Antero Midstream Corp (AM) 2022 Q3 法說會逐字稿

完整原文

使用警語:中文譯文來源為 Google 翻譯,僅供參考,實際內容請以英文原文為主

  • Operator

  • Greetings, and welcome to the Antero Midstream 3Q 2022 Earnings Conference Call. (Operator Instructions) Please note, this conference is being recorded.

  • I will now turn the conference over to your host, Dan Katzenberg, Finance Director. You may begin.

  • Dan Katzenberg

  • Thank you for joining us for Antero Midstream's third quarter investor conference call. We'll spend a few minutes going through the financial and operating highlights, and then we'll open it up for Q&A. I would also like to direct you to the homepage of our website at anteromidstream.com, where we have provided a separate earnings call presentation that will be reviewed during today's call.

  • Today's call may also contain certain non-GAAP financial measures. Please refer to our earnings press release for important disclosures regarding such measures, including reconciliations to the most comparable GAAP financial measures.

  • Joining me on the call today are Paul Rady, Chairman and CEO of Antero Resources and Antero Midstream; Brendan Krueger, CFO of Antero Midstream; and Michael Kennedy, CFO of Antero Resources and Director of Antero Midstream.

  • With that, I'll turn the call over to Paul.

  • Paul M. Rady - President, Chairman & CEO

  • Thanks, Dan. First and foremost, the third quarter was one of the more momentous quarters for Antero Midstream since our IPO in 2014. During the quarter, we generated $30 million of free cash flow after dividends and began paying down debt. We've been talking about this critical inflection point for several quarters, and it has finally arrived. Second, we announced our first organic acquisition of gathering and compression assets in the Marcellus Shale, which are highly complementary to our current assets. This acquisition is not only a strategic fit for AM but further enhances our free cash flow profile, as Brendan will discuss in his remarks.

  • To take a closer look at the acquisition, I will direct you to Slide #3 titled Marcellus Bolt-On Acquisition. We closed this $205 million acquisition from Crestwood earlier this week, and we have started integrating the asset at a number of former Crestwood employees into the AM platform. As you can see on the map, the primarily dry gas gathering and compression system is highly complementary to AM's existing footprint in the core of the Marcellus Shale. The acquisition increases Antero Midstream's compression capacity by 20% and gathering pipeline mileage by 15%.

  • Importantly, the assets have significant available capacity for growth without material capital investment. As we look at the asset, Today, we have identified over $50 million of discounted future capital avoidance through connecting the system to AM's assets and rerouting the volumes to fill underutilized compression capacity.

  • We also plan to move and reuse underutilized compressor units into the liquids-rich midstream corridor, similar to the reuse opportunity we discussed on last quarter's conference call. This results in both capital and operating expense synergies. Most importantly, the acquisition includes approximately 425 undeveloped drilling locations held by AR that will be dedicated to AM for gathering and compression. I think it's important to reiterate the significant undeveloped value and optionality, which extends AM's underlying inventory well into the 2040s.

  • In addition to this acquisition, year-to-date, Antero Resources has added approximately 60 locations through its organic leasing program. This has effectively replenished the underlying inventory at AM for all the wells completed in 2022. When you combine these 60 locations with the 425 undeveloped locations on the acquired assets, this 485 additional locations represents an incremental 6 to 7 years of highly visible economic well connects for AM.

  • Importantly, AR's organic leasing program is predictable, repeatable and cost-effective. The ability to consolidate acreage in close proximity versus acquisitions that often had scattered locations dedicated to other midstream companies provides significant capital efficiencies and long-term visibility for AM. This characteristic is unique to AM and one of the reasons we continue to generate peer-leading returns on invested capital in the mid- to high teens.

