we create events, we are conscious of the fact that we need to in total cover that volume, but it doesn't necessarily mean that it is going to cover in that category.

Okay, let me sneak one last one in here. Of the three initiatives that were completed during or near completion during the third quarter, have there been incremental costs associated with those activities such that we should see some benefit to the cost structure moving forward?

This is Marvin. From a cost standpoint, the answer is, in overall incremental costs, these are big initiatives and the goal is to hit our 60/40 ratio of service and tasks. So the goal primarily is to drive productivity and we believe that we are going to see productivity improvements in the short term, but more productivity improvements will be in 2012 and going forward.

If I could just jump in, some of the costs that we did experience was capitalized costs associated with new technology. So if you look at our capital spending, it is up year-on-year and most of that delta is in the area of technology.

That's good. Thank you very much.

David Strasser, Janney Capital Markets.

Thank you very much. Two questions. First, going to the capital allocation, when you look at your capital allocation, who are you benchmarking against to sort of make some of these decisions?

We look at the world is the broad answer. It is hard to look at a retailer to say, a-ha, this is a company that we want to emulate. So we look broadly at the Dow group of companies, the S&P group of companies. There are some really good stories out there to follow. One good story would be McDonald's. We love what McDonald's has done, but there are other companies as well.

I guess in the past you had -- I think, Frank, you had mentioned, at one point, jcpenney, but they seemed to have changed strategies pretty dramatically I think over the years as well. (multiple speakers).

They may be in the process of doing that, yes.

Exactly. One other -- if you mentioned it, I missed it, talking about appliances. It seems to have been a very volatile category in the third quarter in that there seems to have been winners and losers throughout the industry. Just trying to get a sense where you guys -- how you guys did in that area.

We were mid-single-digit negative in appliances.

Do you think you gained lost share?

We believe we lost just a little bit of share in the quarter.

When you are doing -- losing share there, do you think it is because of just an unwillingness to match on price. Do you think there was anything structural there? Do you think it was just sort of around near-term pricing?

I don't think there is anything structural there. I think it is just there is activity in the marketplace. We have a portfolio strategy. We are comfortable with the position that we take in appliances. Not looking to be the leader in that business.

I think that's the key, isn't it, Craig? I mean we are number three and we are happy being number three.

Right.

All right, great. Thank you very much. I appreciate it.

Mike Baker, Deutsche Bank.

Hi, thanks, guys. So I'll ask one question and a follow-up. The question just on the cadence of the buyback, so I think you are saying about $3.5 billion this year and then the $6.8 billion through 2014 equates to something in the $2.3 billion range, so a significant slowdown. I guess the question is is there upside to that number or is it really just a signal that you are just going to be buying back less annually?

And then I will ask -- my follow-up upfront would relate again to the appliance business. So I think HH Gregg and Sears were pretty aggressive in the quarter. What are you seeing in November, particularly from your biggest competitor in terms of pricing in general, but specifically on appliances as they seem to be signaling a more aggressive posture? Thanks.

I will start with the cadence on the buybacks. We gave some color today hoping it would help you build your models. The way I would think about it is we are spending $2.5 billion with cash generated from the business to buy back shares this year. So you should assume at least $2.5 billion next year, that would mean $2.5 billion in '13, remaining $1.4 billion in '14.

However, as we've just talked about, with increased earnings, we will have borrowing capacity just like we did this year. We raised $1 billion. That takes us to the full $3.5 billion. So as we look at next year, we will have borrowing capacity, which would allow us to accelerate some of the share repurchases. I don't want to tell you the day, the time as we sit here in November because we want to be opportunistic in terms of debt capital raising, but there is clearly an opportunity to accelerate it. But hopefully this is helpful from a modeling perspective.

Very. Thank you.

Okay, on the appliance front, we have seen the market be fairly aggressive in this category. We see that it is off to a strong start in terms of the promotional activity, if you will, in the business as we head into the holiday season here. We are candidly pretty comfortable with the plans that we have put together for the business in the fourth quarter. So again, it fits within -- our plans fit within our portfolio strategy overall.

Thank you.

Dennis McGill, Zelman & Associates.

Good morning and thank you. Carol, I guess this first question would be around inventory. Can you maybe talk about the decline in the quarter and how you guys are viewing inventory overall and then maybe highlight some categories where you are being either more conservative or more opportunistic?

Well, we are thrilled with our inventory performance and we've just spent a lot of money transforming our supply chain, so we are hoping to see this come through. As you know, we have committed to get a full turn of improvement over the next several years.

If you look at where we are seeing it, part of it is really just in terms of the quality of the inventory. Our clearance levels are as low as they have ever been in our Company history. And then, Craig, you might want to give some color on just how we are going about forecasting and --.

