AerCap Holdings NV (AER) 2022 Q3 法說會逐字稿

Good day, and welcome to AerCap's Third Quarter 2020 Financial Results. Today's conference is being recorded, and a transcript will be available following the call on the company's website. At this time, I'd like to turn the conference over to Joseph McGinley, Head of Investor Relations. Please go ahead, sir.

Thank you, operator, and hello, everyone. Welcome to our third quarter 2022 conference call. With me today is our Chief Executive Officer, Aengus Kelly; and our Chief Financial Officer, Pete Juhas. Before we begin today's call, I would like to remind you that some statements made during this conference call, which are not historical facts, may be forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results or events to differ materially from those expressed or implied in such statements.

AerCap undertakes no obligation other than that imposed by law to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements to reflect future events, information or circumstances that arise after this call. Further information concerning issues that could materially affect performance can be found in AerCap's earnings release dated November 3, 2022. A copy of our earnings release and conference call presentation are available on our website at aercap.com. This call is open to the public and is being webcast simultaneously at aercap.com and will be archived for replay. We will shortly run through our earnings presentation and we'll allow time at the end for Q&A. As a reminder, I would ask that analysts limit themselves to one question and one follow-up. I will now turn the call over to Aengus Kelly.

Thank you for joining us for our third quarter 2022 earnings call. We are pleased to report another quarter of strong earnings for AerCap. During the third quarter, we generated $2.21 of adjusted earnings per share and adjusted net income of $537 million. We generated strong net income and cash flow and achieved our target leverage ratio well ahead of our expectations. As a result, we are raising our full year EPS guidance from a range of $6.50 to $7 to a range of $8 to $8.50.

As we've discussed in prior quarters, the environment for aircraft leasing continues to strengthen, and we are seeing this reflected in our financial results. On the operational side, the impact of this strengthening demand is clearly evident. The best indication of this was in the execution of a record 255 transactions in the third quarter. This included lease agreements for 137 aircraft, 24 helicopters and 23 engines. We also completed the purchase of 15 aircraft, 16 engines and 3 helicopters and sold 21 aircraft, 13 engines and 3 helicopters. The amount of data emanating from this level of transaction activity is unparalleled and gives AerCap unique insights into the market, allowing us to make meaningful decisions earlier and with more conviction. Today, it's the reason we are considerably more optimistic about global wide-body demand than many others. We believe that the shortages we are currently experiencing in the narrow-body markets will be replicated in the wide-body market. And like the narrow-body market, the tight supply will persist for the next 2 years.

As an example, in the third quarter alone, AerCap signed 30 wide-body leases, of which 11 were from our order book and 19 were for used aircraft with broad-based demand in Europe, Asia and South America. This will be sustained by the low production rates for new Boeing 787, Airbus A350 and 330neo aircraft as well as significantly longer lead times for components, engines and shop visits, which are impacting the supply of older kits. In fact, it may surprise you to learn that storage rates for Boeing 787s are actually lower than for Airbus A320neos today. As a result, we believe that we will continue to see strong demand and upward pressure on lease rates for wide-body aircraft.

As I described in our last earnings call, we are continuing to see significant delivery delays on new aircraft from the OEMs. This is caused by a number of factors, including the shortage of engines available to service both new aircraft deliveries and spare engine requirements and a shortage of MRO capacity to repair engines in a timely manner. On the first point, the engine OEMs are under pressure to increase the production rates for new engines by the airframe manufacturers. This creates a steep industrial challenge to the in-service pool rather than to new aircraft deliveries.

The issues around the new engine technology coming off in early are not unique to these engines. They are a predictable part of the teething process of inducting new technology. However, it's happening at a time when supply chains and labor availability are already under pressure. Working in an MRO is a highly skilled job and finding qualified engineers or mechanics to fill these roles is not straightforward as it requires up to few people outside the industry realize how complex the approval, certification and delivery processes are for the manufacturers, especially after an unexpected hiatus in production. It's not just as simple as building the inventory and when the aircraft is recertified you deliver it.

Airplanes are not meant to sit idle. So there are numerous checks that need to take place before an airplane can be reactivated. For example, engine power levels, critical systems such as cockpit instrumentation and cabin pressurization, et cetera, which can easily take up to a month per aircraft. And then any modifications like cabin changes will have to be made after that. Further, the increased oversight from the FAA on their processes is also adding to the logistical challenges of delivering new aircraft. This is why Boeing, for example, has not been able to deliver all of its fully built 737 MAXs compared to over 150 in full year 2019, which is contributing to further tightness in supply. Given the events of the last few years, it is no surprise that all of the OEMs are facing higher scrutiny on deliveries and quality assurance, but we are confident they will address these issues.