  • Now let's move on to Slide #4 titled Milestone Capital Projects Completed. This slide illustrates the major compression and high-pressure gathering projects that we've constructed over the last 18 months highlighted in green. During the second quarter, we completed Phase 1 of the Castle Peak Compressor Station, which added 160 million cubic feet a day of compression capacity in the liquids-rich midstream corridor in Tyler and Wetzel Counties. Phase 2, which will reuse underutilized compressor units, will add another 80 million cubic feet a day of capacity in 2023. During the third quarter of 2022, we finished construction on our 20-mile high-pressure pipeline from Tyler and Wetzel Counties that delivers liquids-rich gas to the Sherwood and Smithburg processing complexes.

  • With these milestone projects now complete, the stage is set for highly-visible throughput growth from the liquids-rich midstream corridor that drives EBITDA growth at AM for the next several years. In addition, AM's capital budgets will continue to decline, which will drive expanding free cash flow and declining leverage.

  • In summary, we generated significant momentum at AM during the quarter, further derisked the business model and crystallize the outlook over the long term. Our capital budgets will continue to decline, driving an expanding free cash flow profile. Our unparalleled long-term visibility gives us tremendous confidence in delivering this plan and continuing to generate shareholder value.

  • With that, I'll turn the call over to Brendan.

  • Brendan E. Krueger - CFO, VP of Finance & Treasurer

  • Thanks, Paul. I'll start my comments by briefly highlighting our ESG achievements and then move on to the quarterly results and outlook at AM.

  • Slide 5 illustrates our ESG achievements. First, Antero Midstream was recently named to the top 100 best ESG companies by Investor's Business Daily highlighting the significant strides we have committed to on the ESG front.

  • Moving to our high safety standards. Last year represented the seventh straight year without an employee lost time incident. We're incredibly proud of our employees and their relentless dedication to the health, safety and well-being of our workforce. This year, we also added Scope 1 and Scope 2 GHG emissions to our net zero goals. We anticipate achieving a 100% reduction in pipeline emissions by 2025 and net zero Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions by 2050 through increasing operational efficiencies, carbon reduction initiatives and the purchase of carbon oxides.

  • I'll finish my ESG comments with some impressive statistics from AM's water system and operations, which is the largest in Appalachia. In 2021, we reused or recycled 87% of the water used in completion. This, along with our integrated freshwater delivery system, allowed us to eliminate 16 million truck miles and 34,000 tons of CO2 equivalent compared to trucking the water. This approach is not only environmentally-friendly but reduces the impact to our local communities and is incredibly cost-efficient.

  • Now let's move on to the quarterly results on Slide 6 titled Year-Over-Year Midstream Throughput Growth. During the third quarter, AM's low-pressure gathering volumes were nearly 3 Bcf a day, a 3% increase year-over-year. Compression volumes were 2.8 Bcf a day, a 1% increase year-over-year. The year-over-year volume growth was driven by the gross production growth from the drilling partnership. Looking ahead, we expect mid-single-digit sequential throughput growth in the fourth quarter compared to the third quarter, driven by 2 months of contribution from the acquired assets. From there, we expect further acceleration of volumes in the first quarter of 2023 to drive mid-single-digit throughput growth in 2023 as compared to 2022.

  • Moving on to the water side of the business. Freshwater delivery volumes in the second -- or in the third quarter averaged 103,000 barrels per day with 18 wells serviced. In addition to servicing 18 wells for AR, we sold approximately 5,000 barrels per day to a third party that generated approximately $2 million in revenues. We continue to look for third-party business opportunities such as these to complement the steady and predictable cash flows from our primary customer, AR.

  • I'll finish my comments on Slide 7 titled Free Cash Flow Inflection Point. During the third quarter, we generated $30 million of free cash flow after dividends. With AM trending towards the lower end of our capital budget guidance, we are now expecting to be at the top end of the free cash flow guidance range. Looking to the years ahead, we expect to generate increasingly positive free cash flow after dividends. This is driven primarily by declining capital as we recently completed some of the key growth projects all discussed in his remarks. This declining capital profile allowed us to pay down debt during the quarter and gave us the confidence to finance the Crestwood acquisition on our revolving credit facility. In addition, as a result of the acquisition, we are trending above the high end of the 5-year free cash flow targets. We will look to provide more formal updates to the long-term targets when we roll out our 2023 budget. Importantly and consistent with our prior expectations, pro forma for the acquisition, we still expect to achieve the 3x leverage target in 2024. Once we achieve this target, we will be in a position to evaluate further return of capital strategies.