Sure. All of the tools that we have been building and putting in place, the new forecasting system that was put into place has helped us better manage the inventory on a day in/day out basis. We have obviously worked hard over the past several years to do a much better job of managing our seasonal inventory. But now we are seeing benefits come through in our basic categories as a result of these tools that we have put into play.

Obviously, the RDC allows us to effectively put inventory where it is needed with a last-minute allocation that is put into place. So it is all of these elements that are coming together that is helping us leverage the inventory investment.

And then if I could just jump in, I would say in-store execution is also helping. So Marvin, you might want to give a couple of comments about power packdown and what we do there.

Dennis, as a little bit of perspective, when product comes from the RDC, over 80% goes directly from receiving to the sales floor. I have been here over nine years and that is a big difference from what we have seen in the past. If you walk our stores today, as Carol mentioned, you will see less product in the overhead than in the history of the Company. It's not because we are doing anything other than getting the right product at the right place at the right time and we have some very fundamental things that we are doing in the store just to keep the product on the shelves, stay in stock so we can limit the amount of inventory and have product on the shelf for the customers to buy. It is a very fundamental approach, but the RDC and the technology Craig mentioned allows us to do this much better than we ever have before.

The most important thing is the fact that when we look at inventory productivity, that has always measured against in-stock and so we are constantly making sure that, as we look at the investments we are making in the inventory, that that is balanced by the fact that we have to continue to improve our in-stock position for our customers, which we have.

Okay, and so a follow-up on that would be I guess, Carol, do you have a target of where you would like to end this year on inventory? And then bigger picture, as you continue to refine the distribution network, working capital was a nice swing this year versus last. Any general thoughts on how we could think about that in '12? Can you continue to strip working capital out of the business in total?

Yes, so we should show some modest improvement in inventory turns year-on-year by the end of the year certainly is our target and we are on path to deliver that. As we look to 2012, we will give you more color in February, but I can tell you we're building our plans right now and we're building working capital as a source of cash for 2012.

Okay, very helpful. Thank you.

Scot Ciccarelli, RBC Capital Markets.

Hey, guys, Scot Ciccarelli. When you look at the different sized buckets that you guys lay out for us, I think it is interesting that you have had actually a pretty nice gain in three of the last four quarters. Not necessarily intuitive given kind of what we are seeing in the broader housing market. And I get the fact that stuff like storms can certainly help and skew the data a little bit. But are you guys seeing or do you sense there's a little bit of change in consumer appetite for bigger projects or has three of the last four quarters just had its own unique aspects?

I think what is happening is as you mentioned. Certainly, as I called out, roofing, generators, those type of things that are storm-related certainly help, but the fact that we had a positive comp growth in our kitchen business again is an indication of the work that we have done to really develop the business, give value to the customer across any way they want to buy a kitchen, whether that is in stock, take it home today, special order, have their cabinets refaced, all those being positive. Being a bigger ticket sale has contributed to the past few quarters in terms of the big-ticket growth. And candidly there, that is an area where we are taking share because the industry itself isn't growing from everything we can gather from our supply base.

The other thing we have just started up a new consumer insights team and we are getting some very interesting data. If you look at the third quarter, both our transactions and our ticket grew, as you know. But when you break it down between consumers and pro, we saw an increase in transactions and ticket for the consumer, but in the pro, transactions are down, but the ticket was way up. So the pro who is shopping with us is more sticky and is buying more with us.

Interesting. And then just any thoughts or color regarding the year-over-year comparison for that big ticket bucket? Obviously you were up I think it was north of a 9% increase last year in the fourth quarter?

The fourth quarter was a strong quarter.

It was a very strong quarter last year. (multiple speakers)

We've got to anniversary that.

And again, as I mentioned, we are aware that we have to deliver upon those comps. We've built programs across the store to be able to do that. There is businesses, for example, with a continued development of LED helps drive increase in ticket inside of that category. Lithium tools, for example, carries a higher ticket than NiCad power tools. So there are elements across the store that we are driving to continue to build the ticket in our business.

Very helpful. Thank you.

Dan Binder, Jefferies & Co.

Hi, good morning. It's Dan Binder. I just wanted to jump back to the competitive landscape for a minute. Your main competitor is shifting more towards EDLP. I am just curious if you are feeling compelled or seeing any need to price match in certain areas of the store? There also seems to be a little bit more of an emerging online growth by some other players and just curious how you are viewing the online opportunity longer term. I know you're investing a lot in that currently.

So first and foremost, from our go-to-market strategy, ground zero for us is our portfolio strategy. We always go back to our portfolio strategy. What is it we want to stand for, how do we drive the business, that determines both assortment strategy, as well as our go-to-market pricing strategy in the business. We have been focused for a number of years on driving to every day great value for our customer. That remains our focus. Certainly we have categories like appliances where the industry still remains promotional. It is difficult to break those businesses as hard as we are trying. But our focus is really on trying to drive great value for our customers every day.

