明晟 (MSCI) 2019 Q2 法說會逐字稿

Good day, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the MSCI Second Quarter 2019 Earnings Conference Call.

(Operator Instructions) As a reminder, this conference call is being recorded.

I would like to now turn the call over to Mr. Andrew Wiechmann, Chief Strategy Officer.

You may begin.

Thank you, Shannon.

Good day, and welcome to the MSCI Second Quarter 2019 Earnings Conference Call.

Earlier this morning, we issued a press release announcing our results for the second quarter, which is available on our website along with our earnings presentation and a second quarter update.

A copy of the release, second quarter update and a slide presentation that we have prepared for this call may be viewed at msci.com under the Investor Relations tab.

Let me remind you that this call contains forward-looking statements.

You're cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date on which they are made and are governed by the language on the second slide of today's presentation.

For a discussion of additional risks and uncertainties, please see the risk factors and forward-looking statements disclaimer in our most recent Form 10-K and our other SEC filings.

During today's call, in addition to results presented on the basis of U.S. GAAP, we also refer to non-GAAP measures, including but not limited to, organic operating revenue growth rates, adjusted EBITDA, adjusted EBITDA expenses, adjusted EPS and free cash flow.

We believe our non-GAAP measures facilitate meaningful period-to-period comparisons and provide insight into our core operating performance.

You'll find a reconciliation to the equivalent GAAP measures in the earnings materials and an explanation of why we deem this information to be meaningful as well as how management uses these measures on Pages 21 to 28 of the earnings presentation.

We will also discuss organic run-rate growth figures, which exclude the impact of changes in foreign currency and the impact of any acquisitions or divestitures.

On the call with me today are Henry Fernandez, our Chairman and CEO; Baer Pettit, our President; and Linda Huber, our Chief Financial Officer.

With that, let me now turn the call over to Mr. Henry Fernandez.

Henry?

Thank you, Andy.

Hello, everyone, and thank you for joining us today.

Before I start, I would like to say that we're very pleased to have Linda do her first quarterly report to you all on MSCI.

I hope you treat her well and she does a good job, right?

So our strong performance and momentum in the quarter is being driven by continued strength in all of our offerings.

Accelerated by the incredibly attractive opportunities we see across a broad range of new growth from peers.

During the first half of each year, our Board and the management team conduct an annual strategic planning process where we explore in great detail relevant plan dynamics, industry developments and all of our MSCI capabilities with a goal of prioritizing the most attractive focus areas for the firm.

This year, we came away from the process with an overwhelming sense of excitement about the future of MSCI, and we reaffirm our belief that we are only scratching the surface of what is possible to achieve with this franchise.

With the data management, advanced analytical models and sophisticated technology becoming increasingly critical to the investment industry and the role and the value of MSCI is growing every single day.

An important discussion internally then has become, how we fuel the investments necessary to pursue the many opportunities we have while preserving our high profit margins.

As we have discussed in the past, we have a very rigorous focus on allocating our capital to the highest-returning projects through our internal capital allocation process.

We think of our internal spending across 2 broad categories: run the business expenses and change the business investments.

Run the business expenses relate to supporting the existing products and capabilities in their current form, while change the business investments relate to enhancing the system business and even more importantly, creating new growth areas for us.

A top priority for us is to increase investments allocated to change the business activities.

We do this by improving efficiency and productivity and, therefore, squeezing and reducing expenses across run-the-business activities.

This way, we can continue to allocate investments to the highest-returning projects and consequently, grow faster and be even more profitable.

We spent a little bit of time talking about all of this at the Investor Day.

We see a long runway of opportunities and growth for our current run-the-business activities.

But we're also extremely excited about the growth potential for the change-the-business activities.

Some examples of these are: First, new high-growth areas of content creation such as ESG and factors for both equity and fixed income.

Fixed income Analytics and indices and real estate and other private asset classes.

A second example is new client areas such as wealth management.

