Terex Corp (TEX) 2013 Q3 法說會逐字稿

Good morning. My name is Tiffany and I will be your conference operator today. At this time I would like to welcome everyone to the Terex Corporation third quarter 2013 financial results conference call. All lines have been placed on mute to prevent any background noise. After the speakers' remarks there will be a question and answer session. (Operator Instructions).

I would now like to turn the conference over to Ronald DeFeo, Chairman and CEO of Terex Corporation. Please go ahead, sir.

Thank you, Tiffany, and good morning, ladies and gentlemen. We appreciate your interest in Terex today. On the call with me is Kevin Bradley, our Senior VP and Chief Financial Officer, as well as Kevin O'Reilly, Vice President of Operational Finance, and Tom Gelston, Vice President of Investor Relations. And several of the leadership team members, including our business segment presidents, are also available on the call this morning for your -- for the Q&A period.

As usual, we will have a replay that will be archived on the Terex website, www.terex.com, under the audio archives in the Investor Relations section.

I will begin with overall commentary and highlights. Kevin will follow with a more detailed financial report, and then I will give you some comments and summarize before we open it up to your questions. We will be following the presentation that accompanied the earnings release and is available on our website. I would like to request that you ask one question and a follow-up in order to give everyone a chance to participate.

Let me direct your attention to page two, which is the forward-looking statements and non-GAAP measures explanation. We encourage you to read this as well as other items in our disclosures, because the information we will be discussing today does include forward-looking material.

So now let me begin, turning to page three. Third quarter results were generally in line with our expectations. While the sales and order environment remains on the softer side, we did see improved net income versus the prior year, driven mainly by lower interest expense and a lower effective tax rate.

We achieved an earnings per share of $0.77 in the quarter versus an adjusted result of $0.62 per share for the same quarter in 2012. Our segment results were mixed in the quarter. Aerial Work Platforms had a strong quarter, delivering both excellent growth -- up 22% versus the prior year -- as well as solid operating margins of 15%.

Construction continues to be challenged, and we continue to trim noncore businesses from this segment as well as simplify our cost structure overall. The Cranes business continues to see a mix of business conditions globally.

The Material Handling & Port Solutions business returned to a profit on slightly higher sales than a year ago. Improved performance by the Port business as well as the parts and service portion of the Material Handling business led to the operating profit in the quarter versus the losses posted in the three prior quarters.

Materials Processing executed their operating plan about as expected, and we are pleased with the profit contribution, especially in light of the end market uncertainty.

Clearly there are some near-term challenges in many markets. As such, we continue to focus on those aspects, as we have said previously, of our business that we can control. We will continue our efforts associated with the restructuring and streamlining of many of our segments.

Lastly, free cash flow of $87 million in the quarter brings our nine month free cash flow total to $262 million. We continue to expect free cash flow to be in excess of $400 million as previously communicated.

I will return in a couple of minutes to provide some segment highlights, but first I would like to turn it over to Kevin who will go through financial results for the quarter. Kevin?

Thanks, Ron, andgood morning, everyone. Turning to slide four, I will review the financial results for quarter.

Our net sales for the quarter of $1.8 billion was essentially flat when compared with the prior year quarter. Our AWP business led the segments with growth of 22% versus the prior year with Cranes and Construction offsetting that with decreased sales of 12% and 17% respectively. MH&PS was up slightly at 3.5% growth, and Material Processing was relatively flat, down 1.5%.

Gross margin increased 40 basis points to 21.4% from the as adjusted prior year quarter. Favorable mix in business, including significant growth in AWP, contributed to the increase.

SG&A remained relatively consistent with the as adjusted prior year quarter. Engineering spending increased as we continue to invest in new products and tier four engine compliance. This increase was substantially offset by previous cost reduction activities, primarily in Construction and Material Processing.

Operating margins increased slightly to 7.8% of sales for the quarter. Net interest and other expense was down substantially, roughly $13.4 million when compared with the prior year quarter as adjusted. The improvement in this line item was driven by debt reduction and refinancing actions executed in 2012 and in the second and third quarter of this year, which accounted for substantially all of the improvement.

The third quarter effective tax rate was 19%. This compares to an as adjusted tax rate of 28.6% in the prior year quarter. The lower tax rate was mainly driven by a release of uncertain tax provisions, partially offset by a reduction in the UKincome tax rate for 2013. For the full year we are now forecasting an adjusted effective tax rate of approximately 33%.

For Q3, earnings per share was $0.77. This compares to $0.62 as adjusted and $0.27 as reported EPS in the prior year quarter.

Networking capital as a percentage of annualized sales was 26%, a slight decrease from the 26.6% reported in Q3 of 2012. We continue to target an end of year result of 22%.

And finally, return on invested capital decreased to 6% from 7.7% in the prior year. The current ROIC reflects the impacts of restructuring actions taken earlier in the year, where a significant amount of the benefit of these actions will not be realized until 2014.

With that, let me turn it back to Ron.

Thank you, Kevin, andlet me provide some detailed commentary following the presentation beginning on page five.

Our Aerial Work Platform business continues to benefit from the recovery in the North American rental channel, a strong Latin American market, as well as early signs of a beginning European replacement cycle. We continue to be optimistic about the prospects of this business, as demand seems healthy, our expanded product range is being well received, and our margins appear sustainable. Backlog up 35% versus prior year is giving us an early read that 2014 will likely see continued growth in this business.

Turning to page six, our Construction segment. The business continues to see the same operating environment for its mix of products; namely reduced demand for our scrap handling equipment; lower off-highway truck sales, mostly as a result of a scale-back in China by our partners; and continued spotty demand for our compact equipment business. We continue to look at additional steps to further reduce the complexity and cost structure in this segment.