When we look at competition, we look at competition across a broad segment. It is not just our large competitor in this space. We compete against multiple people, independents, as well as online competitors. And we are constantly looking at how we react to the market. Again, our portfolio strategy guides where we react and how we react and to what's -- (inaudible) react in a given category. But that is a constant monitoring both of brick-and-mortar retail, as well as online retail and making adjustments in our business to make sure that we are delivering value for our customers.

Okay. So I guess with that said, are you finding that you're having to do any kind of material price matching activity? Is that getting -- is that seeing any kind of increases or are you doing it in the aisles before the customer approaches you?

I haven't seen in our numbers any dramatic change in competitive price match data. We are constantly monitoring the market on a weekly basis, proactively making adjustments in our business as we need to.

And we view broad discounting with a great deal of caution and we have competitors who do offer broad discounts like with their private label card or something like that and we aren't seeing that we have to match that.

And Dan, this is Marvin. There is really great alignment between the store operators and Craig's field merchandising team. We are keenly aware of all of our competitors, but we have not seen any major changes in price match, not in the near term or even in the past, which is very consistent with how we run our business and as Craig mentioned, the portfolio strategy is the cornerstone and we provide input into that.

Great, thank you.

Todd Duvick, Bank of America.

Hey, good morning. This is Greg Hessler standing in for Todd Duvick. Do you have a targeted credit rating? I mean with the announcement this morning, as well as how -- your leverage has been creeping lower over the past several years. I wanted to see if you have a target there and was that a factor at all for the rationale?

Today, we have a split rating. We have a BBB+ rating from S&P and a weak single A from Moody's. We think having an unsplit rating would be good, so weak single A would be a good target for us.

Okay. Thank you.

Eric Bosshard, Cleveland Research Company.

Good morning. You have shown, I think, with -- you characterized it as a little bit better sales growth than the market up. You have done better on expenses and better on gross margin. I guess I'm curious as you think about 2012, the sustainability of what looks to have been some outperformance relative to the market, maybe even relative to your targets across those three areas.

Well, that is -- our job is to continue to invest in the business so that we position ourselves to continue to gain marketshare. We don't stop -- it wasn't like 2010 or 2011 we look at as one-off years. It is a sustaining effort and that is really the purpose behind our investments on the supply chain, merchandising tools and then the operational side.

We are on a path to reach a 10% operating margin by 2013.

As you think about 4Q, you have characterized it as a tougher comparison and seem to be (inaudible) that the marketshare gains or the upside sales performance may take a pause in the fourth quarter. I guess I would be interested if you could broaden your thoughts on that if that is a one-quarter event or if now the comparisons are tougher, so we are going to see more in line with the market type of sales performance.

I think if you go back to the fourth quarter of 2010, I mean it was a significant significant outperformance in 2010 and as we called out at the time around our seasonal and appliance offerings. We know, as Craig said, that is in our plans for how we approach the fourth quarter, but that delta performance was probably a one-off in that quarter.

It is also the impact of the energy tax credit. In the fourth quarter of last year, we estimated it drove about 40 to 50 basis points of comp in the fourth quarter. As we have reflected on it and done additional work, it was even a bigger contribution. So that is not repeating this year.

And then one other follow-up. On the gross margin line, impact of inflation, did you see any negative impact proportionately notable impact on profitability from inflation in the quarter?

We didn't. We would have called it out had we seen that.

Okay, great. Thank you.

Budd Bugatch, Raymond James.

Good morning, everyone. This is actually TJ McConville filling in for Budd. Thanks for taking my question. Carol, you mentioned quickly in passing the consumer insights team and what you are finding with your pro customer in reference to ticket and traffic. I would love to hear any of the other findings that you have had so far with that program as to, maybe within the pro, what the category changes have been, maybe if you are gaining share there or anything that you have found early days so far?

So TJ, as Carol referenced, and kind of if you take a step back, we had had an outside third-party firm that was helping us do consumer insights. We have now shifted and have that capacity in-house and some of the very basic data is what we are just getting now, but it is just starting now. So around the very broad -- hey, here is what your pros are doing, here is what your consumers are doing. So we really don't have additional items to share with you all.

Okay, fair enough. We will look forward to hearing those data. And then secondly, Marvin, you mentioned earlier you are still looking towards 60/40 customer facing detach. Where do you stand today and how much more of these three initiatives do you have to roll out in the next quarter and where do you think you will stand after that?

TJ, we are going to end the year at roughly 55% and we are very pleased with that. When we started this a few years back, we were at 47% service to task, so we'll end this year at 55%. We think we will get north of 60% within the next 16 months. My team is responsible for working cross-functionally with Matt Carey's IT team, with Craig's team to lay out initiatives for the upcoming years and keep this process going. We don't see this as an endpoint. We see it as a continuous point of improvement, so we have initiatives that actually go through 2015. We are going to continue to drive productivity.

