PAR Technology Corp (PAR) 2012 Q2 法說會逐字稿

Good day, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the FY 2012 second-quarter financial results conference call. My name is Tawanda and I will be your coordinator for today. At this time, all participants are in listen-only mode. Later we will conduct a question-and-answer session. (Operator Instructions) As a reminder, this conference is being recorded for replay purposes.

I would now like to turn the conference over to Mr. Paul Domorski, President and CEO. Please proceed, sir.

Thank you, Tawanda. Good morning, everyone. I would like to welcome you to the PAR Technology second-quarter 2012 conference call. Joining me is Ron Casciano, PAR's Chief Financial Officer.

Before we begin I want you to know that any statements made during the course of this call regarding product expectations, program opportunities, schedules, and future financial results are forward-looking statements. Actual events or results could, of course, differ materially.

I refer you to the statement of risk factors in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, and to our press release. These are documents that identify important factors that could cause such a variance.

During the course of this call we will take questions from participants. Under SEC rules we cannot provide material information in subsequent private settings, but will continue this public call as needed to discuss and respond to appropriate questions.

As is customary, after I provide my views of the quarter, I will turn it over to Ron for his comments. From there, we would be happy to take any questions you might have.

Thank you for your continued interest in PAR Technology. Well, let me begin.

We announced this morning that we reported second-quarter revenues of $62.1 million and a net loss of $511,000, or $0.03 loss per diluted share. This compares to the prior-year second-quarter results from continuing operations on a non-GAAP basis of $56.4 million in revenue, and net earnings of $1.3 million or $0.09 per diluted share. $0.02 of the $0.03 net loss per share was a non-operating loss associated with the sale of common stock received as consideration as part of the Company's divestiture of its Logistics Management business in January.

As stated in today's press release, our results were impacted by the slowdown in our business with our largest Hospitality customer, McDonald's, due to the completion of their large in-store technology initiative. We still have a very good relationship with McDonald's. They continue to buy from us; we anticipate future revenue growth in the quarters that follow. It is just at a lower level presently than it was when we were doing the large US rollout.

Although this quarter we were able to make up the difference and actually post an overall 10% gain in revenues for the quarter, our product mix for the quarter was not able to bridge the short-term gap of profits as we continue to fill the business lines with new customers across all of our Hospitality and Government segment business lines. We certainly view this situation as temporary and are quite confident with the opportunities before us in Hospitality and the Government segments.

With the completion of the McDonald's initiative, we continue to seek out other avenues of revenue. We are expanding our reach.

Product revenues with Yum! Brands increased 69%, with larger sales to all three of their concepts -- Taco Bell, KFC, and Pizza Hut. We also continue to pick up market share with the Subway account as they continue their aggressive new store expansion plans. Product revenues grew by 33% in the quarter and the plan is for continued strong sales.

Overall, international sales were up despite challenging economic conditions, and we had good growth in China often an admittedly small base. Restaurant software was a solid contributor.

On the technology and product innovation front, we announced last week our new EverServ 7000 hardware platform. If you want to see it or understand more about it, you can go on our webpage. You won't be able to miss it.

The 7000 offers high performance with increased processing speed, enhanced graphics, and serviceability by ensuring the terminal's ease of service, including remote diagnostics. The new design enhances the ability to remotely manage the terminal and to make it scalable for multiple component options such as CPU, memory, touch screen, disk drives, customer input displays, etc. The EverServ 7000 supports various multi-touch options or gesture-based applications on supporting operating systems and, finally, the flexibility and capability to be mounted almost anywhere whether it be on the wall, a low profile, or in a kiosk.

We believe we have a very good opportunity to deploy our new 7000 product in many of the largest quick service chains. At last week's Subway national convention, the EverServ 7000 was prominently displayed and we were very pleased with the reaction.

Last quarter we announced that the largest retailer in the world, Walmart, would be deploying our SureCheck product. They are a terrific launch partner. We are in the process of deploying the solution in their domestic locations.