Key geographies such as Asia, and new index licensing opportunities such as futures and options, listed on exchanges and, obviously, derivatives issued by banks and broker dealers.

And the third example is new distribution channels, a new content enabling technology that allows for those distribution channels to prosper.

These are all very attractive investment areas in their own right.

In addition to complementing and driving even more value to our existing index Analytics franchises.

Over the last several months, we have had several notable developments that reinforce our conviction around this change the business investment areas.

Let me highlight a few of these developments.

First, across content creation dimension.

In the first half of the year, 40% of inflows into all U.S. exposure equity ETFs went into ETFs linked to MSCI Indices primarily driven by a $9 billion inflow into EPS linked to our Factor indices.

Globally, there was a total of $14 billion of inflows into ETFs linked to our Factor indices.

By leveraging our cutting-edge fixed income factor model, we rolled out a new tier multi-asset class Factor framework, which allows clients to seamlessly analyze their portfolios from the highest level of factors all the way down to the most granular ones across any asset class and within any of this -- and within a one cohesive tier framework.

In fixed income Analytics, this quarter we added a series of new corporate credit curves, which broadened and enhanced our fixed income and multi-asset class capabilities.

One, as example in this content creation category is that we have internally launched a series of fixed income Factor indices that we expect to release to the market later this year.

In looking at the client and product dimensions, let me highlight a few of the new developments that have give us conviction about our investment plan.

We continue to deliver double-digit organic subscription run rate growth of 13% across Asia, 11% within Real Estate, and 19% and 25% for indices and ESG products sold to wealth managers respectively.

In Q2 the notion of value trade-in in listed futures and options linked to MSCI indices reached a record level of $1.4 trillion, with contract volume at near record levels of 29 million contracts.

This has been fueled by a strong traction in listed futures and options based on our flagship indices, such as the emerging market and the EAFE indices, which together grew in total 24% year-over-year.

But in addition to that we also had new launches in futures contracts, especially in MSCI Saudi Arabia index.

Within the market for multicountry, multicurrency listed and over the counter derivatives is potentially very significant and we intend to be one of the largest index providers in this area.

All the cases that I have cited are good examples of areas where our recent investments and innovation have driven highly profitable, long-term growth in relatively new areas in addition to our existing trajectory of growth in the run-the-business areas.

Let me now turn the call over to Baer, who will do a deeper dive into one of our specific areas of growth that I briefly mentioned, which we're extremely excited about.

In this quarter, this focus will be on the index ecosystem and the critical role that index-linked derivatives can play in that.

Baer?

Thank you, Henry.

As we've talked about in the past, there are 3 important pillars to our index franchise: Active management, passive or what we call indexed management and derivatives.

These 3 areas reinforce each other creating an ecosystem of investment and trading activity around our indexes that is globally interconnected.

Asset owners who use our indexes as benchmarks will use investible products to equitize cash and manage their exposure relative to the benchmark.

These asset owners and active managers will use exchange traded and OTC index-linked derivatives to hedge their investments, achieve customized exposures and manage risks relative to the benchmark.

The OTC derivative markets for equity indexes have become larger over the years, but have high carrying cost for sell-side market participants.

The transition from OTC to listed markets helps these products reduce costs.

As volume and liquidity grows in these derivatives, the increased liquidity facilitates the participation of the trading community, benefiting the ecosystem of ETFs and the OTC market.

So success in any one of these pillars of our ecosystem creates a virtuous circle that helps drive demand in the others.

Within this MSCI index ecosystem, the pillar that has been least developed is derivatives.

This is a relatively new growth area for us that we believe could be substantial over time.

Historically, the market for a listed index-linked derivatives was almost entirely focused on single market, single currency derivatives where the trading hours and currencies of all the underlying securities were the same.

Over the last decade, trading technology has progressed, and our exchange partners have increasingly had success at educating the global trading community on how to trade in listed futures based on our indexes, which are mostly multimarket, multicurrency in nature.