Turning to page seven for our Crane segment. The global crane market remains soft, as we have previously communicated. Softness in Australia in particular and a few other select products and markets more than offset any growth achieved elsewhere as well as impacted our margin mix negatively in the current reporting period. The Middle East remains the leader in growth in our cranes, and we anticipate this continuing.

As noted on page eight, the Material Handling & Port Solutions segment had a fairly positive quarter, especially following the tough first half of 2013. Overall sales were a slight improvement versus the prior year, up 4%. Industrial cranes were down actually versus Q3 2012, although the parts and services portion of this business performed as expected.

Conversely our Port Solutions business was up quite nicely. The Material Handling side of the business is expected to remain soft for a while, driven by global weakness from industrial capital expenditures.

On the Port solutions side we are seeing the anticipated reversal in the negative sales trends that we had in the first half of 2013, and the backlog supports the growth assumption in the fourth quarter and meaningful growth in 2014. The improved backlog, which is up 34% versus the prior year, combined with substantial restructuring efforts that are underway and mostly impacting 2014, make us optimistic about the ongoing contribution from this group.

Lastly, on page nine, our Materials Processing segment, while essentially flat on the top line, delivered substantially better operating margins at 12.8% versus 10.1% on a year-over-year basis. From the demand side, mineral driven markets globally such as Australia and South America combined with a sluggish European construction market to continue to pressure this business from a revenue perspective.

That has been a bit offset by some growth we have seen in North America. As we stated previously, this business is one of our better businesses in reacting to the fluctuations in end market demands, and the business is actively managing its cost structure to mitigate whatever end market risk exists.

So turning to the last page, in summary we have choppy markets. But our execution in these markets we feel is improving. The whole Company is focused on execution and doing the things that we can control.

Our earnings per share in the third quarter of $0.77 was achieved mainly through a lower tax rate and $11 million of lower interest expense versus the prior year. We believe we have turned the corner our Material Handling & Port Solutions business, but overall Aerial Work Platforms is the only business where global demand drivers remain quite predictable. Importantly the architectural billing index supports a future recovery in nonresidential construction.

For the full year of 2013 we continue to expect to generate over $400 million of free cash flow, and we have increased our EPS guidance to between $2.05 to $2.25 a share as a result of the lower anticipated 2013 effective tax rate. Although now we have modified -- moderately lowered our revenue guidance to $7.3 billion to $7.5 billion.

So with that I would like to now open it up for questions, operator. And thank you, and we will take the first question.

(Operator Instructions). Your first question comes from the line of Ann Duignan ofJPMorgan.

Good morning, everyone.

Good morning, Ann.

Ron, could you talk a little bit about decline in the backlog in the Cranes business and how that sets you up for 2014, particularly in the context that we have got CONEXPO in March. Are people going to be holding back now until after that event, and we are looking at kind of a back half 2014 before we see Cranes really improve?

Okay, Ann, I will initially comment, and then turn it over to Tim, who is a lot more familiar with the specifics than I am.

As we started this year we were expecting that the Cranes business would have a more positive year. We expected some to come from new products and some to come from market growth. Really mark growth didn't materialize, and it actually was worse than we expected.

Australia for us has been historically a very strong market with good product, and Australia has -- is down in the range of 50% almost in all of our business as a company and in our Cranes business it is kind of most pronounced. So it kind of took some of the opportunity in our Cranes business off temporarily.

Having said that, I'm really pretty positive about what is happening in our Cranes segment, because I think we remain focused on a good execution and preparing for what will be better times. And I will let Tim handle the specifics about CONEXPO, current backlog and that kind of thing. So Tim?

All right, Ron, thanks. And, Ann, your question is very apropos. We spent a lot of time on order intake, as you might imagine.

I think -- as I look at the business today I feel like we are at a turning point. I don't want to say that the 2014 outlook is incredibly robust compared to where we are today, but it is certainly getting better than it has been in the last six to eight months. Our order intake in the third quarter I think was a little bit muted for several reasons.

One, we did not get any stock orders from our dealers when we might typically get some at this time of year. Second, our overall organization is going through a pretty substantial change in terms of a new alignment, and I think to be perfectly honest we may have lost a little focus in the third quarter. But as I sit here today and as we look at the early part of October, October is actually shaping up to be our best order intake month of year.

So I feel pretty good about where we are. I think the rest of 2013 will see continued strength, and I'm positive as we look ahead to 2014.

What I don't know today is whether or not many of our dealers will hold back on order placement, or whether or not they will get in front of CONEXPO. That is unclear to me today, and we will be working that over the next few months with our North American and European customers.

Okay. I appreciate the color, and I appreciate the outlook ahead of CONEXPO. Then a follow-up question, Ron. You have an activist investor who has taken 2% ownership in Terex. Have you had any conversations? I mean, I know it is touchy to ask specifically about activists, but have you had any conversations with any of your larger shareholders? And any color you could give us on that would be great.

Usually, Ann, we don't have obviously communication with our major shareholders in the first couple of weeks leading up to an earnings release. But we have had no contact with the activist shareholder that you mentioned.

And our view is that we are open to any and all conversations with shareholders and actively reach out to those shareholders and encourage them to visit our facilities and encourage them to give us their points of view. We are interested in their points of view. We want to run Terex as if we were the most active activist ourselves.

So we are open. Your specific reference, there has been no contact with I think the one you are referencing.

Okay, Ron. Thanks, I appreciate that. I will get back in line and hand it over. Thanks.

Your next question comes from the line of Nicole DeBlase with Morgan Stanley.

