威瑞信 (VRSN) 2020 Q3 法說會逐字稿

Good day, everyone. Welcome to VeriSign's Third Quarter 2020 Earnings Call. Today's conference is being recorded. Recording of this call is not permitted unless preauthorized. Now at this time, I'd like to turn the conference over to Mr. David Atchley, Vice President of Investor Relations and Corporate Treasurer. Please go ahead, sir.

Thank you, operator. Welcome to VeriSign's Third Quarter 2020 Earnings Call. Thank you to everyone for joining our call today, and we hope each of you are staying safe and healthy.

Joining me remotely from their respective locations are Jim Bidzos, Executive Chairman and CEO; Todd Strubbe, President and COO; and George Kilguss, Executive Vice President and CFO. This call and presentation are being webcast from the Investor Relations website, which is available under about VeriSign on verisign.com. There you will also find our third quarter 2020 earnings release.

At the end of this call, the presentation will be available on that site, and within a few hours, the replay of the call will be posted. Financial results in our earnings release are unaudited, and our remarks include forward-looking statements that are subject to the risks and uncertainties that we discuss in detail in our documents filed with the SEC specifically the most recent reports on Forms 10-K and 10-Q. VeriSign does not update financial performance or guidance during the quarter unless it is done through a public disclosure. The financial results in today's call and the matters we will be discussing today include GAAP results and 2 non-GAAP measures used by VeriSign, adjusted EBITDA and free cash flow.

GAAP to non-GAAP reconciliation information is appended to the slide presentation, which can be found on the Investor Relations section of our website available after this call. In a moment, Jim and George will provide some prepared remarks, and afterwards, we will open the call for your questions. With that, I would like to turn the call over to Jim.

Thanks, David, and good afternoon, everyone. Today, VeriSign reports $318 million in revenue for the quarter, up 3.1% from the same quarter a year ago. But before we dive deeper into our results, I wanted to speak just a bit about COVID-19 and how we're addressing it within VeriSign. With the increased demand for internet and online services during the COVID-19 pandemic, the secure and reliable operation of our infrastructure has become even more important. Our focus remains on our mission, which is to ensure the availability of our critical internet infrastructure for the benefit of Internet users.

We continue to operate our registry services for .com and .net, and our root operations at the rigorous standards of performance and availability governed by our agreements with ICANN, while most of our employees continue to work remotely.

Now I'll address our quarterly results. The third quarter of 2020 was another consistent quarter for VeriSign, in which we focused on our core business, expanded the domain name base and delivered solid financial results.

Regarding third quarter operational highlights. At the end of September, the domain name base in .com and .net totaled $163.7 million, consisting of $150.3 million names for .com and $13.4 million names for .net. With a year-over-year growth rate of 4%.

During the third quarter, we processed 10.9 million new registrations and the domain name base increased by 1.65 million names. Although renewal rates are not fully measurable until 45 days after the end of the quarter, we believe that the renewal rate for the third quarter of 2020 will be approximately 73.4%. This preliminary rate compares to 73.7% achieved in the third quarter of 2019 and 72.8% last quarter.

For 2020, we now expect a domain name base growth rate of between 3.5% and 4%. This updated range reflects the strength we have seen in new registrations and our expectations for domain name base growth for the remainder of the year, balanced with the ongoing uncertainty presented by COVID-19.

During the third quarter, we continued our share repurchase program that resulted in 823,000 shares of common stock repurchase to $170 million. At quarter end, $506 million remained available and authorized under the current share repurchase program, which has no expiration date.

Our financial and liquidity position remained stable with $1.15 billion in cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities at the end of the quarter. We continually evaluate the overall liquidity and investing needs of the business and consider the best uses for our cash, including potential share repurchases. And now I'd like to turn the call over to George.

Thank you, Jim, and good afternoon, everyone. As mentioned, for the quarter ended September 30, 2020, the company generated revenue of $318 million, up 3.1% year-over-year and delivered operating income of $207 million compared with $206 million in the same quarter a year ago.

Operating expenses totaled $111 million, up from $103 million in the third quarter a year ago and up from $108 million last quarter. The increase in operating expense reflects our continued investments throughout the year in personnel to support our cybersecurity and infrastructure initiatives, among other factors.

The operating margin in the quarter came to 65% compared to 66.7% in the same quarter a year ago, and 65.8% last quarter.

Net income totaled $171 million compared to $154 million a year earlier, which produced diluted earnings per share of $1.49 in the third quarter this year compared to $1.30 for the same quarter last year.

As noted in our earnings release, net income for the third quarter included a previously unrecognized income tax benefit of $24 million, which increased diluted earnings per share by $0.21 and resulted from the remeasurement of VeriSign's accrual for uncertain tax positions.