To help accelerate the growth of this opportunity, we have invested in building out a team comprised of several key individuals focused heavily on licensing our indexes for listed and OTC derivatives.

This team is broadening and deepening our relationships with exchanges and broker-dealers who are generating a healthy pipeline of new index-linked derivative product launches and an elevated focus on promoting index-linked derivatives.

Investments in building this team have already provided returns and a quick payback.

We are seeing our exchange partners invest in marketing, sales coverage, sell-side partnerships and market maker programs, which aim to foster liquidity formation.

Within broker-dealers, we see our clients finding numerous new opportunities to serve their retail and institutional clients with structured products like index-linked notes, swaps and options.

Most of these are based on our market cap indexes but increasingly are also used for Factor overlays as well as thematic in ES&G tilts.

The incremental revenue to MSCI from licensing these products should be high-margin over time with lower cost growth as we leverage our existing IT.

In 2018, revenue from listed futures and options based on our indexes was $17.1 million having grown at a CAGR of 37% from $4.8 million in 2014.

The notional value of the open interest on listed futures and options based on our indexes has grown at a CAGR of 54% over the last 3 years.

We believe this area could have a long trajectory of attractive growth and profitability.

As one measure of the potential opportunity in this area, many futures contracts based on single market, single currency indexes from other providers have meaningfully higher traded notional values relative to their ETF AUM linked to those indexes than those of MSCI.

Our active focus on index-linked derivatives highlights just one strong example of how we are investing to capitalize on the wide range of new growth frontiers in front of us.

While we are discussing the pillars of index growth, I thought it would be important to provide a brief update on our iShares relationship.

The current terms of our ETF licenses are scheduled to expire in March of next year subject to relatively short-term evergreen renewal provisions.

We are now engaged in advance constructive discussions with iShares around a new long-term agreement.

Our objective is to continue to expand our successful partnership by balancing the price volume mix in order to maximize long-term revenue growth.

Please note that we'll not be able to answer questions or provide more information about the negotiations until we have a final agreement, which we expect to occur within the next few months.

And with that, I'll turn the call over to Linda to take us through the financial highlights and discuss guidance for the remainder of the year.

Linda?

Thanks, Baer, and hello to everyone on the call.

MSCI's second quarter was another quarter of strong financial performance.

On the operating front our performance was solid but a tough lap given the exceptional second quarter in 2018.

The double-digit organic subscription run rate growth was driven by strength across regions and major client segments.

Specifically, the Americas were up 8%, EMEA was up 11% and Asia was up 13%.

Asset owners, asset managers and broker-dealers, which collectively comprise more than 80% of our subscription run rate, saw organic subscription run rate growth of 9%, 10% and 10%, respectively.

Our strong focus on continually adding value to our clients has helped us achieve a retention rate of 95.5% in Q2, the highest level in the last decade.

Our consistently high retention rates have helped drive organic subscription run rate growth of approximately 10% for the last 7 consecutive quarters.

For recurring net new sales, the first half was up 11% with Q2 down 3%.

As I mentioned previously, the lower growth rate in the second quarter was the result of lapping a very strong Q2 2018.

Also in Q2, we saw continued momentum across product segments.

I'll now discuss specifics for each of the product lines.

First for ESG.

We continued our exceptional run across client segments and geographies.

Within client segments, run rate growth was 24% for our largest segment, asset managers, which was complemented by exceptional growth of more than 50% for hedge funds and broker-dealers.

Across geographies, we had run rate growth of 50% in Asia, 27% in EMEA and 18% in the Americas.

It was also our second highest quarter ever in terms of both recurring sales and recurring net new sales for ESG.

Second, Index delivered another quarter of double-digit subscription run rate growth with Factors growing at 25%, ESG growing at 48% and custom and specialized modules growing at 14%.

And we continue to see consistent performance in our core market cap products, which had 10% growth.

Additionally, we have strong retention rate of 97%.