So in Material Handling & Port Solutions I think one of the highlights of the quarter for me was the 4% margin performance. Can you just comment on what that means for 4Q from a seasonal perspective? I know 3Q is typically a seasonally strong quarter for MHPS margins. And then what that means -- doesthat mean that 2% to 3% is achievable as we move into 2014?

Nicole, thank you for the question. I will turn it over to Steve in a second.

I was encouraged by the Q3 performance in Material Handling & Port Solutions. I must say I expected it, but I was glad that we achieved it. And I think it is on the basic plan that we have kind of laid out for this business over the next several years.

Typically speaking, the fourth quarter of the calendar year is one of a slower quarters for this business, but I do think we have some unusual things happening in that our Port business continues to strengthen. I am optimistic that we are on the longer term trend to achieve the 2015 margin goals of 7.5%, as we have kind of laid out.

And so I will let Steve comment from there. Steve?

Yes, thanks, Ron. Thanks, Nicole. For sure I would say that in Q4 we are going to make money, so we want to continue the trend. It is a slower quarter for us in the Material Handling business, but I think we have got a few orders that we need to get out in December, which could be good news.

As Ron mentioned on the Port side, we have got deliveries of the large projects, which have started in Q3. We have started to deliver a part of those. We will continue to deliver some of those in Q4 and then obviously into 2014 on the large projects.

The other side of the business, what I call kind of the conventional port business -- the rubber tired cranes, the straddle carriers, the reach stackers -- at the beginning of the year was pretty slow, and we have gotten orders really in the summer time that have helped us pick up deliveries in Q3 and Q4. So I feel better about the conventional port business, so to speak.

So I think that Q4 for us is going to be another good quarter. Probably not as good as Q3. As you mentioned that is a big quarter for MH, more on the service side. But for 2014 I think we are pretty excited about the opportunities that are there in 2014.

Okay. Got it. That is really helpful, thanks. And one more, if I may. I notice that you guys didn't include the slide on updated segment guidance for the full year. I don't know if that is just a function of where we are in the year. But I know it's a broad question, but maybe you just toucha bit on where you expect to be relative to your last full year guidance by segment, and I guess where the revenue reduction came by segment.

Nicole, this is Ron. I think it is just a function of where we are in the year. That level of precision in terms of segment by segment guidance is really not what we want to do by quarter. I think what we try to frame going into the year is where we think each and every one of the segments is going to be.

I think if I would have to make a general statement I would say AWP continues to have opportunity, we continue to be positive. Although it is always the weakest quarter of AWP typically, the fourth quarter.

On the other hand, I think our Cranes business has been weak all year, and what we are really working on is building the order bank for 2014 for this business. But we also feel we will have a solid quarter in fourth quarter, okay?

And as I look at Construction, I think construction is pretty much bottomed out and is in a pretty good place. I mean not good from an overall performance point of view, but good from probably not a lot more deterioration from here.

End markets still relatively weak globally, in particular the Chinese portion of our truck business has caused us to suffer. But they have given us some indications that 2014 will actually be better than 2013. Sothat is not a bad situation.

Material Processing, that is a business that is unlikely to see a lot of revenue uptick, but I think the overall execution there is pretty darn good. The dealer inventory, we know what that is. It is in good shape.

It is not like our dealers are loaded with inventory. We think they will want to buy some product before the end of the year. And lastly, Material Handling & Port Solutions business I think you just heard Steve comment on.

Overall, I know our fourth quarter revenue expectations are higher than the year ago period, ifyou just take our $7.3 billionto $7.5 billion of guidance. And it does concern us a little bit just looking on a year-over-year basis, but at the same time we are pretty positive about our margin opportunity. So that is how I would kind of shape it out.

Okay, thanks, guys. I will turn it over.

Your next question comes from the line of Jerry Revich of Goldman Sachs.

Steve Filipov, I'm wondering if you could talk about -- now that you have had the segment on MHPS for the past I believe nine months, can you just give us an update on the restructuring program, and where exactly you stand organizationally and just step us through the changes that have been implemented thus far, and what we are looking for over the next six to 12 months?

Of course, Jerry. So where we are in the restructuring -- I think we are on plan for all of it. Where we are is, as you know, earlier in year we started a restructuring on SG&A, and we are on plan with that and have probably exited close to 300 team members.

In Q2, as you know, we took a $47 million charge for restructuring, and within that restructuring there was an additional add of about 200 team members in Germany. We are in the process of negotiating that with the works council.

If you would have asked me the question about three or four weeks ago, I felt like we were kind of behind the curve on really getting an agreement with the works council and making progress on the 200 team members in Germany. Today I think things are progressing well. We have another meeting with the works council next week, and I feel positive like that is going to happen.

So I think we are on plan. I would say the savings for Q3 so far that have hit because of those restructuring programs is about $4 million, and Q4 we will probably have another $4 million. And then the bulk of I think in 2014 we will see the savings from Germany really flow through the P&L. So Germany we need to get done.

Some of that is going to hit -- some of the savings is going to hit in Q2, but probably most of it really into 2014. So feel good about the restructuring, feel good about the environment and the relationship now with the works council. So we have made good progress on the SG&A side and also on kind of the German workforce side.

And then, Ron, across your businesses in Europe, can you just talk about how you feel about the 12 to 24 month outlook? Clearly seeing positive signs in freight volumes and industrial demand, but it looks like construction pending is still soft. Wondering how you think about where we are in the cycle? When do you think we will see demand for your products really picking up?