Operating cash flow for the third quarter was $140 million and free cash flow was $125 million compared with $208 million and $197 million, respectively, for the third quarter last year.

Operating cash flow and free cash flow in the third quarter were both lower, mainly due to the permitted deferral of $52 million in U.S. federal tax payments until the third quarter, which we mentioned in our last quarter's call. I will now discuss updated full year 2020 guidance.

Revenue is now expected to be in the range of $1.262 billion to $1.267 billion. This revenue range reflects the updated domain name base growth of between 3.5% and 4% that Jim mentioned earlier.

The operating margin, which includes stock-based compensation, is now expected to be between 64.75% and 65.25%. This guidance range reflects our expectation of incremental and continued investments in our operational infrastructure and security capabilities as well as sales and marketing expenses during the fourth quarter of 2020.

Interest expense and nonoperating income net is still expected to be an expense of between $75 million and $80 million. Capital expenditures are now expected to be between $45 million and $50 million.

We now expect our full year effective tax rate to be a net benefit of between 6% and 9%, which reflects the $168 million and $24 million of previously unrecognized income tax benefits recorded in the first quarter and the third quarter, respectively. Cash taxes for 2020 are still expected to be in the range of 18% to 20% of pretax income.

In summary, VeriSign continued to demonstrate sound financial performance during the third quarter and we look forward to continuing our focused execution for the remainder of 2020. Now I'll turn the call back to Jim for his closing remarks.

Thank you, George. I'd like to say again that our priorities continue to be our mission of ensuring the availability of our critical infrastructure and the safety of our people. Internet usage has increased during the pandemic and reliance on online services even more so. For many people who are working from home and isolating at home, online services are critical and more businesses and individuals than ever depend on Internet infrastructure for their livelihood.

I'd like to acknowledge the team here at VeriSign for their hard work in maintaining our critical internet infrastructure even during the pandemic. We'd like to walk through 2 questions, which we believe are on your mind before we open the call for your additional questions.

First question, are there any updates regarding your plans to use the limited pricing flexibility you have for .com? No update from what we said last quarter. We still expect to effectuate the dot-com wholesale price increase before October 25, 2021, and the prices for all of our TLDs are frozen through March 31, 2021.

Second question. Are there any updates on the status of .web? As we noted last quarter, a final hearing was scheduled in August. The hearing took place in early August. The participants, including VeriSign, then submitted their post hearing briefs. A final decision from the panel may be issued later this year or early next year. As a reminder, VeriSign is not a party in these IRP proceedings but was granted the right to participate in certain limited aspects. Also, as a reminder, an IRP under ICANN's bylaws is for the purpose of ensuring that ICANN followed its own policies and procedures when making decisions.

Our expectation is that following the resolution of the IRP, the ICANN Board will make a final decision on the delegation of the .Web TLD. And now we'll open the call for your questions. Operator, we're ready for the first question.

(Operator Instructions) We'll take our first question from Rob Oliver with Baird.

Great. Jim, just to start with you. Just overall, I'd love to get your thought on the domain environment, clearly coming out of COVID, a lot of concerns about small business, small business failure. And you guys have consistently from that time when you took down the guide on domain growth have kind of ratcheted back up and came in at 4 this quarter, pretty impressive. So I just was wondering if you could maybe step back and talk a little bit about what you're seeing in the environment, a lot of new business starts and it would seem that, that would be offsetting some of the kind of macro concerns that they may be weighing on small businesses or maybe they're holding on to their websites? I would love to hear your thoughts there. And then I had a quick follow-up.

Okay. Thanks for the question. Well, I'll make a comment or two, and then I'll invite George and Todd to comment as they see that market having developed over the crisis. I'll just say that, as I mentioned in my remarks, obviously, people are making greater use of the Internet for a wide variety of reasons for their livelihood or in the pursuit of a livelihood and starting new businesses. Others may not be faring as well. There are a lot of complex reasons that people register, keep and delete domain names, and there's a complex sort of analysis that leads to where the increased growth resulted in the quarter.

Overall, the numbers speak for themselves in that it was a solid quarter of additional growth. There's clearly additional Internet usage. There's clearly additional growth in the domain name space as a result of that. And it's quite clear as you see in our results and as you observed. And George and Todd, I'll invite you to comment, if you like.

Sure. This is George Kilguss. So as Jim mentioned, we had a good quarter. New registrations were $10.9 million, which was up about 980,000 new names from a year ago, but very similar to last quarter. And the trends that we're seeing here in Q3 are very similar to last quarter in that we saw strength in registrations from North American registrars, EMEA registrars and APAC registrars.