  • In summary, I'd like to echo Paul's earlier comments. It was a tremendous quarter from a strategic and financial standpoint in AM as we acquired strategic bolt-on assets that add several years to the underlying inventory dedicated to AM and we derisked the business model by transitioning to generating consistent, repeatable free cash flow after dividends.

  • With that, operator, we are ready to take questions.

  • Operator

  • (Operator Instructions) Our first question comes from the line of Marc Solecitto with Barclays.

  • Marc Joseph Solecitto - Research Analyst

  • So with the Shell ethane cracker starting up in August, curious your views around whether that potentially allows for a modest acceleration in drilling activity in the northeast with more ethane coming out of the residue gas stream and how that potentially affects your outlook for next year if at all.

  • Michael N. Kennedy - Senior VP of Finance & Director

  • Yes. I mean, I think when you -- if you break it down in terms of overall incremental capacity for gas in the northeast, it's about 250 a day of incremental capacity, so not really material in our view to the just overall macro environment on gas supply.

  • Marc Joseph Solecitto - Research Analyst

  • Got it. And then recognize it might be a bit early for this, but with the reference capital savings as part of the recent bolt-on acquisition in last quarter, you identified some capital savings associated with compressor relocations. So just wonder if there's any context you could provide around the CapEx outlook for next year.

  • Michael N. Kennedy - Senior VP of Finance & Director

  • Yes. I think we'll certainly provide more formal guidance. I don't think -- from what we've provided earlier, I think $215 million to $225 million was the earlier guidance. Hopefully, some tailwinds behind that, but we'll certainly come out with more formal guidance as we get further along in the year.

  • Marc Joseph Solecitto - Research Analyst

  • Got it. And then maybe if I could just squeeze one last one in here. It looks like third-party water revenues ticked up in 3Q. Just wondering if you could elaborate on that. Would you expect that to continue? And/or are there more opportunities out there?

  • Michael N. Kennedy - Senior VP of Finance & Director

  • That was a great opportunity, I think, for AM. We certainly are looking for additional opportunities like that, where you have operators that have a pad in the vicinity where we can deliver freshwater volume to them. So we'll certainly look to continue. I think given AR's large contiguous acreage position out here, there's not a lot of third-party water opportunities, but we'll certainly continue to look for some of those.

  • Operator

  • Next question comes from the line of John Mackay, Goldman Sachs.

  • John Ross Mackay - Research Analyst

  • I want to start on '22 guidance maybe, and I know you guys don't typically update kind of annual numbers quarter-to-quarter. Just wondering, though, with the close of the deal, are you looking at any offsets for EBITDA this year, maybe on the OpEx side that would kind of leave you in the current range? Or is that kind of original range intact and then we think of any deal contributions this year just on top of that?

  • Michael N. Kennedy - Senior VP of Finance & Director

  • Yes, I think we did not update the range, but we do expect to get those additional contributions, and as we talked about, do expect sequential growth as a result of that acquisition. So no change to the guidance, but certainly would have the incremental contributions on top of the guidance we provided.

  • John Ross Mackay - Research Analyst

  • Got it. Okay. And then maybe just looking forward -- actually, maybe one in the weeds here, sorry. Just on the Smithburg 2 sale or reimbursement, whatever you want to call it, is that a broader change in how you guys are thinking about this JV? Or is it really just a reflection of the fact that we're probably not going to see much more from you guys of capital in that direction? Just trying to figure out if there's a bigger thing going on here.