The good news about Terex is that we have a pretty diversified revenue base. And over years we have tried to build it and diversify it by product and by geography. So on one hand Europe is a critical market to us, because historically it has representedas much as 40% of our total business.

Today that is a little bit less. And in general Europe has been a bit of a drag for us overall. And as I look at 2014, I guess I would say most of the negative trends actually are -- seem to be more or less behind us. If I look forward based on where we are right now I think we are begin -- we've turned a corner on Aerial Work Platforms beginning to grow.

Our Cranes business at least is no longer declining in our European business. Our Materials Processing business is beginning to see some growth, and overall at Terex I would say our European business is fairly flat year-over-year.

And so my personal view is that 2014 -- excuse me -- will see a return to growth in Europe for the overall Company. I wouldn't expect it to be double digit growth, but I would expect it to be mid single digit type growth. And that will be quite encouraging for us.

Conversely, the US business, which I think is -- has been pretty good for our Aerials business and showing some signs for our Cranes business. Our Material Handling & Port Solutions business has been pretty positive. But our Cranes business actually had a negative Q3 over 2013 compared to 2012.

But I don't see that continuing into 2014. I see the US returning to some amount of growth. So -- and those are the big markets.

The commodities pressure that we experienced this past year from Australia, I think that commodity pressure is still there, but I don't see the downdraft that we had this year. So the net-net of all that is markets we think will be moderately better for the Company in 2014 than in 2013, but again most of what we have to do are things that we can control.

Thank you very much.

Your next question comes from the line of Jamie Cook of Credit Suisse.

Good morning. A nice quarter. Two questions. First, Tim, just back to the comments you made with regards to Ann's question. Can you talk -- you talked about I think October is setting up to be one of the best order months. Can you talk about where that strength is coming from and why dealers didn't take stock in the third quarter?

And I guess just assuming -- Cranes just had a lot of false starts. Assuming that Cranes don't get better next year, and we are sitting here in this flat environment, is there an opportunity for you to grow your margins next year base on some internal initiatives?

And then, Ron, my second question is to you, just more strategically, one, an update on the Construction business and possibly divesting some of the unprofitable businesses? And then as you sit here today how do you think about your 2015 targets? Thanks.

Jamie, thank you. A lot in that question. I will try and see if I can address that.

With respect to orders for Cranes, the think that is encouraging to me is that while we are not in a position of robust growth, there is more I think selective buying that is happening as opposed to selective shopping that was happening earlier in the year. As I have said on this call previously and in other forums as well, we have a regular call with our global sales leaders. And one of the things that we look at is where is the order quotation activity happening.

About half of our quotes that are out there today are for delivery in the first half of next year. And our quote activity has been fairly strong over the past several weeks. And the quote activity is coming from places that you would hope you would begin to see some growth, Europe, even North America we are seeing a number of quotes for very large machines on projects that are out there.

We are going to have to flush through a little bit of channel inventory in North America, but when you get past four to six weeks period of excess inventory out there in the channel, 2013 and the first half of 2014 begins to shape up very well. As Ron noted, biggest drag for us this year has been a decline in our Australian business. It is a very profitable business for us, and that drag has been substantial on our margin performance.

So when I kind of sum it all up I'm actually increasingly optimistic about the rest of this year and going into next year.

So now let me deal with your strategic question, Jamie. I'm going to start with that first, because as you probably expect you can never answer a divestiture question.

[When] we set our 2015 targets, weexpected 2013 to be the first year of multiple year growth. And frankly, that is the one big disappointment that we have had this year, and we generally are going to have a year of 2013 with very little if only moderate revenue growth compared to the prior year. But the positive side of what we have said is that we are actually delivering on our operating margins more or less as we said.

And if you recall, what I said about 2015 was that about two-thirds of the opportunity to achieve that goal was within our control and about a third had to come from the market. And I still feel that way, but with little or no revenue growth obviously the hill is a little bit steeper to climb. But that doesn't mean we don't all in this company believe we can still climb that hill.

Obviously I'm going to talk specifically in January or early February about 2014, but in general we think the fundamentals in our business to achieve approximately the kind of revenue and the kind of operating margin that is implied in the outlook or goals I set up rather for 2015 we still feel is there. So business by business, AWP is on track.

I think Material Handling & Port Solutions is turning the corner to get on track and pretty positive they will get on track. I think Materials Processing is behind a little bit from a revenue point of view but on track from a margin perspective. Construction is a mixed bag.

I think we have worked really hard this year to get real sustained structural cost out of that business, and I think 2014 is shaping up to be a much improved year in each and every one of the operations without a lot of revenue increase. Which leaves us with Cranes. And there is no doubt that the crane business is a highly cyclical business, and there is no doubt that we are at the top of the cycle.

So 2014 is probably a lot harder to handicap than 2015 which is going to be a stronger year. It's just a matter of is it 10% stronger or 30% stronger? And that is what we are going to need to try to figure out at this stage.

So I hope I answered your question. I know it has been a general answer, but I don't think you could expect me to be more specific than that.

Okay, thanks, I will get back in queue.

The next question from the line of Eli Lustgarten of Longbow.

Good morning, everyone. How are you?

Good morning, Eli, how are you?

Okay. A couple quick questions. One, pricing. I mean, one of the disappointments we had from Caterpillar yesterday was price competition, especially in Europe, [well over] in Construction, what have you. Can you talk about pricing that you are seeing across the markets, particularly in some of the new orders? And you talked about the strengthening of orders, whether pricing is a factor in any of these things?

Okay. I'm going to give you an overview comment and go through a couple of segments, and then open it up to a couple of key businesses so they can comment more specifically.