New units from China-based registrars during the quarter were similar to Q2 level. However, they were down year-over-year. But overall, a very solid quarter, continuing to see good demand here in the third quarter. And I think, as Jim said, those are just secular trends that we're seeing with people, seeing the value and the utility of having a website and getting a domain name to better service their customers and maximize their e-commerce objectives. And I think we're helping to support that, those small businesses in doing that. And those trends, at least so far this year have been good for us.

Great. That's helpful. And my follow-up, George, is for you. I think you mentioned in your prepared remarks, a common relative to Q4 in sales and marketing expenses. And just wanted to just ask on that. Anything out of the ordinary relative to kind of standard practice on investing in your channel around .com growth? And any color you can add there would be great.

Yes, Rob, I would say nothing out of the ordinary. I think if you look in the past couple of years, we have tended to spend a little bit more in the sales and marketing area in the fourth quarter just based on the timing of events. This year, we had some activities that we're going to do early in the year, but with the pandemic in full swing, we kind of pivoted on some of those efforts, and we've repositioned them here in the fourth quarter. So I don't think there's anything unusual there, just the normal management of our marketing activities throughout the year.

I'll take our next question from Nick Jones with Citigroup.

Great. I guess, to the first one, I guess, a little bit more on .web. Can you expand on the decision that's, I guess, coming either later this year or early next year, I guess, in terms of is this kind of a definitive decision that puts this matter to rest? Or is it more of a decision to potentially extend the matter longer? Just any, I guess, color on how to think about the timing of what we're waiting to hear.

Well, we're waiting to hear the final resolution of this IRP. And just as a reminder, this IRP, this form of arbitration, is used in the ICANN community actually involves 2 parties primarily. That's Afilias who's essentially the plaintiff here and ICANN who is the defendant. And as I mentioned in the question that I asked and answered, this is about whether ICANN follows its own policies of procedures when it makes decisions. So that is what the panel will decide. And our expectation, as I said, is that following that resolution, the ICANN board then -- the matter will be returned to ICANN for its process, which is to make a final decision on the delegation of the .web TLD. So that's the expectation. As in any litigation, it's really not proper to speculate on those outcomes, obviously, when something is pending. But we do know in the process, what's pending here, which is a decision by the panel. And they have the final hearing what's scheduled and it was held. And of course, as a participant, but not a litigant, so to speak, we were there at the table. So we're waiting. Hopefully, by the end of this year or early next year. We will hear from the panel. They will answer the allegations by the plaintiff, Affilias, against ICANN and then the matter should be handed to the ICANN Board for resolution on the .web issue. That's our expectation. And that's what we hope to see, and then we'll certainly share with you what we know, when we know it beyond that.

Great. And then a follow-up. Just 1 follow-up on, I guess, just .com market share. So there's some third-party data out there that kind of indicates .com is regaining share despite they're kind of being more I guess, new TLDs. Why do you think that is? Is that what you're seeing? Can you speak to kind of any trends you're seeing there maybe making .com more popular versus new TLDs? I guess just any thoughts or color around that would be great.

Well, I'll just say this I mean, I don't know what data you're referring to, so I can't really address that specifically. I can tell you, though, that the market does not consist only of.com and then new gTLDs or alternate TLDS, there's a large and thriving market of country code TLDs like .cn for China, .de for Germany. Many of those have been commercialized like .co from Colombia. .co is a commercialized TLD that many, many organizations and individuals have chosen to brand themselves on. And there are a large number of those. So the market is far broader than that.

COM is a good brand, and its performance is strong. And registrants like the .com brand because it helps them get found. But beyond that, without seeing what you're referring to, I really can't comment on it. I would just caution that very often, when I've seen people talk about the market, they haven't really considered how large that market is. I would also refer you to our domain name brief. I think there's a good survey of all of the TLDs there.

And I think if you look at that, you might get a slightly different picture. So I hope that's helpful.

We'll now take our last question from Sterling Auty with JPMorgan.

So going back to the domain name growth. In the context of the guidance that you've given for the full year, it would seem to indicate a slowdown in the year-over-year new registrations embedded in that. So I guess my question is, do you think that there was some onetime benefits from COVID that you're not factoring into the guidance for the fourth quarter? Or what else is kind of influenced -- influencing how you kind of guided here for full and how you kind of, guided here for a full year.

Sterling, this is George. Yes. So as you know, Sterling, there are just simply less selling days, as I would put it, in the fourth quarter. Typically, we see the fourth quarter new registrations dip seasonally. So we're keeping an eye on that. Also, I think there's still some uncertainty with regard to COVID and how that disease may pick up here globally. And so some of that caution is also in the guidance that we're providing.