Third, for Analytics, as we repeatedly mentioned in previous calls, operating metrics can be lumpy quarter-over-quarter.

This is increasingly so as we're seeing larger and more complex deals being closed.

Our recurring sales for the quarter was $14 million, lower than second quarter of 2018, which was itself up 44% over Q2 '17 making for a tough comparison.

However, recurring sales were up 7% compared to the first quarter of 2019.

We continue to have positive momentum with a strong retention rate of 94% and continued strength in multi-asset class and fixed income Analytics, which collectively had run rate growth of 7%.

And finally, for Real Estate, our organic run rate growth was 11% with strong traction in our market information offering.

Finally, we'd like to spotlight our nonrecurring or onetime sales, which were up 7% to $9 million versus the prior year period primarily driven by increased sales in our index derivatives and RiskManager product offerings.

Next, turning to our performance in ABF.

We continued to benefit from our focus on derivatives with listed futures and options revenue growing 20% driven by 17% year-over-year volume growth.

Most notably, volume and listed futures linked to MSCI's EM and EAFE indices together grew 24%.

ETF ABF revenue was down about 1% with a modest increase in year-over-year average AUM in equity ETFs linked to MSCI Indices offset by a year-over-year decline in average basis points.

Equity ETF assets under management linked to MSCI Indexes ended the quarter at $819 billion, up 10% versus prior year driven by market appreciation across all geographies and continued flows into U.S. exposure products offset by outflows from emerging market exposures.

Overall, we saw more than $7 billion of inflows into ETFs based on our Factor and ESG Indexes.

Additionally, there was an inflow of $5.9 billion in funds based on U.S. exposure indexes where half of the flows were in ETFs based on our Factor indexes.

These flows were directed primarily into low volatility products while more than 1/4 of the inflows into ETFs were based on our ESG Indexes.

And turning now to capital allocation.

We're continuing our commitment to returning capital to shareholders with a 17% increase in our quarterly dividend or an increase to $0.68 from $0.58 per share.

We have consistently increased our dividends to shareholders, which has grown at a CAGR of 30% over the last 5 years.

We had no share repurchases during the quarter, as it is our policy to repurchase opportunistically.

As a reminder, however, we have returned more than $1 billion through share repurchases since the beginning of 2018.

Looking at our cash balance.

Our cash balance at the end of Q2 was $771 million.

And note that our policy is to maintain a minimum of approximately $200 million to $250 million of cash globally for general operating purposes.

Turning to free cash flow for Q2.

This was $177 million, down $23 million from Q2 2018.

The primary drivers of this decline were the timing of collections, higher payments for interest payments and cash expenses particularly offset by benefits from lower tax payments.

Our approach to capital allocation remains the same with no changes to our dividend policy, our leverage target or our approach to repurchases.

And lastly, I'd like to provide an update on our guidance for the year.

Given our strong business performance and our focus on driving growth, we will continue with our plan to invest on a number of high-returning growth opportunities.

These investments are expected to drive our adjusted EBITDA expenses and CapEx to the high end of the guidance range or $685 million to $705 million for EBITDA expenses and $45 million to $55 million for CapEx.

With regards to our tax guidance, we expect our full year effective tax rate to be between 8% and 11%.

This includes the income tax benefit related to divesting of certain multiyear PSUs in the first quarter of approximately 11 percentage points, which has been excluded from adjusted EPS.

Excluding this benefit, we expect the effective tax rate used for our adjusted EPS to be in the range of 19% to 22%.

And with that, we'll open the line to take your questions.

(Operator Instructions) Our first question comes from Manav Patnaik with Barclays.

My first question is just around the ESG initiatives.

Obviously, some impressive growth rates there you guys called out.

But maybe just more broadly, we've seen a lot of other names in that space due to make some tuck-in acquisitions, put together their own initiatives, lot of PR around it.

I was just wondering like how you look at the competitive landscape?

And if there is just a bunch of white spaces that maybe everybody has an opportunity here.