One of the things I tried to do at Terex is to get us into specialty businesses where the competitive environment was clear, the competitors were specific, and where pricing could be understood. Maybe not completely have confidence in it, but you take our key businesses. In our Cranes business, if you set aside the Chinese competition, which really is not invading the developed world, we have got a couple of very big successful competitors who have a price history. We know how they act, we can understand them, I think they understand us.

Aerial Work Platforms, not a whole lot different. Material Handling & Port Solutions, not a lot different, whether you are in the overhead crane business or in the port business, save perhaps one big Chinese player in the port business. And so in general we have tried to create a Terex where we are a specialty manufacturer where there can be some price discipline.

Now obviously in our Construction business we are in a cross section of product categories, and they can be a little bit more price competitive, and we have consolidated customers who do put price pressure on us periodically. So I just wanted to kind of give you that overview, Eli, because I think it is important to understand Terex a little bit from that point of view.

But let me turn it over to Matt, who can comment on pricing in particular in the AWP business, and then maybe Tim in the Cranes area.

Sure. Good morning, Eli. From a pricing standpoint it is one of the pieces for our -- in our goals to keep our margins expanding. And I would say in AWP the environment remains rationale.

We just came out with a 2014 price increase, 2% on average. What we are seeing is that most of the major competitors have also announced increases for 2014. The other big piece of pricing in the AWP industry is going to be around the tier four increases. They are completely independent of the 2% average that I talk about.

And so starting -- we started that transition in tier four in the middle of this year, so weare seeing that people are accepting. They are not happy about the tier four price increases -- people are never happy about any price increases -- we are seeing that the major competitors are raising prices and people are accepting them. And so there is pretty good discipline in the AWP segment.

Eli, let me make a comment mere on the Cranes pricing. Though as a Cards fan I know you had a tough night last night, but the good thing [about baseball] --

Don't remind me.

-- is there is always today, right?

Always manana, yes.

Overall I would say in the Cranes business we are actually pleased with price performance. On a year-to-date basis our price performance is actually positive, which is a good thing for us. We've maintained a great deal of discipline internally, and frankly, the market has actually responded similarly.

I hear very rarely today about deep discounting happening from our competitors. It is not common today, where it was maybe six to 12 months ago, to hear about deals going on out there that might have been deeply discounted. So I'm actually relatively pleased with the discipline that the market is showing.

I would say looking forward I think we will see some discounting, thoughI don't expect a bloodbath in the marketplace. There is some excess inventory in the channel, particularly in North America, as I mentioned earlier. Typically you would want to see two to two and a half, three months worth of inventory, and we probably have between two and a half and four months of inventory.

So there will be a little bit of discounting to get the equipment out the door. I don't expect it to be extraordinary, and overall I'm relatively pleased with how we are performing.

Okay. Can I have one follow-up question? Last month there was a big AWP order are that was canceled, I believe by United Rentals or so, and the reason given actually was extended [lead] times that you are hearing. So, I mean, [you talk] about the order patterns in AWP going there, and was that big order canceled -- resolved, and was it lead times that actually caused it?

Let me kind of take that and pass it over to Matt.

I think United Rentals is doing the industry a service in being disciplined themselves and only taking on the fleet they can take in and manage and making sure that their branches execute on their rental rate strategy. And I think they want their branches to have rate discipline, and I don't think they want accelerated growth. And I really want to compliment United Rentals for that. I think if they execute against that plan, that will help everybody.

I think that resulted in some order cancellations for ourselves and probably some substantially greater order cancellations for others. But Matt has probably more particulars than me.

I think Ron has got the situation right. In specific. your question about was it related to lead times. I would say only on a few product categories. Telehandlers, the lead times have been out there.

And I think that what United looks at is do they really want to be loading up with equipment late in Q3 and into Q4? Most rental companies try to get their fleet in hand late Q1 through Q2, so they would back off. In general lead times across the product lines are good right now.

All right. Thank you very much.

Your next question comes from the line of Rob Wertheimer of Vertical Research Partners.

On Cranes, can you mention the normal portion of the mix that goes to dealer stock? I'm not sure I know that number, and you mentioned it was a little soft in the quarter.

Thanks, Rob. This is Tim. Overall, our dealer stock number is a meaningful percentage of our sales, but it is not a -- it is not a dramatic number. So I don't have an absolute number for you, but I would say 20% of our total year purchases would typically come from dealer stock, something in that order of magnitude.

Keep in mind however, that the way we have got the segment organized we have utilities and our services business in here as well. So I'm not talking about 20% of the overall segment. And Cranes products makes up probably about 70% of our overall segment.

That was helpful. Thank you. And then just in general I think you expected sort of a margin -- or at least the last segment quarter guide implied it into the back half. I know things wobble, but you didn't get the margin sequential improvement. Was the surprise in Australia most of it, or was there some other driver there?

Definitely Australia had the biggest impact, but we had a couple of other one-time unusual items. We had a warranty charge in the utility business that was for some equipment that we produced between the years 2000 and 2007. And we had an asset impairment charge that we took as well in the quarter, along with a little bit of higher engineering expense for some of the tier four changeover work and some additional SG&A from a corporate cost standpoint. But overall I think the Australian impact was the most significant.

Thank you. If I can sneak in one more, Ron or anybody, I guess. The government shutdown had maybe less of an impact than many have feared, but we did hear Cat mention the other day that smaller contractors are affected by the confidence in the economy and the political situation. Are you seeing that at all, and maybe especially in smaller AWP customers who you would like to see come through to support the cycle in the next couple of years? Thanks, I'll stop.

Seeing any impact from the government shutdown is way beyond my pay grade. I don't think we would ever be able to estimate something like that.