PAR EverServ SureCheck is a powerful, web-based tool for managing hazards analysis and critical control points, or HACCP, and inspection programs for the retail and food service organizations. The SureCheck solution combines a PDA-based mobile application, cloud-based enterprise server, and a fully-integrated temperature measuring device to automate the monitoring of quality risk factors while enhancing associate accuracy.

While we announced the Walmart transaction just last quarter, I can assure you that we were in discussions with them well before that. We are presently engaged in substantive discussions with other major retailers about SureCheck, and I believe that will lead over time to new announcements.

We are standardizing and adding new feature functionality to the product that we will be announcing shortly. That will speed our time-to-market.

Food safety continues to be an important concern to retailers and restaurants. The Food Safety Modernization Act was signed into law late last year.

Focus on food safety and the role technology will play in that will only increase. Focusing on additional strategic accounts will only enhance our financials in this exciting emerging market.

On February 14, last quarter, we announced Personality Hotels would be deploying our ATRIO hotel management solution. You can go on our webpage or go on YouTube and see them talking about their experience with ATRIO.

On June 26, we named Pegasus Solutions as a preferred central reservations provider in the ATRIO platform partner exchange, enabling a tightly coupled integration between Pegasus' central reservation system and the ATRIO platform. On July 11, we announced our stronger partnership with Windows Azure to take advantage of Microsoft's advanced technology resources and domain experience. Again you can look at our website and see the video we did in conjunction with Microsoft.

Our restaurant software will be deployed as the food and beverage module on the ATRIO service bus. We are buying or building best-of-breed modules of functionality to add to the ATRIO enterprise bus.

Building on the back of these announcements and the success we've had with the individual deployments, we have been working on scaling the product, enabling it to be deployed to much larger organizations. We have already demonstrated that ATRIO delivers compelling functionality and economics in a property. Soon we will demonstrate that it is replicable across multiple property and that it scales.

Just as we did with SureCheck with Walmart, we want a world-class launch partner to demonstrate our capability. I think you will see the results of our efforts in that area shortly. From there, we think we would be well positioned to address the aging hotel industry technology we saw when we made the decision to build ATRIO.

Both ATRIO and SureCheck are cloud-based products sold primarily as SaaS, or software-as-a-service. We are building long-term value.

In the quarter, we had several new international customer installs of our standalone SpaSoft software package to five-star properties in Panama, Japan, the Philippines, Germany, and Austria. In the past quarter, we also had additional complete heritage property management systems installed in two Victor International results in Michigan and the British Virgin Islands.

Our Government segment delivered record revenues in the second quarter. Revenue increased by 60% over the same period in 2011, and operating income grew by 45% from the second-quarter 2011.

Growth continues to be driven by the contract to support the U.S. Army and the U.S. Air Force with intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance technologies and services, called the Eagle Intel-X contract. Even with a strong second quarter for this segment, market conditions dictate lengthened product procurement cycles to the federal government, to make the timing of new awards difficult to predict.

We are noticing consistent funding programs and attention being focused upon intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance, -- again like the Eagle Intel-X -- and see growth opportunities in the future, but don't yet see the kind of numbers that we are able to predict. We are continuing to explore commercial opportunities associated with full-motion video products related to the large DoD integrations of the ISR contracts and have also identified several US military communication sites that are up for bid.

Contract margins were 5.2%, down from the 5.7% reported in the second quarter of 2011 and well within our historical range of 5% to 6%. Our Government business ended the quarter with a healthy $103 million backlog.

So in summary, despite lower expenses, an unfavorable shift in product mix, coupled with higher revenues from our Government business at a lower gross margin percentage, diluted our consolidated total, resulting in a loss for the quarter. Despite this, the management of the Company is encouraged about PAR's prospects.

Our two cloud-based products, ATRIO and EverServ SureCheck, continued to draw increasing industry in the marketplace and we're engaged in numerous discussions with large, potential customers. Our momentum in restaurants (technical difficulty) [hardware] received a major boost with last week's introduction of our new EverServ 7000 point-of-sale platform. Our Government business had a record quarter.

Last but certainly not least, our financial strength remains strong with more than $17 million of cash and investments on the balance sheet and virtually no debt.

I would now like to turn the call over to our CFO, Ron Casciano, for his remarks on the financials.