So thanks, Manav, for that question.

Clearly the opportunity on ESG or sustainable investing in the world is enormous.

Over time, as ESG factors get integrated into mainstream investing, we may not be talking about ESG investing or sustainable investing, it will be all investing in which if somebody is not taking sustainability into account will be the base in their fiduciary duties, right?

So it's a huge white space.

We have had an incredible success and continue to do so.

We've had a lot of investments into this area that have propelled significant growth.

We have a product set that is cut across-the-board from ESG research for exclusions and screening to ESG ratings, to ESG indices, to ESG as a Factor in risk models.

We are now taking all of that ESG content and putting it into our technology platform distribution channels and the like.

So we are also expanding from ratings into equity, to large amounts of ratings into fixed income, which is an area that we want to focus on.

This -- some of this fixed income indices that I have mentioned that we have lunched internally, our own Factor indices, but the team is also working on ESG indices as well, and the like.

So we feel pretty good of where we are.

A lot of what we're doing is organic growth.

We will also look at acquisition opportunities that present themselves but they have to be very targeted and very value-added for us with the right financial returns.

And I'm sure this area will attract a lot of other providers and competitors, but we feel pretty good about the leadership position that we have and we're maintaining in this space.

Okay.

Fair enough.

And then maybe just for Linda, and welcome to the call.

The comments around the lumpiness in the Analytic sales.

I guess, is that just implying that there was a bunch of contracts that maybe got pushed out?

I was just wondering if you could elaborate on that a little bit more specific to the quarter.

Sure, Manav.

And I'll let Baer add to this.

But as we've said quite a few times and we mentioned in the prepared comments that we've already made, lumpiness is a factor of the Analytics business.

Specifically, if a couple of deals had moved a few days, we would have found the results to be a bit different.

So nothing particularly unusual going on there, and I'll see if Baer has anything else he wants to add.

No.

The only other comment I would make would be about the retention rate, which is up 220 basis points year-on-year.

That's always been an important indicator for us for the health of the Analytics business.

And so I think overall, there's no change in the trend, there's no change in our previous comments and we're carrying on as normal.

Our next question comes from Toni Kaplan with Morgan Stanley.

Henry, historically, you've had a different profile in your Index business and your largest competitor there.

And basically, they've had sort of a bigger piece of their business and asset-based fees and traded products.

And now it seems like you have a real opportunity in the traded product space to get increasingly larger there.

And so I guess, that's an observation but my question is, how do you see MSCI's business model changing over time?

Like do you see the subscription component going down because of the bigger opportunity in the traded products area?

And anything you could add there would be helpful.

Yes, so as Baer indicated, the 3 legs of our stool that keeps the stool together, right, is the active management, passive management and derivatives management, right, exposure management or agent management.

And we traditionally -- we started, obviously, with the subscription part, which is active management and grew that and continued to grow that enormously.

That 10%, 11% growth in index subscription is all active management with a lot of new products, a lot of new clients and a lot of new use cases, et cetera.

Then obviously, way back, we were the inventors of the international ETF business by licensing them to Morgan Stanley, and that has grown enormously and now we're not only international cross-border but we're also domestic -- with domestic indices in many areas like we mentioned about the U.S. exposure indices through factors and ESG and all of that.

And so that we continue to grow and that will be another big runway in our growth there.

And the third part is obviously, derivatives.

We have always been license and broker-dealers about over-the-counter derivatives but the absence of future -- listed futures and options in multicountry, multicurrency indices was a slowdown, was a difficulty in the explosion or the potential growth of over-the-counter derivatives.

So a few years back, maybe 5, 6, 7 years back, the model was broken in the sense that we were able to find a path for this multicountry, multicurrency index futures with our exchange partners to trade in a time zone in which the underlines are sometimes sleeping and, therefore, the success of the MSCI emerging market futures contract, which is now the third largest futures contract in the world in open interest, the EFA contract, and all of that.

