Guidewire Software Inc (GWRE) 2014 Q1 法說會逐字稿

Good day and welcome to the Guidewire first-quarter fiscal 2014 financial results conference call. Today's conference is being recorded. At this time, I would like to turn the conference over to Karen Blasing, Chief Financial Officer. Please go ahead.

Good afternoon, and welcome to Guidewire Software's earnings conference call for the first quarter of fiscal 2014, which ended on October 31. This is Karen Blasing, Chief Financial Officer of Guidewire, and with me on the call is Marcus Ryu, Guidewire's Chief Executive Officer.

A complete disclosure of our results can be found in our press release issued today, as well as in our related Form 8-K furnished to the SEC. To access the press release and the financial details, please see the Investor Relations section of our website at www.Guidewire.com. As a reminder, today's call is being recorded, and a replay will be available following the conclusion of the call.

During today's call, we will make statements related to our business that may be considered forward-looking under federal securities laws. These statements reflect our views only as of today, and should not be reflected upon as representing our views as of any subsequent date. We disclaim any obligation to update any forward-looking statements or outlook. These statements are subject to a variety of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from expectations. These risks are summarized in the press release that we issued today.

For a further discussion of the material risks and other important factors that could affect our actual results, please refer to our annual report on Form 10-K for the period ended July 31, 2013, our quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 30, 2013, and our registration statement on Form S-3, filed with the SEC on October 21, 2013, each of which are on file with the SEC.

Also, during the course of today's call we will refer to certain non-GAAP financial measures. A reconciliation schedule showing GAAP versus non-GAAP results have been provided in our press release, issued after the close of market today. Additionally, we are providing detailed reconciliation data as well as recurring revenue calculations in a supplement posted on our IR website at IR.Guidewire.com

Finally, at times in our prepared comments or responses to your questions, we may offer incremental metrics to provide greater insight into the dynamics of our business, or our quarterly results. Please be advised that this additional detail may be one-time in nature, and we may or may not provide an update in the future. With that, let me turn the call over to Marcus for his prepared remarks, and then I will provide details regarding our financial results and our outlook.

Thanks, Karen. We are off to a solid start in fiscal 2014, with both revenue and profitability exceeding our expectations for the first quarter.

Total revenue of $66.5 million increased 5% from a year ago, and exceeded our expectations on the license and services revenue lines. I would point out that our first quarter tends to be our lightest in revenue, due to the seasonal pattern of our sales year, and our anniversary billings, which happen each year. Year-over-year growth was also impacted by $5 million in nonrecurring catch-up revenue that we recognized in the first quarter of 2013. Excluding this amount, our first-quarter revenue increased 14% from a year go. While we continue to invest in our long-term growth across a number of sales and product initiatives, our revenue upside in the quarter fell to the bottom line, resulting in a non-GAAP operating loss that was $10 million better than our guidance. As always, we focus on generating recurring term license revenue, from license and maintenance fees, and we measure our progress on those key metrics on a rolling four-quarter basis. At the end of the first quarter, this figure totaled $148.5 million, and it represents year-over-year growth of 29%.

During Q1, we closed a number of notable transactions across all our product lines, and in multiple geographies. I would like to share two examples of the deals we closed. For example, Amerisure, a Michigan-based insurer writing workers compensation and commercial insurance, who has chosen ClaimCenter to be deployed across all of their lines of business. Another quite significant win in the quarter was with Direct Line Group, or DLG, one of the largest personalized insurers in the UK. DLG had been a ClaimCenter customer since 2009, and they are now a full InsuranceSuite customer, with the addition of PolicyCenter and BillingCenter. Along with AVIVA UK, announced last year, this is our second major PolicyCenter win in the sophisticated UK market.

Replacing the operational systems of record that run an insurance company almost always requires a lengthy sales process, especially for the largest insurers. However, Guidewire continues to gain market share, and we see good validation of the investments we have made in expanding our customer-facing teams over the last two years. Positive indicators include an expanding sales pipeline, especially in Europe, a high competitive win rate, and more engagement with large Tier 1 carriers.