  • Michael N. Kennedy - Senior VP of Finance & Director

  • Yes, nothing bigger. I think that was -- it was the equipment related to Smithburg 2. We still have all the sites available should we elect to move forward with another plant down the road. But this was one -- as you look at the outlook with AR and the maintenance capital plan, you just don't need that plant. The other plants can run at about 110% of capacity, and so you've got incremental capacity should you need it without the need for Smithburg 2. So it was nonproductive capital on AM's balance sheet, so it was good to get that reimbursement of that capital in the quarter.

  • Operator

  • Our next question comes from the line of Jeremy Tonet with JPMorgan.

  • Jeremy Bryan Tonet - Senior Analyst

  • Just wanted to kind of figure some stuff out maybe at a high level of the basin. We're hearing about a number of, I guess, midstream issues in the quarter impacting a number of producers. And just wondering, is there any impact on your system that happened this quarter or might be happening in the future? And are there any mitigation plans if so? Or just any color, I guess, in general on the midstream outlook for the basin, the downstream issues that might impact you?

  • Michael N. Kennedy - Senior VP of Finance & Director

  • No. I think a lot of the issues that we've certainly heard about have been more related to the gathering and water side of the business in basin. I think they're very unique and strong distinction with AM. And its primary customer, AR, is having that integration between the 2 parties. We have not seen any of those issues. We have not -- at AR, AR has never had to defer well as a result of AM being late with infrastructure. So very unique that we can continue to predictably operate and deliver, I think, the development plans that we've laid out, where you are seeing a lot of issues with others that have more difficult, to put it nicely, I think, relationships between the upstream and midstream operators.

  • Jeremy Bryan Tonet - Senior Analyst

  • Sorry. So just to clarify then, as far as -- there's no like NGL pipelines downstream of our system? No issues on any of those assets that might impact your outlook?

  • Michael N. Kennedy - Senior VP of Finance & Director

  • No, no. We haven't had issues during...

  • Paul M. Rady - President, Chairman & CEO

  • We did have one day in early October that we referenced in the AR, but it was just a 20-hour downtime. Is that maybe what you're...

  • Michael N. Kennedy - Senior VP of Finance & Director

  • It'd be what -- yes, 7 million to 10 million a day or so.

  • Jeremy Bryan Tonet - Senior Analyst

  • Got it. That's helpful. And then pivoting, I guess, to the balance sheet, to the conversations with the agencies here. Just wondering if you could update us a little bit on outlook there. In -- AM's rating vis-a-vis where AR is and if AR is getting to a net cash position, how might that impact their road IG and AM's credit outlook as well?

  • Michael N. Kennedy - Senior VP of Finance & Director

  • Yes. So on the AR side, we did get a Fitch investment-grade rating recently in early September. We, on the S&P and Moody's front, continue to push there for the IG rating as well. So depending on when you get an upgrade there, you should see some follow-through at the AM level, but it certainly is difficult to predict when you'll get those rating upgrades from S&P and Moody's. But we do expect that to happen at some point, just don't know when that timing will occur.

  • Jeremy Bryan Tonet - Senior Analyst

  • Got it. And just a last one, if I could, with the lawsuit. Just wondering, any color there and time line going forward?

  • Michael N. Kennedy - Senior VP of Finance & Director

  • Yes. No update from what we provided before, just waiting on feedback from the court at this point.

  • Operator

  • Our next question comes from the line of Michael Cusimano with Pickering Energy Partners.

  • Michael Raphael Cusimano - Research Analyst

  • I just wanted to start if you can comment on how the AR completion schedule that I believe was accelerated some in the fourth quarter affects AM's run rate into '23.

  • Michael N. Kennedy - Senior VP of Finance & Director

  • Yes. So there's one pad that AR talked about accelerating into the fourth quarter. So really, it's about a month of -- a month move-up and when that would be placed to sale. So you'll see some sequential growth -- further sequential growth in first quarter than what you would have thought otherwise.