What I would say is the overall attitude of what is the long-term implications for a MAP-21 or a new transportation bill, how are we going to get funding for the Highway Trust Fund, the sequestration will affect the Highway Trust Fund if it doesn't get resolved. I think that overall effect is creating a level of uncertainty out there that is diminishing what should be a bullish recovery into a very moderate recovery, andthat is the kind of operating environment that we are seeing as reality, okay?

So until we see leadership in those areas I mentioned, we are going to kind of expect a moderate US economic environment.

Thank you.

Your next question comes from the line of Schon Williams of BB&T Capital Markets.

Hi, good morning.

Good morning, Schon.

I wonder if you could -- we spent time talking about some of the restructuring savings in Material Handling, but there should be contributions on the Cranes and Construction side. I mean, can you just talk generally about whether -- where we are with those plans?

I will first go to George and then to Tim. George?

Thank you. Thank you, Schon, for the question. On the Construction side we are -- I would say in the last quarter of this year will complete all of the previously announced restructuring activity, and it is obviously going to help us as we go into 2014 to have all of this behind us. So I'm pleased with the activity, as painful as it is, but you will see that as we move forward, completing out this year.

And, Schon, this is Tim. We announced the restructuring activity in Cranes in the second quarter, and as is customary with -- in Germany, we are in the process of negotiating the agreement with the works council. Our expectation is that we will have that completed here in the fourth quarter and begin to realize some of the benefits of that in 2014.

And for reference, the cranes restructuring was $15 million, with an annualized benefit in that neighborhood.

Exactly.

Okay. Perfect. And then just as a follow-up, therehas been some press about maybe some reorganization within one of our Oklahoma facilities on the Construction side. Can you just talk about -- I mean, it sounds like there was a -- there is going to be a substantial CapEx spend there. I think reports were around $30 million. Can you give a little bit of color there, kind of what is going on and what you think you will need to invest in that facility?

Well, Schon, one of the good things about Terex is that we are pretty diverse, and we have a meaningful amount of real estate around the world. And one of the situations that we faced was a declining US road building business, and so our position in that business -- with our position in that business we decided to divest most of products, which left us with a pretty substantial 700,000 square foot facility positioned in the middle of the country with access to supply bases south of us in the Midwest that give us a great opportunity to build products there for our global customer base and in particular our North American customer base.

And so we are retooling that facility. We have got some facilities around the country where we are not sure whether their long-term leases will be renewed, and we haven't announced specifically what we are going to move into this facility. But it will be a facility that will pay back probably in less than two years. So we are really pretty encouraged by what we think we can do there.

Were there some -- there was some tax incentives maybe coming along with that investment?

Any time you make this kind of a move, you always want to ask for help from the local authorities, and we are pretty positive about how the local authorities are dealing with us. And I don't want to front-run any of those conversations, but I think there will clearly be some good help from the local authorities.

All right. Thanks, guys, and congrats on the quarter.

Ladies and gentlemen, in consideration of time we are going to limit questions to only one per person. Your next question comes from the line of Andrew Kaplowitz of Barclays.

Can you hear me okay?

Yes, Andrew.

Ron, so you sound confident in growth in 2014 for AWP. Maybe you or Matt could parse out what kind of growth you see in the different markets you are in, whether it is the national rental companies or the independents in the US and Europe, which you have been positive about this year, what do you expect there, and then in Brazil and China if you could?

Okay, Andy. I will ask Matt to handle that, but I just want to make sure we are not going to give specific percentage increases, but we are also in early conversations with most of our major customers, so we are not dealing from no knowledge here. So, Matt, why don't you comment on that?

Sure. Good morning, Andrew. We are continuing to see a strong market, and one of the most encouraging things is the geographic mix, which is part of your question. The replacement cycle continues in North America, but we are also seeing fleet growth here in North America. And when we shift over to Europe we are seeing the beginning signs of the replacement cycle, and we have had really good growth in Latin America.

And China continues -- it is small when you look at our overall sales, but if you look at year-over-year that is improving, and we are having a good year there. The only place that is stalled is Australia. So when I look at 2014, and I look at the fundamentals -- and what I mean there is looking what is the utilization in the rental companies, what is the fleet ages, what is the profile of their fleet -- we are feeling really good about next year.

We are still in the middle of the planning cycle, and we are in negotiations with the major companies, but we are spending a lot of time with all of the major rental companies around the world. And everybody is feeling basically positive about next year. You referenced the independents, and we just had a group of them together this week, and it is the same story there. They are feeling better than they did last year. So when we look forward, nothing is finalized, but it feels very positive.

Thanks, Matt. And, Tim, maybe I could ask one clarification question on Crane margins, if I could. If you excluded Australia and the warranty issue that you had and the asset impairment, is it fair to say that margins would have been close to last year or at least closer to last year's third quarter?

Yes, definitely. We were significantly impacted by the Australian mix and the one-time items that I mentioned. We would have been much closer year-over-year than we were.

Okay. Thank you.

Your next question comes from the line of Ted Grace of Susquehanna.

Hi, Ted.

Hi, guys. How are you doing?

All right.

So, Ron, you made a comment that at least my interpretation was third quarter orders may have been a little shy of internal expectations and that the near-term remains challenging. And so, just as we look at orders from third quarter and we think about fourth quarter, how would you encourage us to think about fourth quarter, and how do you feel about the setup entering 2014? I know you said you don't want to give percentage guidances, but just some flavor on how you think we should be calibrated for fourth quarter orders, given the kind of shaky environment would be really helpful.