Turning to products, we continue to invest in technology to reinforce the basis for our leadership position. Our customary venue to announce and elaborate on these investments is Connections, our annual user conference in October, which this year topped 1,000 attendees, with over a 40% increase in customers and prospects from a year ago. At Connections, we announced the launch of InsuranceSuite 8, the latest version of our unified core systems suite, which we believe continues to widen our differentiation from patchwork vendors and custom development competitors. InsuranceSuite 8 offers a significantly enhanced user interface, multi-currency support for global insurers, and multiple suite-level features for sophisticated market segmentation, underwriting, and policyholder service.

We also announced product initiatives to further extend our value proposition beyond legacy system replacement alone. These include mobile and portal applications built on top of InsuranceSuite, in which customers have shown strong interest, given the consumer shift to mobile form factors, and the potential for supplier and customer self-service via real-time portals. We have our first few customers for these applications, and expect to sign more over the coming quarters.

We also shared progress on Guidewire Live, our data-focused SaaS initiative, introduced about a year ago, which continues to gain momentum beyond the over 25 insurers we announced last quarter, as contributing their operational data on a daily basis. While revenue is still modest, we converted three additional customers to paying licenses for Guidewire Live during the first quarter. We anticipate more conversions to come, as insurers see the value of data visualization to respond to natural disasters, and as insights from comparative metrics of performance, benefits which are achieved through Guidewire Live with essentially zero implementation effort.

The third initiative that extends our capabilities beyond core systems software is data management. Along with InsuranceSuite 8, we announced new versions of Data Hub and InfoCenter, our operational data store, or ODS, and business intelligence solutions. Today, DataHub and InfoCenter help P&C insurers accelerate legacy system replacement, and consolidate and analyze core data from their enterprise systems, with InsuranceSuite foremost among them, of course.

After the close of the first quarter, American Modern, a large specialty insurer, became our launch data management customer, licensing both DataHub and InfoCenter. Like many other customers, they previously added PolicyCenter and BillingCenter to augment their ClaimCenter selection. Data management is a universal and strategic need, and we are optimistic that American Modern will be followed by other Guidewire customers in the quarters and years ahead.

The other pillar of our differentiation, besides technology, is our delivery track record. During the first quarter, we had 12 initial go-lives, including four major PolicyCenter go-lives. That's a quarterly record for total go-lives in a quarter, and nearly half as many as we completed in all of fiscal 2013.

As we described last quarter, and further at our Analyst Day, as our business continues to scale, our SI partners are steadily enhancing their capabilities and credentials, providing customers with a healthy ecosystem of options, as they implement Guidewire's products. While the preponderance of the work on each of our projects is completed by the customer, and/or an SI partner, our own services organization plays a critical role in ensuring customer success. We do expect the larger Guidewire services participation in the newer frontiers of our business, namely, Europe, Tier 1 customers, and our new product initiatives, such as portals and data management. Notwithstanding that, we are pleased by the continuing traction of our SI partners, and our business model focus is squarely on recurring license and maintenance revenue.

One other point to mention on the subject of systems integrators, Capgemini, one of our longest-standing partners, launched its platform as a service, for P&C insurers, based on the Guidewire InsuranceSuite. The Capgemini solution provides P&C insurers with a subscription-based fully hosted and preconfigured solution for a subsegment of insurers in North America, and may be expanded over time to cover additional lines of business in both North America and the UK.

Finally, I am pleased to share that we recently recruited a new Head of Worldwide Sales. Scott Roza comes to Guidewire with a background of leading complex sales organizations and driving strategic initiatives. He brings an acute business intellect to the leadership team, as well as the ability to authentically represent our values and distinctiveness to customers worldwide. Scott spent the last five years as CEO of Skytap, a provider of cloud automation solutions, where he led the company through five consecutive years of growth. Prior to that role, Scott was VP of Worldwide OEM and Channel Sales for HP's Opsware's business service automation business unit. While I plan to spend nearly as much time customer-facing as I do today, Scott will now be directly responsible for the sales and presales organizations, as well as other growth initiatives that we are evaluating. We look forward to Scott's contributions in scaling our business on a global basis.