Thank you, Paul, and good morning, everyone. Let's look at the some of the second-quarter details from continuing operations. For comparison purposes the 2011 amounts are non-GAAP, in that they exclude the one-time charges reported in Q2 of last year.

Product revenue for the quarter was $21.1 million, a decrease of 11% compared to the same quarter of 2011. This decline was due to the completion of the large technology upgrade program in 2011 associated with domestic McDonald's restaurants. The Company was able to partially offset this drop with increase in sales to Yum! Brands and Subway.

Additionally, international revenues grew 7% on sales to McDonald's and several smaller concepts.

Service revenue for the quarter was $16 million, a decrease of 8% compared to the second quarter of 2011, which is due to fewer deployments related to the decline in product revenue. Contract revenue was a record $25.9 million for the quarter, an increase of 60% from 2011, reflecting the ISR integration contract that was awarded last year.

Product margins for the quarter were 30.3% versus 38.6% in 2011. This change was due to the unfavorable hardware and peripheral product mix as the Company sold fewer systems in 2012.

Service margins for the quarter were 28.4%, slightly higher than 28% in last year's quarter. Contract margins were 5.2% compared to 5.7% last year, and this was within our normal historical range of 5% to 6%.

SG&A for the quarter was $9.3 million compared to $9.1 million in 2011, an increase of 3% which was due to marketing activities associated with the McDonald's biannual worldwide convention. R&D expense declined 7% to $3.1 million in the quarter. This was due to our completion of the initial deployment phase associated with our next-gen cloud-based ATRIO property management solution.

PAR's financial condition remains strong. We now have $17.1 million of cash and investments on the balance sheet. The Company continues to maintain an excellent debt-to-equity ratio, and we further reduced our debt level during the quarter to $1.8 million.

Cash flow from continuing operations was $3.7 million for the quarter, and the Company expects to continue to fund any future working capital requirements from cash flow from operations. I am pleased to report that days sales outstanding for our Hospitality business were at 52 days and DSOs for our Government business were at 50 days.

Depreciation and amortization for the quarter was $919,000. Capital expenditures for equipment was $1 million in the second quarter, and capitalized software for this quarter was $943,000.

That concludes my remarks, and I would now like to open up the call for questions. Thank you.

(Operator Instructions) Sam Bergman, Bayberry Asset Management.

Good morning, Paul, Ron, and Chris. How are you? A couple questions. Can you give us a comparison at all of the ATRIO versus the OPERA 9 from MICROS?

Well, I mean ATRIO is a product which was built for the cloud. It is not a -- it is typically sold as a SaaS model as opposed to an enterprise model.

ATRIO is a product which was developed two years ago. OPERA has been developed many years before that. While certainly OPERA has lots of functionality, it doesn't have the architectural benefits of a purpose-built cloud-based product that we've built.

I thought the 9 had some cloud-based technology and it was also a SaaS model.

Well, I mean -- ATRIO was purpose-built cloud-based. It has got Azure as its core technology. Taking existing product and adding some functionality to the cloud does not have the same benefits that a cloud-based product does.

Okay. Can you give us some better timeline of when you think there would be a significant partner in the hotel space with the ATRIO?

Well, I think in my prepared comments, Sam, that I said we are working on it and I think I used the word shortly. I know that is not specific, but we believe that we will in a reasonable period of time have a marquee customer, much like what we did in SureCheck.

In SureCheck, can you -- on that product line, do you have a devoted salesforce for that?

We have sales reps who are focused on that product as well as some of our restaurant software business.

So, could you tell me what is the biggest reason Walmart would buy the product versus, let's say, a retail food chain?

Well, I mean --

Or a restaurant chain?

Oh, sorry, I misunderstood your question.

Would there be any difference in the purpose of them buying that technology?

Some, I think. I think that there are -- I mean there are scenarios that make a lot of sense for the food chain industry as well as for the retailers. I mean in the case of Walmart, it is a combination of temperature monitoring -- you would be amazed by the number of temperature monitoring that occurs in a store. I mean there was a -- in some instances we have looked at some retailers that have had 60,000 or 70,000 chains and they're doing millions and millions of temperature monitoring in a year on those properties. So, part of it is temperature monitoring.