In the meantime, our leading engine leasing business is well placed to provide solutions to customers affected by these delays, and we are seeing continued strength in this area as a result. Cargo demand also continues to be robust, notwithstanding the recent normalization of shipping rates over the past few months. It's worth noting that the underwriting case for cargo aircraft was never predicated on those super normal lease rates being sustained. They were certainly beneficial for placements in the last few quarters, but the real change in that area is the improved quality and breadth of customers looking to lease cargo aircraft. Much of the historical cyclicality in cargo leasing was reflective of the binary nature of many of the operators, which were either very strong, well-capitalized airlines, our start-up, high-growth opportunistic ones.

What we are seeing now is the filling out of the middle where the commercial benefits of managing your supply chain in-house are becoming increasingly important, and cargo aircraft are seen as another part of the critical infrastructure of very large companies. In light of this, we placed firm orders for 15 Airbus A321 passenger-to-freighter aircraft conversions with EFW, with an option for a further 15 units, which are expected to begin delivery in 2023 through 2025. This aircraft is the best-in-class and most fuel-efficient aircraft to replace the Boeing 757-200 freighter. So we expect to see strong demand for these aircraft.

On the helicopter side, we continue to see increased activity with 24 leases signed in the quarter, 3 purchases and 3 sales. Again, we witnessed broad-based demand, which shows our global reach. We completed lease agreements with operators in Australia, Europe, South America, North America and middle East. This increasing demand, coupled with our focus on improving terms and extending tenor should provide more reliable and resilient returns in this business going forward. So moving back to passenger aircraft. The demand for narrow-body aircraft preceded the first leg of the recovery and it's proven to be a reliable forward-looking indicator on travel recovery. I expect the demand that we are currently seeing for wide-body aircraft will continue to drive the recovery. I believe it's important to consider that while passenger traffic is still well below 2019 levels, supply constraints are already occurring. As a result, airlines are seeing higher yields in revenues. In fact, IATA forecast that worldwide airline revenues will reach $782 billion this year. This equates to 93% of 2019 revenues on only 82% of traffic. Bringing all this together, the supply side dynamics are going to persist.

Traffic demand continues to surprise to the upside, and leasing costs form a relatively small part of an airline's total cost. As such, I expect that the environment for aircraft leasing will continue to improve. In summary, this was another great quarter for AerCap with earnings and cash flows remaining strong throughout the business. The market environment continues to improve. And as you'll have seen from this quarter, the financial impact is already beginning to come through. As we sit here now, 12 months on from the closing of the GECAS acquisition, we are optimistic about the future. We have come through COVID, the Russian aircraft write-off and we have still hit our target debt equity ratio ahead of schedule.

As we look forward, it is clear to me that the resilience and stability of our industry is becoming more and more apparent. And AerCap will be in an even healthier position to provide great support to our customers and strong returns to our shareholders. With that, I will hand the call over to Pete for a detailed review of our financial performance and our increased guidance for the full year.

Thanks, Gus. Good morning, everyone. We had a very strong performance in the third quarter. Our adjusted net income was $537 million or $2.21 per share. The impact of purchase accounting adjustments, which include lease premium amortization and maintenance rights amortization, was $123 million in the third quarter, including a reduction to revenue of approximately $80 million and an increase in leasing expenses of $43 million. We also had transaction and integration-related expenses of $4 million for the quarter. Taking all of those into account, our GAAP net income for the quarter was $440 million or $1.82 per share. I'll spend a few minutes going through the main drivers that affected our results for the third quarter.

Basic lease rents were $1.47 billion for the quarter, a slight increase from the strong results in the second quarter. Our basic lease rents reflected $51 million of lease premium amortization during the third quarter. As I've mentioned on previous calls, the lease premium asset is amortized over the remaining term of the lease and reduces basic lease rents. Maintenance revenues for the quarter were $120 million. That reflects $30 million of maintenance rights assets that were amortized to maintenance revenue during the quarter. In other words, maintenance revenues would have been $30 million higher or around $150 million without this amortization.