In summary, our first quarter was a solid start to the fiscal year. Our pipeline of new business is building, and we are increasing our full-year revenue expectations by $2 million. We continue to build momentum in our mission to transform the $2 trillion global P&C insurance industry with world-class software, starting by replacing that legacy core and expanding the transformational frontiers in data, self-service, and the claim supply chain. We believe it is very early days in our opportunity, and that our strategy of industry focus, technology leadership, and commitment to customer success is on track.

I will turn over the call now to Karen to discuss our financial results, and elaborate on our outlook. Karen?

Thank you, Marcus. We're pleased to report that our results for the first quarter exceeded our revenue and earnings expectations, in what has historically been our seasonally weakest quarter. As we have discussed in the past, and our historical results demonstrate, a significant portion of our term contracts were originally signed, and had their annual anniversary license and maintenance payments due in our fiscal fourth quarter.

Total revenue was $66.5 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2014, a 5% increase from a year ago. As a reminder, revenue in the first quarter of 2013 included $5 million in catch-up revenue, representing final catch-up revenue from historic transactions. Excluding these catch ups, total revenue increased 14% from a year ago.

Looking at the details, license revenue of $18.9 million was down 9%, compared to a year go. Excluding $3.2 million in catch-up license revenue in the year-ago period, license revenue was up 7% from a year ago. In addition, we previously shared that our first quarter of FY13 also benefited from two relatively large transactions, that made Q1 a more challenging comparison for growth. Revenue in Q1 did not include the impact of DLG and Amerisure. While those deals were signed in Q1, the revenue will be recognized in Q2.

Maintenance revenue, which is recognized ratably through the year, was $9.6 million for the first quarter, up 3% from a year ago, and in line with expectations. Service revenue was $38 million, up 15% from a year ago, and it was primarily driven by an additional $4.4 million related to implementation of our software. This growth reflects a small number of contracts where we are the lead contractor, with the SI partners subcontracting to us. Geographically, the US represented 56% of revenue in the first quarter, with 44% of revenue coming from outside the US.

Turning to expenses. We will discuss our profitability measures on both a GAAP and non-GAAP basis, and we have provided a reconciliation of these in our earnings press release issued today, which is also on our website, with the primary difference being stock-based compensation expenses.

Non-GAAP gross profit in the first quarter of $31.9 million represented a gross margin of 48%, a decrease from a year ago, due to a number of factors that we previously anticipated. By line item, non-GAAP gross margin for license was 97.7%, compared to 99.2% a year ago, as the costs of Guidewire Live are considered cost of license revenue.

Non-GAAP gross margin for maintenance of 83.2% decreased approximately 3 percentage points from a year ago, due to headcount growth to support an increased number of our customers. Non-GAAP gross margin for services of 14.4%, compared to 29.9% in the prior-year. The difference was due primarily to $1.7 million in high-margin catch-up services revenue in the prior-year, an increase in external consultants contracted to support prime contract fee arrangements, service headcount growth over the last 12 months, and infrastructure costs.

Turning to operating expenses, total non-GAAP operating expenses were $35 million in the first quarter, an increase of 21% compared to a year go. Overall, we are pleased that we exceeded guidance in both revenue and operating income. The revenue dropped to the bottom line, and the careful management of our headcount and costs enabled us to exceed guidance. This resulted in a non-GAAP operating loss of $3.1 million, and non-GAAP net loss of $0.01 per share.

Turning now to our balance sheet. We ended the first quarter with $576.9 million in cash, cash equivalents, and investments, up from $207.7 million at the end of the fourth quarter, due primarily to $389.9 million in net proceeds raised from our secondary stock offering in the first quarter. We reported an operating cash outflow of $14.6 million in the first quarter, which reflects normal first-quarter seasonality. We reported a cash outflow of $16.3 million in the year-ago period. Our current deferred revenue was $39.8 million, and total deferred revenue was $43.5 million, an increase from $41.2 million at the end of the fourth quarter.