I think what I emphasize is that the environment is a little bit harder to predict than I would like, than any of our team leaders would like. And -- but if you peel that onion back it really comes down to pretty positive outlooks in AWP and Material Handling & Port Solutions, a fairly negative outlook in the short-term on Construction but not getting worse -- in other words, we think we hit the bottom there. And the Cranes is -- we are seeing some -- finally some positive order momentum, but will it be sustainable, and the Materials Processing business, which is one of our smaller segments, but their business has historically been pretty good in Europe, but Europe has been pretty challenged.

So it -- the net-net big swing factor is how does Tim Ford's Crane business do? And so I really can't give you much more specificity than that, but let me just say that I feel very good about our Company's diversity, because many of you were worried about, well, golly, you know, MHPS was a loser and was a strong loser in the first six months -- actually the past nine months. But we really felt that this was going be a good business long-term.

It is not performing at a good business level yet, but fundamentally has all of the characteristics of a good business, and so I feel very positive about the mix of the operations. So how high is high in 2014 will very much depend upon just how we handicap Cranes business in that year.

Okay. And then on the Aerial business, if my recollection is correct, a year ago the third quarter had slippage of a URI order I think in the 4Q so that you had an unusually strong fourth quarter number in Aerials. Just when we think about calibrating our expectations for fourth quarter orders in 2014 how would you encourage us to just kind of like factor that dynamic in if I have got it correct?

You have it correct, but I would always urge caution on forecasting the business off of a backlog number, okay? Matt going to sometimes get an order -- big order in the third quarter, he may get big orders in the fourth quarter. What you really want to look for is what is the overall book to bill ratios, what are the trends, and what is kind of the commentary around the business?

And the commentary around this business is fleet ages, utilization of equipment, valuation of used equipment, architectural billing index. If all of those things are fairly positive toward our business, whether we get a big order in the third quarter or a big order in the fourth quarter, this is a pretty decent oligopoly. So the positive opportunity sits here. So at least that is how I think we should think about AWP.

Okay, that is super helpful. Have a great quarter, and good luck, guys.

Thank you.

Your next question comes from the line of Mig Dobre of Robert W. Baird.

Hello, can you hear me?

Yes, Mig.

Great, thanks. Looking at Construction, performance here, especially on the margin side, a lot better than what I expected. And I guess I'm wondering, especially as we are looking at SG&A expenses ticking quite a bit lower year-over-year, what sort of run rate should we be applying here, especially keeping in mind that you have restructuring activity coming, if I understood you correctly, in the fourth quarter?

I would say, Mig, that the restructuring activity is running through the fourth quarter, and actually we are carrying some of the expenses. We already announced the restructuring activities, but carrying some of the extra expenses in the fourth quarter that will run off as well into next year. Do I have that right, George?

Yes.

Okay. So I think it is hard to give you a specific number on what the SG&A trend going to be in 2014, because we are not exactly ready for that yet. But I would say that this is a business where at this fairly low level we feel we are at break even or damn close to it. And with any kind of a revenue uptick we are going to start beginning to show decent black numbers.

And let me pick apart the three basic businesses. The Material Handling business, which is the Fuchs material handler, it is a scrap steel product. Scrap steel prices have been in the toilet. Consequently our business has been in the toilet. And we are beginning to see the pricing of steel improve and the interest level and activity among our primary distributors and customers showing a more positive trend. We a phenomenally lean facility in Germany that is ready for an efficient order intake -- for an efficient performance with a moderate order intake.

So that is business one. Business two is our compact business, both North America and Europe. The European has undergone the biggest restructuring, and we have simplified the business phenomenally, taken about half of the head count out of it. And the European compact equipment business, though, has been very weak. We have got about six months more of finishing our production planning and assembly process, and we believe we will have a highly efficient operation there.

And then next year, later on in the year we have got some new products that we are working on. So I don't expect, though, 2014 compact equipment in Europe to strongly recover, but I do expect it to improve.

And the last piece that I will emphasize is our Tel truck business or our big dump truck business. That business will be a little harder to handicap, and probably in short-term you know we bump up against a small mining category in our rigid trucks, and as I mentioned earlier we really have suffered because of a China slowdown. So we see China beginning to improve in 2014. That will help that business.

So I don't see a huge bounce-back, but I see an improvement in 2014 over to 2013. So, net-net, I you know I'm cautiously optimistic about all of the hard work we have done here contributing to a decent performance. I'm a little worried that our revenue expectations for 2015 may be a bit high, but we will see how it goes.

Your next question comes from the line of Seth Weber of RBC Capital Markets.

Hi, guys. Good morning.

Good morning.

I guess just first a clarification. Did the -- on the MHPS business, did the service component -- were service revenues up year-over-year in the quarter?

Steve, you want to comment on that?

Seth, year-over-year is slightly down, but sequentially for the past really two quarters up in both parts and service.

Your next question comes from the line of Alex Blanton of Clear Harbor Asset.

Hi, good morning. I have a question on the Aerial Work Platforms, perhaps for Matt. And that is that in the past that industry has been characterized by -- in various regions of the world at various times by a shift from the prior practices of lifting people into the air for work, such as ladders and scaffolding and other kinds of machines like truck-mounted cranes in Europe. And the shift from those practices to aerial work platforms took place first in the US, and it is pretty much finished, but how do you characterize that shift in other regions like Europe, China, South America? Because that is a big source of growth in that business for the future, I think, in those regions.

Go ahead, Matt.

Thanks, Alex, that is a great question, because clearly one of the things that drives -- if you kind of zoom out and look at what drives aerial work platform demand, you are exactly right. When people move from scaffolding or other methods of getting up to do work at heights safely, they find that aerial work platforms are the solution.