Net gain on sale of assets was $69 million for the quarter-- during the third quarter, we sold 17 of our owned aircraft, 10 of our owned engines and 3 helicopters for a total of $373 million. So that represents a gain on sale margin of 23% for the quarter. Our other income was $62 million for the quarter, which included $29 million of proceeds from unsecured claims. This is primarily related to recoveries on our unsecured claim related to AeroMexico. Leasing expenses were $161 million for the quarter, including $43 million of purchase accounting amortization expenses.

Equity and net earnings of investments under the equity method was $45 million for the quarter. That was mainly driven by continued strong earnings from Shannon Engine Support, our joint venture with Safran, which is our largest equity investment. SES has been generating strong performance this year, driven by the engine supply and demand factors that Gus mentioned in his remarks. We continue to maintain a strong liquidity position. As of September 30, our total sources of liquidity were approximately $17 billion, which resulted in the next 12-month sources-to-uses coverage ratio of 1.7x and excess cash coverage of $7 billion.

Our total operating cash flow was approximately $1.1 billion for the quarter. We ended the third quarter with net debt to equity of 2.69:1, which is just below our target ratio of 2.7x. So we were able to achieve a return to target leverage earlier than expected and only 2 quarters after writing off all of our Russian assets. At the beginning of COVID in early 2020, we increased our target liquidity coverage from a above this target level as we continue to do in the third quarter. Given the strength of the recovery that we've seen and the return to normal operations by airlines in most parts of the world, we believe it's no longer necessary to maintain this higher liquidity target. So going forward, we will return to our previous target of 1.2x sources to uses coverage, while maintaining the $17 billion of liquidity sources that we currently have. We will, of course, continue to monitor the environment to make sure we always maintain a very strong liquidity position slightly from 15% last quarter. Our average cost of debt for the third quarter was 3.2%, an increase from 3% last quarter.

In October, Moody's revised its rating outlook for AerCap to positive. And this follows Fitch's revision of its outlook for aircraft to positive in June. Our goal is to achieve mid-BBB ratings from all 3 rating agencies, and both of these moves are a step in the right direction and continue our positive ratings trajectory. Given the strong performance of our business this year and the outlook for the rest of the year, we are raising our 2022 full year adjusted EPS estimates from our previous range of $6.50 to $7 to a new range of $8 to $8.50. The outperformance compared to our original estimate has been driven by a number of factors. As I mentioned earlier, we've seen a positive impact on revenue from higher cash collections as well as higher maintenance revenue. We've also seen strong performances from our engine leasing and helicopter leasing businesses. And we've had higher income from our joint venture SES, which has performed well ahead of expectations.

Our gains on sales so far this year have been larger than we expected. We've also had higher other income where we've received significant proceeds from unsecured claims. Through the first 3 quarters of this year, we've had gains on sale of $108 million and proceeds from unsecured claims of $69 million. So the combined impact of those 2 items is $176 million year-to-date. Another factor contributing to the outperformance has been mark-to-market gains on our interest rate caps. So far this year, we recognized mark-to-market gains of $67 million. So overall, this was a strong quarter for AerCap. We continue to see global travel recover higher demand for leased aircraft and improving lease rates. We're also continuing to see strong performance across all of our businesses. All of this has led to continued strong earnings and cash flows this quarter and deleveraging back to our target debt-to-equity ratio well ahead of expectations and an increase in our full year guidance. And with that, operator, we can open up the call for Q&A.

(Operator Instructions) We'll take our first question from Ross Harvey with Davy.

I was hoping that we could talk about excess capital because you've done, frankly, a very remarkable job bringing the debt to equity risk or down below 2.7 already. I'm hoping ostomate, you might talk us through your priorities around how you deploy capital I recall you would have woken up a CapEx and M&A and delevering and shareholder returns in the past and how they can fluctuate. How do you assess those at the moment? And perhaps in the case of share repurchases, just how you would think of structuring those.

Thanks, Ross. Well, on the first point, yes, indeed, we have brought down the debt equity ratio, which is a real cash flow measure to below 2.7x, as Pete mentioned, despite the challenges presented from Colwood and Russia, et cetera. That shows to me the stability and the robust nature of the business. As regards deploying excess capital, we will now begin to generate excess capital. And as we have done in the past, we're very careful stewards of that excess capital and how we deploy it. As we look today at the opportunity set that's in front of us. There's no doubt, as I've made clear before that the acquisition of our own shares is a highly attractive use of that excess capital as it is generated.