Understood. And I know that .com is a thin registry. But based on your interactions with registrars and industry participants, any sense as to what percentage of domains that are coming on board have e-commerce attached to them at this point? Or any other type of granular breakdown you might have?

Yes. As you mentioned, Sterling, as a thin registry, we don't quite have that detail. We do hear from the registrars that they are seeing more small businesses stand up websites and grow that portion of their business, which I think is good for our business. But as far as the granular detail, I don't have that for you, I'm sorry.

And that kind of brings. I don't know if you guys have seen it, but the Census Bureau has a number of business applications. And it looks like there was a significant spike in late summer coming into the fall. And based on that comment, I'm wondering if you're seeing some of those come in? Or is there the potential that there might be a delayed tailwind from maybe new business formation?

Well, speaking for myself, I haven't seen that data. I don't know that we've correlated any data like that to domain name registrations in our .com and .net zone. I think registrars are probably the first place that there would be some indication of that. I think clearly, we have some indication from them that new business starts are on the up and that there are increased domain name registrations in the U.S. associated with that. So I think in general, the answer to your question is yes, that there's nothing I can think of in the data that would disagree with what you're saying. But any detail or correlation, I don't think we have any.

Got it. And one housekeeping, George, what's the number of names up for renewal in Q4?

In Q4, 34.8 million.

All right. Great. And very last one. You commented a little bit, so I wanted to just put a fine point. Given bringing down the high end of the operating margin for the full year, what would you say the incremental spend that you're now factoring into that guidance is going to that maybe wasn't there before? Or is that the wrong way to look at it?

Well, I think I mentioned it in my prepared remarks. The increased expense year-over-year is really going to increased headcount. We've added about 34 or 36 heads since -- 36 heads since the beginning of the year. And a lot of those additional headcounts are people that we have focused on are cybersecurity and, I would say, software, network engineering functions. And those show up in our R&D and our G&A functions. And so at the end of the quarter, our headcount was about 908 employees, so that was up from 872 at the end of the year.

So I mean the only other thing I'll say is, look, we've -- we came out of 2018 with a similar level of headcount. We had about 900 people. We've been as high as 1,000 employees in the business.

If you step back and look at the prior years, we've been in a GAAP operating expense range of around $110 million, $112 million a quarter, clearly in 2020 here. In 2019 as we got out of -- we sold the VSS security business. We had some moving pieces as we were reorganizing the company. But -- and right now, we're at about $111 million for the quarter of GAAP operating expense here.

So we've been in this range for a long period of time. And we're, as we always are, we're managing the expenses of the business to meet the needs of the business. And I think we've been doing that reasonably well over the past the 7 or 8 years, and we're going to continue to do that.

But the -- to answer your question, it's really been this additional headcount that we've added in our security and stability initiative.

Understood.

And Sterling, this is Jim. Sterling, I would just add too, that there's always a baseline of funding that we make available and increase just simply because a huge aspect of what we do is cybersecurity, which is very difficult to predict, the threat environment is constantly evolving. It's generally always intensifying and increasing and so there are constant investments we make in training, education, new hires, people, technology, hardening our infrastructure, improving its resiliency that are ongoing. In addition, there are responses that we have to make to new threats that are anticipated. These just are routine and happen all the time, but the precise nature, the precise response, and therefore, the price -- the precise budgetary aspect of the response is difficult to predict. What you're seeing is our best estimates based on a long history of experience of doing these kinds of things.

In addition, we fund research and that research evolves. And we recently identified, for example, a huge number of queries that were out coming into the root servers, a massive spike in queries that were literally the result of unintentional activities with that browser behavior that we were able to actually highlight, point out, and help rectify and eliminate a huge amount of volume that was hitting the -- all 13 of the root servers.

There's quite a bit of this research that we do and published. We've done work in name collisions. We do a lot of root instrumentation that helps manage and improve performance and security across the net, we identified the names that are the source of botnets and other sorts of cyber attacks. We share those with different companies, government agencies. So the teams that are working on that are always evolving, growing, training, hiring additional folks. That's our primary mission.

We address it in many broad ways, but it's our top priority. So it shouldn't be a surprise that at times, you're going to see increased spending on it. It's just the nature of the business that we're in. And that's our expertise, and that's our mission.

And that concludes our question-and-answer session. I would now like to turn the conference back over to Mr. Atchley for any additional or closing remarks.

Thank you, operator. Please call the Investor Relations department with any follow-up questions from this call. Thank you for your participation. This concludes our call.

Have a good evening.

Thank you. And that does conclude today's conference. Thank you all for your participation. You may now disconnect.