As we have shared in the past, we do not believe that deferred revenue is a meaningful indicator of business activity during the quarter, since we typically bill term license contracts annually, and recognize the full annual payment upon the due date. Further, our multi-year contracts, combined with our annual payment terms, mean that a significant amount of our contractually committed fees are not visible on our balance sheet. We believe that the combination of this contracted business and best-in-class renewal rates provides us with a high level of visibility towards 2014 revenue today.

Now, I'd like to turn to our outlook, starting with a high-level perspective. Consistent with our prior messaging, we are continuing to follow through with the strategy that has driven our recent success. We are continuing to invest in sales and marketing to improve coverage and to build pipeline. At the same time, we continue to enhance our existing products and bring new technology to market through modest engineering headcount growth. We expect to see modest service revenue growth this year. Though as Marcus mentioned, they will be targeted more heavily in deployments in Europe, at Tier 1 customers, and with new products, such as data management.

With that backdrop, for the second quarter of fiscal 2014, we anticipate total revenue to be in the range of $76 million to $78 million, representing year-over-year growth of 7%. Keep in mind that in the second quarter of fiscal 2013, we recognized $4.5 million in revenue from early payments that were due in the third quarter, and we anticipate that these payments will be due and payable in this Q3. Within revenue, we expect license revenue to be in the range of $29 million to $31 million, maintenance revenue of approximately $10 million, and services revenue in the range of $36 million to $38 million. Perpetual license revenue is expected to be in line with last year.

For the second quarter, we anticipate non-GAAP operating income of between breakeven and $2 million, and non-GAAP net income of between breakeven and $1.4 million, or breakeven to $0.02 per share, based on a fully-diluted share count of 72.3 million shares, which includes our follow-on offering of 8.3 million shares. Our non-GAAP operating income and net income expectations exclude approximately $18.2 million in stock-based compensation expense, and $0.4 million in amortization of intangible assets in the second fiscal quarter. Including these non-cash expenses, we anticipate a GAAP operating loss between $18.5 million and $16.5 million for the second fiscal quarter. We anticipate a GAAP net loss of between $11.3 million to $10.1 million, or an EPS loss of $0.17 to $0.15 per share, based on an estimated weighted average basic share count of 67.4 million shares. We anticipate an effective non-GAAP tax rate of approximately 32%, and a GAAP tax rate of approximately 39% in the second quarter.

Looking at full-year fiscal 2014, we are increasing our revenue expectations to reflect our Q1 upside and the strength of our overall pipeline. We anticipate total revenue for 2014 to be in the range of $330.5 million to $342.5 million, an increase of $2 million from our prior guidance range of $328.5 million to $340.5 million, representing a revenue increase of 12% from fiscal 2013 at the midpoint. Within revenue, we believe license revenue will be in the range of $145.5 million to $149.5 million, an increase of 18% to 21% from fiscal 2013. Most importantly, we continue to expect term licenses to grow above 20%, even with more challenging comparisons caused by the incremental revenue contribution from new Tier 1 customers in 2013. It is also important to highlight that we now expect perpetual license revenue to be less than fiscal 2013, and our license revenue seasonality is generally weighted toward Q4. We expect maintenance revenue to be in the range of $41 million to $43 million, an increase of 9% to 15%. We anticipate services revenue in the range of $144 million to $150 million, an increase of 3% to 8%.

We anticipate full-year non-GAAP operating income in the range of $20.5 million to $25.5 million, an increase from our prior guidance range of $18.2 million to $22.2 million, and representing a non-GAAP operating margin of 7%, at the midpoint of our revenue and operating income guidance. And we anticipate non-GAAP net income in the range of $13.9 million to $17.4 million, or $0.20 to $0.25 per share, based on a fully diluted share count of 70.4 million shares. We anticipate an effective non-GAAP tax rate of approximately 32% for the full year.