So that has created a path forward for this -- the growth of this industry, which should be more logical to have because the investment process in that single country, single currency, the whole investment is global and is regional.

So why should derivatives not be that.

We are anticipating 10 years' time, 15 years' time that actually multicountry, multicurrency derivatives trading may become larger than national ones.

And we want to be the leading -- one of the leading providers of indices in that area.

So and as Baer indicated, this is all an ecosystem that the more derivatives you have, the more trading in ETFs and the more trading in over-the-counter and, hopefully, the more active management that takes place.

So it's all an ecosystem of liquidity and reinforcing one another across the world.

That's very helpful.

And you mentioned launching fixed income Factor indices.

Congratulations.

Obviously, fixed income has been an area that you've been investing in and focusing for some time.

And so I guess, my question is what has changed that has enabled you to be able to provide these now?

Like what has changed internally that has gotten you to this place?

Because [I haven't seen it], it's a little different than history.

Sure.

Yes, so Toni, what's really different is if you think about the equity indexes, from the very outset, they were global and market cap weighted or in fixed income terms issuance weighted.

So what we -- we've taken quite a different strategy in fixed income, which is to start with clearly differentiated.

You could call them more specialized indexes, which will serve very particular client needs and product needs.

So we felt that in this space, we could use some of our -- the thought leadership and the content that we have from fixed income Analytics and also the infrastructure that we have there.

So we -- this has been kind of an exciting little entrepreneurial venture within the firm, and we should be bringing this to market as we said later in the year.

We're having really exciting discussions with some pretty major market counterparties about this.

And for sure, this will not be a major business line in the short run, but we think it will be -- using this model of driving it from a licensing business, we hope to then develop the income to then to self-finance this venture so that it becomes self-financing through licensing income from a very -- the early stages.

So it's small, but I think it will be innovative, it will be different, and I think that's what we hope to do to bring something new and innovative to this space.

Our next question comes from Alex Kramm with UBS.

I guess, just coming back to the Analytics sales question from earlier.

Appreciate the lumpiness in the business but would love to hear updated thoughts on the environment more broadly.

Some of your competitors -- not competitors but other players in this space have certainly acknowledged the consolidation in the industry.

Obviously, struggles on the sell-side in some areas.

So I know you have been very immune so far but just curious how the -- all the environment is getting tougher?

Or what are you experiencing out there?

So Alex, look.

For sure as you're aware the -- all of our -- all the various client bases that we deal with are focused on efficiency and operating their firms and allocating their expenses in the most efficient manner.

That has actually been a central pillar of our Analytics sales strategy.

It actually to go not merely with an analytical offering to give them better understanding of their portfolios, but to work on creating efficiency in their organizations through better data management so that they can use more technology and fewer humans, et cetera.

So I would say that our response to or our strategy had been very much catering to that environment that you refer to.

And consequently, the result is that we continue to be confident with the Analytics story.

We continue to be confident in the matter that we described a steady progression of growth, and at present, even though as we said, there's this lumpiness, there's sometimes a big deal that doesn't make in a given quarter.

Fundamentally, our guidance that we've given before on this product area and how we're managing it and the growth trajectory is unchanged.

I would add to that also Alex, that the -- first of all, it's very important that we say one more time, we're very comfortable where we are in the trajectory of this.

And if we saw any alarm bells or whatever, you're going to be the first one to tell you.

So and all of that.

Secondly, is that, we're very optimistic about all of this because the client that (inaudible) we're having along the lines what Baer described, is pretty positive.

The high level of retention rates that are almost record levels of retention rates in this area which in the past sometimes you all had questions about this are another proof that our offering is sticky to people and, therefore, not subject to competitive pressures, for example.

So that's a second area.

And a third area is that as we improve our technology, not only our content but as we improve our technology it's going to unleash a lot more value of that content in the hands of the clients and that's the one area we're putting a lot of effort into it because we believe that for every unit of content in Analytics we should be selling a lot more but that the handicap there has always been the enabling technology to make the use cases work.