We have a very simple philosophy of trying to take task out of the store while driving productivity concurrently. And we have been very pleased with our payroll leverage and our ability to reduce overall payroll yet add hours to the salesforce. So we are increasing coverage for service while reducing overall payroll because we are eliminating some of the tasks that in the past dominated all of our payroll spend.

Okay, thanks much. Best of luck on the rest of the year.

David Schick, Stifel.

Hi, good morning. I wonder if we could build on that. If you look at all the work you have done on the RDCs and distribution in general, but then combining it with what Marvin just talked about holistically on the efficiency of hours and tasking in the store, given the stage of all the work that you have done over several years, how should we think about the rate of change for both gross and leverage or just operating margin benefits of all that efficiency work in aggregate the last couple of years versus the next couple going forward?

Well, you'll recall when we had our Investor Day back in 2010, we said we would get 40 basis points of margin extension off of the supply chain. I think there is more upside opportunity to this than down just looking at the performance for the past two quarters, which gives us just a tremendous amount of confidence in our trek towards that 10% operating margin that we really believe we will deliver by 2013.

Okay. And is the efficiency more targeted at just pure flow-through of gross or is it what it allows you to do labor wise in the store? Or is that changing at all?

I commented on the gross margin aspect on the labor productivity. You're seeing it today. We leveraged hourly payroll in the quarter by about 38 basis points. So it was the key driver of the leverage that we experienced and supply chain is a piece of this. All the new tools that Marvin and team have introduced is another piece of it.

Thanks very much.

Greg Melich, ISI.

Hi, thanks. Two quick questions. One, could you just give us the actual numbers for the comp traffic and ticket in the US?

The actual numbers for the comp in the US, the comp ticket was up 2.7% and the transactions up 1.1%.

On a comp basis? And then second is on SG&A. Carol, if I take the guidance of growing 20% of sales and just use your 2.5% for the year, I get deleverage in the fourth quarter. Is that because last year was so strong and that is just the flow-through to the SG&A side or is there something else that we are missing there?

Well, there is probably some modeling nuances going on because we are showing that we will leverage expenses in the fourth quarter.

Got it. Okay. And then quickly then, credit, do you have the update on the credit penetration particularly given the strength in large ticket transactions?

Yes, we are very pleased with how our private label credit card is performing in this environment. We saw a slight tickdown in penetration, about 17 basis points to 22.7%. But the reason why I say we are very encouraged and pleased with the performance is simply when we look at new accounts. As you may recall, we have a consumer card and a pro card and 70% of the penetration is on the consumer, 30% on the pro. If we look at approval rates for our professional contractors, they are up 300 basis points year-over-year. That is great news because you know how important the pro is to us.

If we look at approval rates for the consumer, however, they are down about 400 basis points. And the reason why they are down is because of the requirements pursuant to the CARD Act and the ability to pay. It is very cumbersome to apply for a consumer card in our stores. It is cumbersome on our part, it is cumbersome on the part of our underwriter. So we have a number of changes underway to make it less cumbersome and we believe that will help increase the approval rates.

It is not that the quality of the applicants is bad; it is just they don't have all the information necessary to get approved. So our approval rates are still pretty good; they are 71%. So that is still pretty good. But we think if we can simplify it, we will get it even better.

That's great. Thanks a lot.

Vicky, we have time for one more question.

Kate McShane, Citi Investment Research.

Thank you, good morning. I was wondering if there was any more commentary about the successes that you are seeing with the buy online/pick up in store and if you have seen any increase in conversion as you get more people in the store with this initiative.

So we are pleased with how our total online business is progressing. We have currently about 9.5 million visitors to our site a week, which compares to about 6.5 million back in 2009. We continue to add SKUs to our business overall. We are north of roughly 300,000 SKUs at year-end and we made a number of changes to our site as you probably have seen. So we are very pleased with the progress. We are obviously making an investments in our operating system right now, but our business hasn't reached $1 billion in total yet.

Kate, this is Marvin. We are very pleased just with the alignment -- we talk about alignment a lot and we think that is a powerful component of success in our business. With the IT team, with Craig's team, with the dotcom team, we have spent a lot of time ensuring that we benchmark really good retailers, not only in the US, but in Europe on how this process should work.

The rollout was very smooth. The reception from our associates and customers have been very good and we are excited about how well the stores are executing and how well the customer service feedback is coming back to us on how easy the process is and how transparent it is. So so far, we are very pleased.

That's great. Thank you.

Well, thank you, everyone, for joining us today. We look forward to talking with you throughout the quarter and in our fourth-quarter earnings call, which will be in the month of February.

That does conclude today's teleconference. Thank you all for joining.