  • Michael Raphael Cusimano - Research Analyst

  • Okay. Got it. And then one follow-on on the Smithburg 2. Can you comment on where the buyer intends to use that equipment as a thing in basin? Or is it somewhere else or another basin?

  • Michael N. Kennedy - Senior VP of Finance & Director

  • Yes, I don't think we can comment on where that's going in particular.

  • Operator

  • And our next question comes from the line of Michael Endsley with Tudor, Pickering, Holt.

  • Michael P. Endsley - Associate of Infrastructure Research

  • Just on the OpEx front, I know that you all spoke on the AR call around the expectation that unit costs should come down in Q4 and into 2023 as variable costs related to power and fuel normalize a bit. I just wanted to get your thoughts on how much of a pullback in these kind of costs you are expecting at the AM level over the next couple of quarters and whether we should think kind of as Q1 as a good reference point as we look to Q4 or if we could see something kind of more in between the Q1 and what we've seen over Q2 and Q3.

  • Michael N. Kennedy - Senior VP of Finance & Director

  • Yes. I think overall at AM, the OpEx has been relatively consistent, so I would expect what you're seeing in Q3 would -- you'd maintain into Q4. AR is more driven by commodity prices driving fuel there. AM, I would just assume consistency from Q3 going forward.

  • Michael P. Endsley - Associate of Infrastructure Research

  • Okay. Got it. And then just following up on Michael's question. On the incremental AR pad that you're expecting, is there any possibility that those freshwater volumes could at least partially hit in Q4? Or would you expect substantially all to materialize in Q1 just given the late December time frame?

  • Michael N. Kennedy - Senior VP of Finance & Director

  • Yes. I mean, I think a lot of those volumes you already had coming in, in Q4, so you may see a little bit of incremental in Q4 but not in a material manner. You were going to complete most of those wells during Q4 to begin with. It's just being accelerated slightly.

  • Operator

  • And our next question comes from the line of Ned Baramov with Wells Fargo.

  • Ned Antonov Baramov - Senior Analyst

  • Maybe one on cash taxes. I believe in the past, you've stated you do not expect to be a cash taxpayer until the 2030s. So can you provide your updated time line in light of the 15% alternative minimum corporate tax provision in the Inflation Reduction Act?

  • Michael N. Kennedy - Senior VP of Finance & Director

  • Yes. I mean we've given our targets out through 2026 and continue to not expect to be a material cash taxpayer over that time period. I guess as we continue to roll forward targets, we'll provide more updates, but no expected material cash taxes resulted that change. At AM, you'd be below that $1 billion threshold anyway. So no expectation for that to be applicable to AM.

  • Paul M. Rady - President, Chairman & CEO

  • For the AMP threshold.

  • Michael N. Kennedy - Senior VP of Finance & Director

  • For the AMP.

  • John Ross Mackay - Research Analyst

  • Got it. And then a quick question on -- maybe if you can talk about the expected synergies from the acquisition of Crestwood's Marcellus assets. So how much of the $50 million of net present value is CapEx avoidance? I think Paul's comments noted that all of this is CapEx avoidance, but I thought there's maybe some operating synergies embedded in there. And also, what is the time line for the realization of the full suite of synergies?

  • Michael N. Kennedy - Senior VP of Finance & Director

  • Yes. So the $50 million, the vast majority of that is CapEx avoidance, not having to build a compressor station as a result of the compression capacity that we're acquiring here and being able to connect to AM's current system. And then there's a little bit in terms of just OpEx savings as a result of being able to shut down some of the capacity that was running and direct elsewhere. So of the $50 million, call it, 10% OpEx, 90% is capital avoidance.

  • Operator

  • And we have reached the end of the question-and-answer session. I'll now turn the call back over to Dan Katzenberg for closing remarks.

  • Dan Katzenberg

  • Thank you, everyone, for joining us on the call today. If you have any further questions, please reach out. Have a good afternoon.

  • Operator

  • And this concludes today's conference, and you may disconnect your lines at this time. Thank you for your participation.