Fair enough.

And then just shifting gears actually to Linda, first of all, welcome to your first earnings call.

Great to have you.

But semi-personal question here but obviously, you've been there for 3 months now.

This is your first earnings call.

Would be very curious to hear what you've been focused on?

What you're seeing from a bigger picture perspective in particular as you kind of make your mark on this organization?

MSCI has become a very, very well-oiled machine over the last few years.

So it seems like there's not much room -- not a lot of room for improvement.

So curious what you think you can do and where you've been spending your time?

Alex, thanks for the very kind question.

Working for Mr. Fernandez here, there is always room for improvement, which I think my colleagues would agree with that statement.

Alex, the real challenge here is to keep the growth trajectory moving forward, and to really take advantage of these incredible opportunities ahead of us.

It's been a great first 90 days.

Been spending my time traveling, learning the business, and the big focus here is on our internal capital allocation process as Henry has said.

We want to make sure we get these investments right, that we put them in the right places where they have strong returns, relatively short payoffs and that we focus on the areas, which are valued most highly by the shareholders.

So this place is a -- quite a well-run machine but there's always opportunity for improvement and I look forward to that as we move into the operating plan part of the cycle.

So Linda's middle name is ICAP.

Linda ICAP Huber, which is internal capital allocation.

Our next question comes from Joseph Foresi with Cantor Fitzgerald.

This is Drew Kootman on for Joe.

Just wanted to touch on the M&A front.

You guys have talked about continuing to expand the new initiatives.

So just seeing how the pipeline looks for that?

Good question.

I mean, the focus on MSCI has traditionally been, in the last X number of years, on organic growth, and we're very proud of that and we want to continue that especially because as our franchise grows and our infrastructure grows, think about the platform of data and content and technology and research, on top of that, the incremental investments in that platform gets lower for every unit of revenue that we can produce.

And therefore, the more organic -- we build a virtual circle that the more organic investments, the higher the rate of return on those investments because they are made at the margin.

The cost is at the margin and the revenue expands dramatically.

So that's one reason why it's pretty imperative to look at mostly organic growth, because we are not going to find those rates of return anywhere else in the marketplace.

Having said that, there are always a few strategic areas that we're looking at to add to those capabilities, but they have to be extensions of what we do, not going out of our field and they have to have very high rates of return because the returns in buying back our shares are extremely high as we proved last year, the internal capital allocation and returns to these projects are extremely high and therefore, the cost of putting capital to work in an acquisition that is great returns but not as great as the organic ones as high.

So that's why we're so focused on this area.

But we look at everything, obviously, because it's our fiduciary duty to do so.

Got it.

And then just wondering if you'd talk about any shifts you're seeing in the demand environment?

And how AUMs are shifting?

What you expect moving forward?

Well I think we -- look, we have been very pleasantly surprised that after an incredibly run-up in '18 in AUM and ETFs and part of '17 with some volatility at the end of '18, of course, right, but the AUM levels have held up extraordinarily high and continue to do so around the world.

There's been a lot of shifts so obviously, emerging markets haven't done as well.

The U.S. market has done incredibly well.

Some developed market areas are stronger, some other ones are weaker, but we're very proud of the diversification we have in all of that, because if the U.S. market is doing well, we have a lot of factor and ESG indices in the U.S. If developed markets do well and the emerging markets do well, we're the big kahuna there, right?

And if we -- and we have a lot of these flows coming in into all these ETFs.

So I think that this is a great franchise and the key is to continue to feed it and diversify it and innovate constantly and that's the reason why the fixed income factor and ESG indices is a big building block into that.

Our next question comes from Bill Warmington with Wells Fargo.

So you highlighted Asia as a growth geography, and I just wanted to ask, how much revenue do you generate from Asia today?

And how much revenue do you think you'll generate from Asia in 5 years?