We'll take our next question from Mark DeVries with Barclays.

So the updated EPS guide for the year implies a run rate of somewhere around $2.5 a share in 4Q. Is that a fair run rate to assume heading into 2023? Or are there some nonrecurring items in there that we should think about?

Well, I think it's actually -- I mean, if you look -- we've gone 635 so far this year mark in adjusted EPS. So we're guiding to $8 million to $850 million. So that's the range there, right, which is basically $1.65 to $2.15 for the fourth quarter. And I think what we've seen in the past, and you've heard us talk about is things can move around from one quarter to another.

So we'll have to see. That's why we have a range for it. I mean there are a number of items maintenance, for instance, gains on sale, other things that could easily slip from fourth quarter -- first quarter or vice versa. So that's why we've got the range. I mean I'd say if you take the midpoint of that range, that's kind of our best estimate at the moment. But if you look at this quarter, we did have some things that were onetime items that were positive. It's like the mark-to-market gain that we got. We had very high gains on sale, a 23% margin. So if you look at the full year, that tends to -- that's about 10% for the full year, for example. So we had the unsecured claims from Aeromexico that we got in this quarter as well. So I think as you think of a normal quarter, I would remove some of those items from that.

We'll take our next question from Jamie Baker with JPMorgan.

Can you walk us through an actual example of how interest rate adjustments work for forward placements. So for an aircraft that you're going to deliver this quarter or next, I'll assume the order was placed however many years ago, but the lease, I'm guessing, was inked, I don't know, 18 to 36 months ago. So for contracts with adjustments, how much higher will the lease be as a result of set adjustment?

So what you will assume, let's say, for a standard narrow-body airplane you'll have a loan somewhere around $36 million. So $36 million is the part that's interest rate sensitive. What you want to do first is work out, okay, of that $36 million, how much do I need? How much is the interest bill going to go up each month for a 1% move in rates? So you divide $36 million by 12 to get the monthly impact and by 100 to get 1%. So $36 million divided by $1,200 is $30,000.

So what you need to be indifferent, Jamie, this is a simplistic example is for every 1% movement in rates in your contract, you need the lease rate to go up by 30,000. So to take an example, let's say, 2 years ago, we wrote a lease rate, say it was $300,000 of the lease rate and what we call the adjustment factor per 1% was $30,000. Now it will be per basis point, but stick with me with 1%. So in that time frame, if interest rates have gone from 2% to 4%, when the aircraft delivers, is the relevant index, which might be, say, the 7-year swap rate or the 5-year treasury has gone from 2% to 4%, your lease rent will go up by $60,000. -- these are obviously example number illustrative numbers.

Yes. Yes. No, of course. Because it's a question I get rather often from your investors? And second, last quarter, your forward 12-month CapEx was $5 billion this quarter at $6 billion. I realize we're mixing time periods here. But I guess I'm just surprised with the OEM challenges. I mean, this can't be an implicit acknowledgment that OEMs are putting their houses in order because it doesn't sound like they are. Is this just modeling noise?

I would say... On that, Jamie, we will have to see how that delivery profile actually plays out with the OEMs as we get into 2023. The OEMs provide guidance to us every few months on the delivery profile. Personally, I think it's more likely than not, but that will shift out to the right of this, but we have to wait until we get the guidance from the OEMs. But certainly, as you saw in my comments earlier on, there are stresses that aren't immediately obvious to everybody in the supply chain, both for production of aircraft and the maintenance of those aircraft and those engines. You must remember that there's a finite supply of parts that go into an airframe or an engine. But the engine is the easier one to understand. When the engine comes off wing prematurely, the engine manufacturer is typically on the hook under their flight hour agreements to compensate the airline for lost flying time of the airplane that can no longer fly while the engine is in the shop.

So if you're the engine OEM, what you want to do is get that airplane back in the air very quickly. The engine OEM typically doesn't make money when the airplane is delivered to the customer. They make money or lose money over the life of the engine post delivery, which is in sharp contrast to the airframe OEM. So when there's a shortage of parts, which there is, and if engines are coming off line faster than expected, the bias of the engine OEM in self-interest will be trying to divert as much parts as they can to the MRO shops, not production engines. So I think we've yet to see all of this play out over the course of the next couple of years, but it is a factor that's out there.