The other part of it is being able to assimilate the data across all of the different Walmart properties, more than 4,000, into a consistent format. The second thing is being able to do the task management, ensuring that there is consistent implementation across all their properties of all of the tasks that occur.

So, I think there was -- I think we had a conversation in one of my first, earlier calls where we talked about what -- the beauty of the product is we are replacing logs and paper. There literally are three-ring binders that people use to track what happens in these stores.

And as a result of that, when you compare that to the SureCheck application, the economics are very compelling. And again, that is why we are optimistic about the product.

Do you presently have a pretty good pipeline of customers looking at it?

The answer is yes, but I want to caution you and everyone that in order to get a large retailer to adopt it across their entire chain, it takes some time. So we have -- we built a solution that was adopted by Walmart. Walmart and we are productizing it, and that will speed our adoption in the market.

We believe that there will be other, subsequent marquee retailers who will adopt it. And we believe we will have traction in the foodservice market as well with the product.

The last question, I did look at the EverSure 7000. I think it is a really nice product for the Company. I think you will go places with that.

But I wanted to ask you, in terms of software, and software for the QSR market, it seems that in the past it was lacking. And I am not really seeing any software or new software releases that can drive those revenues and grow the bottom line.

Well, we have had releases of our product. We announced version 11 of our Pixel in Fall of last year. We announced EverServ QSR 1.4, I believe, -- maybe you guys are nodding your head -- early this year. I don't remember again the specific dates in that area.

We are continuing to enhance the value of the product itself. I mentioned before that it's likely to go in as a module in our hotel management system as well. So those are the applications and places that we are putting it.

But if you look at the size you are with MICROS, you are one-fifth the size of MICROS yet you spend more money on the R&D side, and I don't see the R&D effort on the software doing as well as MICROS. I am just wondering if too much is being spent there, or we are attacking the wrong avenue of technology.

Well, I would give you this example, Sam, which is if you look at, for example, our SureCheck product today, we have one major customer and some other smaller customers for the R&D that we put into the product. And all that exists today.

Largely the same situation with it ATRIO. We have a certain number of customers for the R&D that we put into the product today. So as we deploy that product in the market, those numbers will get better.

Where do you feel R&D is going to remain for the rest of the year?

Ron?

Sam, R&D will remain flat pretty much over the rest of the year.

Okay. Thank you very much. Good luck in the upcoming quarters, guys.

Lee Matheson, Broadview Capital Management.

Hi, guys. Good morning. So just as you guys sit here, given the cash pile keeps growing, and you mentioned either buying or building modules for I presume both Hospitality and on the restaurant side in the software, component. What do you guys think you need to add in terms of functionality or specific items?

And what can be bought and what can be built? How big should we be thinking about in terms of capital deployment into this area?

Well, let me make sure I'm answering your question. In the context of ATRIO, we have what we call an enterprise service bus, and there are various modules of functionality that are built into that bus. As I said in my prepared comments, Lee, some of those we will develop internally. Some of them we will buy, because we are a best-of-breed provider, and if the internal solution is not the best, then we will buy a module for the enterprise bus.

As we do that it expands the revenue potential of the ATRIO product that we have today. Because it has -- you could add a module, for example, on golf for example, and that would be an example, or a spa module, where those things are modules that will add to the revenue stream that is associated with the ATRIO product.

So that is part of what we are seeking to do, is we are adding out the functionality. The prior caller, Sam, touched on this as well, which is comparing against our competitors. They have some functionality there. We have been adding some functionality in these areas, strategically to what our existing product is.

Beyond that, we continue to look at how best to reposition the Company, and that effort is underway. And I really don't have much more to comment on that, other than we continue to seek to build long-term shareholder value.

Sure. I guess what I am trying to get at is, in terms of adding these modules, can you do it through in-licensing from third-party developers? Or would any of these specific modules involve you laying out millions of dollars to do an acquisition? Or would these all be incremental little tie-in deals?

I would describe probably more of your categorization of the last one, the (multiple speakers) category. I mean it is more of us partnering with people and/or deciding to augment our existing capability or work on our existing products to make them suitable for the product.