On a GAAP basis, which includes $66.2 million of stock-based compensation expense and $1.4 million in amortization of intangible assets, we anticipate a fiscal 2014 operating loss of between $47.1 million and $42.1 million, a net loss of $28.7 million to $25.7 million, or an EPS loss of $0.44 to $0.39, based on an estimated weighted average basic share count of 65.9 million shares. We anticipate an effective GAAP tax rate of approximately 39% for the full year.

In summary, we are off to a solid start in 2014, with strong first-quarter results and key wins already in for the second quarter. We remain focused on executing against our growth strategies in order to extend our leadership position in the large market that we serve. We expect that this leadership will continue to fuel recurring revenue growth, and expanding profitability in the years ahead. Operator, can you now open the call for questions?

(Operator Instructions)

Sterling Auty with JPMorgan.

Maybe you could start with, the services revenue came in better than anticipated. You mentioned the go-lives in the quarter. How do you manage the headcount as they roll-off of those go-lives? Do they automatically roll into other projects, do you keep them on the payroll and manage it, so we get a little bit more of a gross margin hit for next quarter, versus the investment that you talked about in Tier 1, Europe, et cetera.

No clear pattern on the transition of services personnel after a go-live, for a couple reasons. Sometimes the initial go-live is only one milestone on a much longer journey, where there will be multiple phases afterwards. It is frequently the case that our participation tapers over time, and eventually drops to near zero. From whatever it might have been at the initial project, but there can also be a substantial tail from that go-live that doesn't make it a -- discontinuous event.

Also, even in those cases where there is only one phase, there is often a meaningful tail of other activities that could go on at the customer. The go-live is just one milestone. It's a very significant one, obviously. The customer cares about it, but it does not show up in any evident pattern in services directly.

Your larger question is how do we manage utilization, in the context where, by design, we don't want to stay at customers for longer than necessary. And that's just a question of managing the whole portfolio of existing customers and new anticipated ones.

Fortunately, as we have more engagement, more customers, more prospects, at least in principle, we should have -- that portfolio should get easier to manage. The other challenge that sometimes confounds that, as we talked about in the prepared remarks, is that we have business in different parts of the world, new products, and so forth. That's a juggling act that we don't anticipate getting simpler anytime soon.

Got you. One follow-up, you mentioned the newer solution, especially on the portal side. You got a couple customers, you anticipate more to come in the coming quarters. How are those deals structured? What kind of size are those deals, and what does the pipeline look like?

Structure-wise, they are software products, just like our core systems applications. They are generally -- they all require that you implemented one of our core applications first, but once you have, we have a very compelling value proposition for them. They're sold on a recurring term license basis, and there is a per-premium charge, basis point charge, exactly same in structure to InsuranceSuite.

In terms of overall pricing, they are some fraction, depending on the specific use case and the scope of the big core applications. None of them in themselves are as yet as big as a ClaimCenter, let alone a PolicyCenter; they're some portion of that.

But also, the pricing is early, and with every one of our products, there is a pattern. As more people adopt it, the price, we generally improve pricing over time. Those are all the factors, but structurally, exactly the same as our other products.

Thank you.

Brent Thill with UBS.

Marcus, if you could maybe characterize the pipeline as you look at it today. I think you mentioned there's some notable opportunities in Europe that you are seeing. If you could just give us a sense of any changes you are seeing in the sales cycles or the initial commitment, and maybe put it into perspective, versus what you have seen over the last six months, and how that has changed.

Sure. It is always a complex picture, with things on both sides of the ledger, but some clear facts, that I hang my hat on, when I think through the demand is, our team is by far the busiest it has ever been. Our pre-sales team is maxed out in customer engagements and evaluations.

That is pretty much true across all territories for us. That's obviously good news, in terms of the level of demand and engagement we are getting. I think that our visibility, our credential, our general stature in Europe has increased significantly over the last year, and that's partly from investments, partly from some go-lives, partly from team and leadership.

So that has all been very encouraging. And we are certainly in a lot of discussions with some very big insurers, as is essential for our business model, and for it to be the case.

All that is constructive, as well as new -- a lot of other conversations that go along with the newer products. There is discussions around Live, around data management, around own portals, and each of these are new dimensions of the conversation that we have had before. Those are all positives.