That's great, us. And if I could just super quick third one slide it in. In relation to the question prior to this, would you consider share repurchases with excess capital before securing rating agency upgrades? I'm just curious how you're prioritizing the upgrades.

Sure. So look, as we look at it, I mean, we've got positive outlooks for Moody's and Fitch right now, which is very good. We're clearly on a positive trajectory with both of those. And hopefully, we can get those over the line, get upgraded. But we've been very clear with all the rating agencies that our target leverage ratio was 2.7:1. That's what we're going to manage the business to. And when we have excess capital, we'll plan to distribute it up to that level. So it's not we're not going to wait for the rating agencies, which we don't control. I mean that will come or it won't. We're hopeful that it will. But all we can do is just manage the business and use the excess capital when we've got it.

And I would bear in mind, Jamie, of course, in that regard that, that was our target ratio coming into COVID, which we are at, and that was a ratio that was well able to get us through coal, but then indeed not just survive it but thrive in it.

We'll take our next question from Moshe Orenbuch with Credit Suisse.

Given the really strong gain on sale that you had, and I don't know whether that was unusually strong or not, but I guess -- and the answers to the previous questions, are there ways to kind of accelerate the ability to buy back stock just given both where the stock trades and the ownership structure at this point, given that you're now below your leverage target and the sale market is as strong as it is.

Well, Moshe, thanks very much. We've always been very clear that the #1 task here to make sure the balance sheet is rock solid before we distribute any capital, and that is unchanged. You are right that we've had very strong gain on sale in the quarter just gone. As Pete highlighted, that was higher than usual. Normal is around 10%. And in this quarter, it was over 20% of margin. Of course, we're always looking to see what else we can do that makes sense for the long term of the business.

Yes. And I'll just add, Moshe, I mean as we look at the fourth quarter, we do have a fair amount of sales we estimated before that we would have $2 billion of sales this year, and I still think we'll be around that target. But we'll have to see if all those come in or some slip. Got you.

Maybe just as a follow-up, Gus, you talked quite a bit about the environment for the engine market. Are there ways for AerCap to benefit -- obviously, you're benefiting quite handsomely right now, but are there ways that you can kind of even extend that? Or is there anything you can do to make to make that even kind of a larger and bigger contributor?

It is a significant contributor already. The obvious one you see is the benefit of the SES, but there's tremendous synergies that come through the business as well through our technical line in managing our own engine shop visits. We have, of course, by some distance, the leading engine leasing franchise in the world by quite a distance, maybe by a factor of 3x. And we certainly want to make sure we maintain that global leading position in the engine business as this technology matures.

We'll take our next question from Hillary Cacanando with Deutsche Bank.

So now that you've exceeded your leverage target, I would assume the rating agencies will probably be revisiting your rating. Could you just go over what they would be focused on? Obviously, one of the focus point was the leverage ratio. But what else do you think they'll be looking at for a potential upgrade?

Well, I think on the metrics Hilary, that we meet all of the metrics as -- when we talk about that with the rating agencies, I think the real thing for them to think about that they'll consider and could affect the timing here is just the overall macro environment, right? And so -- but I think metrics-wise, I think we're there on all of the metrics as far as we know based on our discussions with them. And I do think leverage was the main one. Obviously, we committed to get back down to our target leverage ratio. We had committed to doing that after the GECAS transaction. We got there by the end of last year, but then we had the whole Russian situation that obviously brought it up. So I think I agree with you now that we're back there. I think we are in line on all of the metrics and it's really just a question of looking out at the macro environment, how do they feel about that.

Okay. Got it. And then I just have one more follow-up question. You've previously said that renewal rates have picked up due to the lack of aircraft in the market. Could you just talk a little bit about what you're seeing for renewal lease rates? Obviously, when lease rates -- there's usually a step down, right, in these rates when customers review. But are you -- are the lease rates -- renewal lease rates actually now higher than what they normally would be, just given the current supply-constrained environment? And if so, do you expect this trend to continue for the foreseeable future?