Right. Is there any area in particular that you think that your product is lacking, in terms of an area that is preventing you from generating sales or interest in the product, because you just don't have a module?

No.

No? Okay. Then on the Government side, I'm just curious. I think you mentioned backlog $103 million. My notes indicate that we were at $134 million contract backlog at the end of the year.

I know that number can be volatile. But I guess can you just comment on how confident you are in that, in the backlog number?

Yes, Lee, this is Ron. The backlog has trended down as we started to work on that large Intel-X contract that we have talked about, which was a big driver for the revenue in the second quarter. Certainly the pipeline for the Government business looks promising. We hope to have some new wins later in the year that will grow the backlog back up somewhat.

But the $100 million that we have now is solid. And, of course, the caveat is every contract with the government has the wonderful clause that they can cancel at any time. So I have to mention that.

Fair enough. Ultimately, you mentioned creating shareholder value. Is the divestiture of the Government business still something that is discussed at the Board level?

We have no plans to divest our Government business at present.

Okay, thank you.

Vincent Colicchio, Noble Financial.

Good morning, guys. Looks like China -- you mentioned in your prepared statements that China picked up. Wondering if we should expect continued improvement there? Or, Paul, in your opinion if we need more investment before we can see meaningful traction?

Well, I think in the international world, we will continue to -- there are some significant areas that we are very optimistic about in that region. There are some large bids we are engaged in, in that space as well. So I think we are reasonably optimistic.

In fact, some of the opportunity is greater there than it is in the US, because of the growth in the fast food restaurants.

Will that require a lot of -- some incremental investment of meaningful size, in your opinion?

No, Vince, we don't think it will be anything meaningful.

Okay. Do you expect, Paul, the growth from the EverServ software product in restaurants in upcoming quarters? In particular I am wondering about the ramp of Subway and Baskin-Robbins, if that continues.

I think -- I mean the ramp-up is certainly going, as evidenced by the numbers that I talked about in my earlier comments. In regards to it EverServ's QSR I think we will have opportunities in the restaurant market as well as, as I mentioned earlier, in the hotel segment as it becomes part of the ATRIO product.

But I guess at this point not ready to say that you will see growth sequentially going forward?

I think --

We will see some growth going forward, although as you know, Vince, the base is a modest base. So we should see growth in overall restaurant software going forward in the second half of the year.

As relates to the SureCheck, could you talk -- give us a little bit of color in terms of -- are there a lot of competitive products out there? What does that look like? And if so, what is your -- what do you think gets you into these accounts?

Well, you can go out onto the Web and put the key words in and do a search, and you'll get a bunch of products that might at face value look similar. But when you look at the product itself -- and I can assure you that the customers that have looked at it go through that process. There is no product that we believe has anywhere near the feature functionality and benefits associated with the Walmart product -- with the SureCheck product which is deployed at Walmart.

Thanks, guys. I'll go back to the queue.

(Operator Instructions) Lee Matheson, Broadview Capital Management.

Hey, guys, just quickly, I know you it's going to come out with the Q. But are you guys going to disclose just revenue concentration with McDonald's and Yum! in the quarter?

Yes, sure, Lee. For the quarter, McDonald's revenue was 19% of the total Company revenue, and Yum! was 14%.

Great. Thanks, Ron.

Sam Bergman, Bayberry Asset Management.

Just a follow-up question. On the McDonald's business, was there last business this quarter because the other partner, Panasonic, took away some business or your percentage from the McDonald's Corporation?

No, Sam.

In terms of their next upgrade, when do you expect that -- the beginnings of that, or when it will be in full force?

I'll answer you. I don't know when they are going to upgrade their US equipment. I can tell you that there is more activity outside the US than there is inside the US at present.

Okay. Very good. Thank you.

With no further questions, I would now like to turn the conference over to Mr. Paul Domorski for closing remarks.

All right. Thank you, Tawanda. Thank you, everyone, for coming on today's call. We look forward to talking to you next quarter. Bye now.

Thank you for joining today's conference. That concludes the presentation. You may now disconnect and have a great day.