On the other side, of course, the sales cycles have not gone markedly easier. They are as demanding as ever. I think overall industry economic conditions are no better or worse than they have been; but overall, the insurance industry reflects the overall macro economy, and it's not a time of fantastic abundance for insurers anymore. They look at these capital investments very carefully, and the sales cycles remain just as arduous, even as our credentials have improved steadily over time.

Just a quick follow-up on the sales process. In Q1, you and a number of companies you usually use that as an opportunity to realign. Any major changes; obviously, the addition of Scott? Is there anything that you are looking at in terms of the go-to-market that changes, or is it more of the same?

More evolutionary than revolutionary. Scott is a great add to the team. It doesn't actually change my degree of commitment to the customer engagement. It just increases the bandwidth that we have, these kind of principal-to-principal connections that are so important for our strategic sale.

We're steadily adding to the team pretty much across all functions. We need new competencies, especially talk about the data and the iDomains, that, in a way, it's adjacent, but different from what we do with the core systems. So, steady increases in investment in the team to cover the demand and to meet our growth targets.

Thank you.

Nandan Amladi with Deutsche Bank.

Question on the services mix, touching on Sterling's question, I think. The level of services increase that you are expecting for the specific focus areas that you talked about. Is that much more than you were expecting at the beginning of the year? And how long does it stay that way?

It's relatively the same, as we really talked about on the fourth quarter-earnings announcement, as well. We have put an awful lot of investments into Europe, in the sales and marketing team there, so it behooves us to ensure that we've got the right consulting services model there, as well, to support Keith and his team, as they work that pipeline, and work to close deals.

The same thing, really, with the data management and portal projects, so we are putting engineering dollars and efforts toward that. It is in our best interest, and I think in our customers' best interest as well, to ensure that we have a consulting team that's experts in those products, and that they get launched very successfully. It's very much of a continuation down the exact same strategic path.

Nandan, one thing I'll add to that is it's always been an operating principle with us that we don't want to have license sales that are gated by our ability to implement. And as we increase the product portfolio, and we want to be sure, especially with the newer ones, that we are not the constraint on adoption in any way.

That does require us to have some capacity, to invest in some capacity to make sure that we can meet the demand that we are trying to generate. Just another parameter that we have to think about in managing the overall services team. But we do expect newer products to follow the same trajectory, the same curve of involvement that we have with ClaimCenter, PolicyCenter, et cetera, where we are more involved at the beginning, and then as partners build the credentials and the capabilities to do more and more of the work over time.

Thank you, and a quick follow-up, if I might. You mentioned 12 initial go-lives in the quarter, including 4 Policy. That was half as many as you did in all of fiscal thing. Should we expect a similar trajectory for the remainder of the year?

I don't have it at my fingertips, but I think we will certainly have more go-lives this year than we did last year. That is a certainty. And there was a little bit of a clustering that happened in the quarter, and these included some very substantial major projects.

I didn't itemize a lot of them by name, but including a couple of big Suite projects, big PolicyCenter projects in other countries as well, that were extremely important for us. They're great proof points, essential proof points, I think, to compel the market that is safe to go in the water, much more important than anything we do in marketing. That trajectory remains, by far, our biggest differentiator.

Thank you.

Tom Roderick with Stifel.

So, maybe I can follow-up on Brent's question about the pipeline. And maybe, rather than a qualitative question about it, can you walk us through markets? You've been serving as head of sales, and congratulations for being able to take that hat off for now. But can you talk us through what you have seen, particularly some of your larger Tier 1, even Tier 2 deals that are working their way through the pipeline.

Are you seeing, as you go through Policy deployments or Policy engagements, that there are long proof of concepts or long pilots that are in place? Does that change if you're working with a key systems integrator like a PWC, or like a Capgemini? Maybe just take us through the process of when you get engaged on a Policy potential project, and how long that can take to convert, particularly as you are looking at Tier 1 opportunities?