Hillary, there's no doubt, as we said that lease rates are going up at the moment. That's a function of 2 items. Of course, you have the interest rate increase and you also have the shortage of certain types of aircraft as well. We expect that the shortage of aircraft will persist for quite some time into the future relative to demand. And of course, look, there is still one very large market out there that has not yet opened. But in time, it will, which is the Chinese market, of course. Now we're not saying that will happen today or tomorrow, but over some period of time in the future, it will. And this is a long-cycle business. So you do have to look into the future. An important data point for yourselves is the amount of aircraft that airlines are buying office is higher than ever. The airlines also know the challenges that Boeing and Airbus face. And what they are doing now for the first time, almost 40% of our aircraft sales are to airlines. Airlines are buying airplanes also said they thought they would be exiting a 20-year-old, A320, 737, et cetera. So that's a very good indicator of the likely longevity of the supply issues.

We'll take our next question from Ron Epstein with Bank of America.

Yes. Just maybe a couple of quick questions. On the time on wing on engines, I mean, are you seeing the new generation CFMs, the LEAP or the GTFs, which are coming off in more prematurely?

Well, it's at the moment, probably by a bit -- a little bit, the GTFs are coming off a bit faster than the CFM at the moment. Both engines do face issues. But I would say, at the moment, slightly more weighted towards the GTF engine.

Got it. And then it's interesting yesterday at Boeing's investor conference. Calhoun came out and said in pretty low uncertain terms, they're not going to do a new narrow-body until sometime in the middle of the 2030s. I would imagine, I mean, that's probably got to be a pretty good thing for all the narrowbodies you own, right? Can you just make what does that mean for you? And what does that mean for the residual value of your fleet if there's no impending threat of anything new coming out to replace them?

Clearly, Ron, it enhances the residual values of all those aircraft that we have. As you've heard me say in the past, I think it would be an error to launch a new airplane now without the engine technology being able to provide any new airframe with the type of operational savings that would persuade an airline to switch out of a very good airplane such as a MAX 8 or an A320neo, both are excellent aircraft.

So in that regard, the danger would have been to me, if they were to launch a new airplane with suboptimal technology, the other side would say, don't touch that airplane. Wait for me, you have a very good airplane with me, wait for me, I'll have the LEAP change in technology, No pun-intended in the mid-30s, and you will regret ever taking a suboptimal aircraft. And history has always shown that to be true. Panic decisions to build airplanes suboptimal always end in tiers. And I think Dave Calhoun is obviously an extremely experienced executive in the industry and knows and have seen all the mistakes made by various airframers over the years. And to my mind, it is most definitely the right decision for all concerned.

Got it. And then maybe just one last quick reference. -- question. Are you seeing a customer preference for A320s or 737s? On the MAX, the MAX an excellent airplane. The real bounce back there on the MAX 8 and we see parity now on lease rates between the MAX 8 and the 320neo something, of course, we hadn't seen up until the last few months. So really good demand there in the MAX 8. But where Airbus has the lead is on the 321, the capability of it, but that must be tempered by the fact that many airlines don't actually fly the aircraft to the limits to the edge of the envelope. Many airlines don't need to do -- don't need as much airplane as a 321 offers. But there's no question that 321 has the lead there over the competing growing products. And I would say, to be balanced on the wide-body side, while the 330neo is a very good airplane, the 787-9 has the lead there as well.

We'll take our next question from Vincent Caintic with Stephens.

2 questions. So first, I appreciate the updated guidance and the implied fourth quarter and understanding that there were some maybe onetime items or some moving parts over the past 3 quarters. But when I think about the lease rates and also the expenses that you've had so far, just wanted to get a sense of whether the third quarter is a good jumping off point when we can. Second question, just wanted to follow up on the insurance claims and what -- any update in terms of the proceeds and the timing when we think about the resolution of the rest of the lease claims?

Well, just on the first point, Vincent, yes, so I think the third quarter is good, but I would look at those items like the unsecured claims that we got through that came in like the mark-to-market. And then on the gain side, that's really dependent on the mix of aircraft that we sell. So I think you have to look at sort of all of those things when you normalize it and think of what a run rate would be. But other than that, yes, I mean I'd say that's most of the other items. I mean, depreciation, as you know, doesn't move around very much leasing expenses and maintenance can move around and quarter-on-quarter quarter. In a quarter...

As regards to the insurance proceeds, we can't comment on that. I'm sorry, Vincent.

Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes today's question-and-answer session. At this time, I'd like to turn the conference back to Aengus Kelly for any additional or closing remarks.

Thank you all very much for joining us on the call, and we look forward to discussing our full year results with you in the New Year.

Ladies and gentlemen, this does conclude today's conference. We appreciate your participation. You may now disconnect.