What drives that is standards, and each of the developed nations have had standards in place for years, and those standards have evolved. But as you start to look around the world at developing markets, you see that the standards are starting to be implemented in places like Mexico, and you do see a couple of years down the road a significant change in what the market dynamics are.

The most recent one is in China they are starting to implement some standards. So we are still seeing that trend. It takes time. As the markets develop, it takes a while to convert people from scaffolding to aerial work platforms but in the end there is kind of a threshold on height where the efficiency really goes up. And the safety concerns go up once you get way up there. But that being said, the underlying economics of it, they have to have enough money to afford them.

But we think that is a positive trend for us going forward, and it just spells opportunity for AWP over the next few years and even decades.

And I think, Matt, we are very well positioned. We just had -- we have a factory -- I was in China last week. We have a factory there that is making money. It has got a lot of production capacity in front of us. We are working with the Chinese government on standards. So I think we are really well positioned in what has the potential to be one of the best markets for Aerial Work Platforms in the future.

Your next question comes from the line of Joel Tiss of Bank of Montreal.

Wow, I made it. All right, just real quick, Ron, can you talk about any other leverage you might have in addition to the operations, the restructurings and the margin improvement if in kind of a slow recovery to try to drive toward those 2015 goals?

The most important thing we have in this company is the dedication of our people. We have a great leadership team, experienced. Everybody on the leadership staff has well over seven, eight years experience on average, double digit years of experience with the Company. They understand what it is like to be part of a cyclical capital goods business.

We have got an organization where the individual can make a big difference in the outcomes of the Company. We have great values, a commitment to compliance, and I think that is really our secret weapon as a company. It is the dedication and the focus of our team members.

That doesn't mean that we can overcome negative markets because the reality of a cyclical capital goods business is that in a hurricane you are going get wet. But we do know how to come out of it, and we know how to focus, and I think our team members are pretty committed folks.

Your next question comes from the line of Andy Casey of Wells Fargo Securities.

Good morning, and thanks. A couple of short questions on Cranes, and I will glue them together. Last quarter you talked about potential second half weakness in the US rough terrain crane demand. Did that happen and is that the part of the market where the inventory headwind you referred to is located? And then quickly on top of that, are you hearing anything about any difficulty in some contractors getting financing for cranes, given that they have lived through pretty extended period of low utilization? Thanks.

Tim?

Sure. The North American market is where we see the excess channel inventory. And again, as I said earlier, it is four to six weeks of excess. It is not months of excess. So I think it is a modest market. It is -- we are kind of chugging along. Our rough terrain business is down a little bit year-over-year, mostly due to the North American softness. But we are seeing pockets of strength in North America too, particularly in the energy market.

Anything to do with oil and gas right now is very strong. If you look at where the opportunities are for us, it is in the Gulf, it is in the Upper Midwest, and it is in Canada. And that is where the North American opportunity is. So we will bleed through this channel inventory over the next three or four months, and I'm pretty sure that by the time we get into 2014 we will be back to kind of normal levels of inventory.

Okay.

Your next question comes from the line of Steven Fisher of UBS.

Thanks very much. Just on the Middle East Cranes, which you characterized as the only pure growth market. What kind of growth rate in backlog or sales have you seen there? Is it single digit or double digit? How steady is it quarter to quarter, and then is there any particular country you are seeing strength in? Thank you.

Yes, our business in the Middle East is doing very well. We are up 150%-plus this year. So we think we've both gained share in that region and benefited from a growing market. So when you look at the opportunity for us from that part of the world, it is very strong. And I might expand to the Middle East comment to include some of the Stans and Turkey and that -- it is that general region of the world that is doing very well for us.

In terms of backlog and order strength, that is where a lot of our -- where our backlog is today. And when we look at our weekly order quotation activity, we continue to see a lot of strong work there. So I'm pretty bullish on that part of the world and continue to think it is going to be strong into 2014.

Your next question comes from the line of Adam Fleck of Morningstar.

Hi, good morning. Thanks for taking my question. Just a quick housekeeping on working capital. I appreciate the confirmation you are still targeting 22% of sales. I'm just curious how you are going to get there. Is that an inventory story, or is there another line item we are going to look at?

Kevin?

Yes, no, absolutely looking at getting a fair amount that improvement out of inventory across most of our businesses actually.

Your next question comes from the line Yilma Abebe of JPMorgan.

Thank you. Good morning. If you could remind us, please, your debt reduction and the targets going forward. And then secondly, to get to your free cash flow guidance for the year, it looks like it applies [lower] working capital. Perhaps if you can comment on which segments of our business we should expect to see lower working capital?

I will take that question. So we have been pretty active, right, in terms of activity this year on the balance sheet. $220 million out in Q2. We took out the largest portion of our minority interest in our Demag business. There was another chunk of Italian debt that we took out in July. So we have been very active in terms of de-leveraging the business this year, and that will continue into 2014.

From a free cash flow perspective we are still confident we will be over $400 million for the year. That would put us at above $138 million for Q4, and yes, we do expect some of that to come from inventory reductions. I think we will see inventory reductions in AWP. Certainly in Cranes and in Construction would, [we believe], the primary business segments that we would expect for it to show up.

Great, Kevin. Thank you. I think that finishes the questions, and I want to thank everyone for your interest and patience with us today. I apologize if some of you didn't get to ask your whole question or finish your question. It was not for lack of trying here. We had a lot of interest in our call and information this morning. I encourage any and all to follow up with Tom Gelston or Kevin Bradley or any of us that can help. Thank you for your interest in the Company.

Thank you. This concludes today's conference call. You may now disconnect.