Sure, so, as I think we have discussed before, there is -- broadly speaking, there are two phases to our sales cycle. There is a long process of deliberation about whether or not the company, the customer that is, is ready to make a large capital investment for core system and business transformation. And then there is the period of getting very serious in due diligence, evaluation, negotiation et cetera.

The latter part, that second phase, there's sort of a maximum compressibility on it. It still takes something like a year for a company, even once they're serious, to go through all of those steps to their full satisfaction for governance and care.

And that is broadly speaking, true, almost regardless the size of the customer, because this is just as strategic a project to a $400 million insurer as it is a $4 billion, to a $10 billion insurer. It is of similar strategic import to the decision-maker in each of those cases, and they're going to go through those steps. In many cases, requiring us to prove things that we have already done sometimes dozens or hundreds of times before, but that's just what's at stake.

There is always, almost always, some form of proof of concept. There is almost never a pilot. Though, when a project goes live, there will be a pilot period, but that's just a rollout factor. In terms of making the decision to implement the software, that's going to be a substantial chunk, with capital investment and a big team to get it done on the customer side.

So, there's a proof of concept that precedes that, but once they do the project, it's going to be for a big chunk of business. That's the only way it makes sense.

You asked one other question, Tom, which was the -- how do the dynamics work with the SIs and the sales cycle. In general, the decision is made by customers on the solution: who do they want as a technology partner, IE, the solution provider. And that is the principal decision that then drives the whole project, and the program, and ultimately, the choice of systems integrator.

For example if you were to work with Guidewire, you have a choice of multiple major SIs to work with, and that's a great strength, and I think it rebounds to the customers' benefit. If you were to work with Accenture, then you really only have one choice, and that is an increasingly important differentiator. But that choice of implementation partner almost always, it's hard for me to think of an exception, follows the choice of which solution, and that evaluation is based on technology and functional merits.

Thanks, Marcus. That's great detail. Karen, maybe on the topic of thinking about Tier 1 customers. I just want to confirm that in the context of your guidance that you're still not considering or anticipating any Tier 1 wins within that license number for this year.

And then the second part of that question is, it does look like you are pushing the models towards a very seasonally strong fourth quarter. I'd be curious as to how much visibility you have in the license component of that, because it does look like it's setting up for a very big year-on-year growth number for Q4, if I've got the model right, thinking about the seasonality.

Your question on the handicapping of the Tier 1s, of course we handicap them. They are too significant, both in the timing of them, and ultimately how much the Tier 1 decides to purchase at any one time, whether they go for a full enterprise with all products, or whether they would go for a single line of business with a single product.

Often that decision gets made at the Board level, with very senior people at those Tier 1 carriers. Really, it's at last minute. We would be foolish on our side to count on those in our guidance numbers, when they really do have that character to them. Our guidance actually, and our handicapping system really reflects that customer base.

Then you did ask about, we do seasonally expect a lot of our license revenue to be completed in the fourth quarter. It's built on a very large existing customer base of customers, who first sign their contracts in our fourth quarter, and whose anniversary dates for their fees is in that fourth quarter as well, so the fourth quarter has a big base in it already, which gives us tremendous visibility, because we know with certainty when we are expecting to invoice those customers.

Now, on top of that, we are in very close contact with our sales team. We have meetings with them every other week, and discuss the character and nature of the contracts, nature of the customers, that they are bringing though the sales cycle. What's in their forecast, what's in their pipeline and their expected time to close with it, as well.

So we keep an active management and a very active dialogue going with the sales team. The close proximity that we have to the sales team, adds in our visibility as well, to those fourth quarter achievements.

Thanks Karen, nice job.

Walter Pritchard with Citigroup.

Karen, just wondering on the guidance, if I look at your Q1 performance on services and your Q2 guide at the midpoint. Your annual guidance basically suggests that your services revenue in the second half of the year will decline, which is pretty different than what we've seen in the last two or three years. And I'm just wondering, is it truly that you do expect by that point that you'll have offloaded more of that services business, or is there an element of conservatism built into that second half decline?

There's a little bit of handicapping that goes into our service projects, as well. Clearly, our service projects are long in nature, lasting several quarters, and sometimes even a couple of years or so. But we do have a natural roll-off and those projects end before new projects are started. Clearly, our fourth quarter will be handicapped even for service projects on that side.

And there is some seasonality associated with our services. We don't bill on an eight hour day. We bill on a professional billing day, and in the second quarter with Thanksgiving, and Christmas, Hanukkah, and New Year's all happening between November and the end of January, we don't have as many professional billing days there. Typically there is a seasonal factor that affects our services revenue, as well.

Got it. And then, just on the secondary proceeds, any more commentary around, it would seem like acquisitions would be the obvious use there, given you had plenty of cash in the bank prior to raising the money. Can you talk about what you may be -- what you may be looking for on the M&A front, but how you're thinking about using that cash?

Sure. Nothing concrete to share yet, obviously, or we would have spoken to it in the prepared remarks, but we are absolutely thinking about all our growth options. It has always been our thesis that if we win the core system game and become the market share leader, industry leader in our core business, that we're going to have lots of interesting options to build upon that. And sometimes that route is best achieved through acquisition.

However, as we said during the transaction marketing, we're also thinking about internal growth initiatives, as well. We do not want to be constrained, only to think about acquisition as an option. There are some interesting possibilities there, that are also under evaluation.

And the nature of our software is, it's substantial enterprise software, and that is not built overnight, so we're talking about a substantial capital investment over, sometimes, it could be a multi-year horizon, to really go after the biggest opportunities. And we want to think seriously about those, while being mindful, of course, on the impact on our financial model.

But, we are trying to play the long game here to build a real global industry-leading company in our chosen market, and that requires a longer horizon. But, so, very much in evaluation mode, nothing yet to share, but I think we will at some point, over the coming quarters.

Great, thank you.

Brendan Barnicle with Pacific Crest Securities.

Karen, we saw rolling fourth-quarter recurring revenue decelerate against an easier comp a year ago. Can you remind us what all the puts and takes are that go into what's happening with growth on that piece of the business?

One, catch-up revenue in the first quarter of FY13 obviously rolled off, because fourth quarter now includes Q2 of fiscal 2013 through Q1. That catch-up revenue was included in the sequential quarters before that, as one factor. But, and additionally -- obviously, Brendan, that's probably the biggest factor associated with even just the small decline. I think it went down 31% to 29% on a rolling four-quarter basis.

And so, since we don't have as much of the catch-up revenue, is the 20% range the right way for us to be thinking about that rolling four-quarters revenue, going forward?

Absolutely.

Okay. And then Marcus, you mentioned some about the progress you are making on the BI and the data work on those new products. I don't remember if I heard you discuss it or not, but what's the channel plan for implementing or distributing those products and integrating those products?

It's the same direct sales force. If we're talking about Guidewire, I want to distinguish Guidewire data management from Guidewire Live. Data management is on premise, BI, enterprise data warehouse. Guidewire Live is our SaaS-based data visualization tool.

Both of them sold by our direct sales force. In the case of Live, there's no implementation, so they're instant-on, or near instant on. In the case of data management, there is implementation effort, though, of course, we expect significantly, only a fraction of what the core systems themselves take to implement.

That's actually what I was asking about. Are E&Y and your other partners ramping up on that as quickly as they are on the other products?

They all certainly see the opportunity, and they have all asked a lot about it. I think their general modus operandi is to see demand before they do a lot of prospective investment. They actually differ in their appetite for that prospective investment. Some are more entrepreneurial than others.

I think the whole theme of data -- of much richer data structure, capture of structured data, mining it for analytics insights, operational insights, these are at the absolute top of every C-level executive's agenda, at almost every insurer we talk to. The SIs certainly want to play in that demand. It's also a complex space, though, and they have a lot of investments to make beyond just Guidewire.

Great, thanks for that clarity.

We have no additional questions in our queue at this time. I would like to turn the call back over to Mr. Ryu for any additional or closing remarks.

No other remarks. Thank you all for participating in our call today, and goodbye.

That does concludes today's call. Thank you all for your participation.