So look, Asia is an area that we had not been happy with even though it was growing at a healthy pace before, but given the enormous amount of savings that are being -- going into institutional asset owners in Asia, and the enormous amount of wealth creation in individuals and the growth of wealth management in the region, all of that is something that we look at and we say why can we not be growing double or triple what we're growing today.

And we've always been an Asian house.

I for one been visiting Asia for 4 years now consistently and we always had a big presence in Asia in all the countries.

So if anything today, most of our employees are in Asia, just to put that in there.

So therefore, we did a wholesale change of the client coverage team in the last sort of 18 months in Asia with the appointment of a Senior Manager for the whole region.

Some of the country heads were changed.

We reorganized the region.

We are putting product heads and all of that.

And we are so actually, pleasantly surprised how fast that impact has been had in the -- that's why the quarterly reports highlights the growth in Asia even though some of these managers have just arrived in the last few quarters.

So I think that will be great.

I think in terms of a split, right now, of the say -- of when you look at the total subscription run rate, so not including the ETF for a minute, we have about $1.2 billion in subscription and about $200 million of that is Asia or about 13%.

Over the next 10 years, that number has to be a lot bigger and it won't not be because EMEA and America is going down.

It has to be because the rate of growth of Asia needs to be a lot bigger than the other regions and we are now very well positioned to attack that in a big way.

The other thing I would highlight is that when you look at the ETF market, clearly, the vast majority of the ETF linked to the MSCI Indices are listed in the U.S., but a large -- a minority of those ETFs are purchased by Asian investors.

There are some statistics that may be in the order of 20% to 30%, sometimes 15%, 20%, 30% of those ETFs sometimes are purchased by Asian investors in the U.S. time zone.

So a big number, maybe, it's not [high enough] but it's a meaningful number.

It's hard to analyze all of this going underneath the ETFs.

Well, the other question that came to mind as you were discussing all the derivatives was, I was wondering how long was it going to be before we got some ESG derivatives?

Very shortly.

We've got some launches coming up and so for sure you'll see more of those.

We've got some recent launches and the category, which we're very confident will grow.

And then of course, a shout out to Linda just saying congratulations and welcome.

Thanks very much, Bill.

We dug up the Asia run rate number, it's up $200 million.

Obviously, we're looking to improve on that.

We're making some investments in the Asia region particularly in coverage, and we think there's more to come there.

Thanks, again, Bill.

Our next question comes from Hugh Miller with Buckingham.

I had one here with regard to, you noted a really nice business win displacing a competitors standard benchmark with the MSCI U.S.A.

Index.

And also noted just some of your expertise in factors helping to win that.

Obviously, I think you guys enjoy benefits from being the name brand benchmark in several geographies.

Wanted to get a sense of kind of how you guys think about just mitigating displacement risk with the areas that you have very strong name brand recognition in?

And how you think about solidifying your moat to just kind of reduce any displacement risk out there?

Yes, so a few comments.

I think all the remarks that Baer went through in terms of the ecosystem creates a huge moat around our indices because if you're an asset allocator or pension fund or sovereign wealth fund that have -- that you're at an MSCI shop with respect to your policy benchmarks.

You can give active managers, you can do passive, you can do overlays through futures and options, you could do over-the-counter derivatives like swaps and the like, and therefore, you don't have to be deviating from taking basic risk from your benchmark.

So that's a big huge moat around that.

The second big area that we worked on is in Malaysia.

And creativity and new product development and don't underestimate how hugely important that is in the market cap indices is a continued process of security inclusion and country inclusion and the like in which we work closely with the various countries around the world to see who's opening up.

And we go to our investors and go to those countries to be included.

Secondly, is all the innovation we're doing in ESG and factors and all of that, that represents, in a way, a different builds of the portfolio as well.

So that's the second part.

And the third part is services.

The services that we can provide to our clients especially our asset manager clients in terms of helping them build internal indices for managing their own processes internally so that sometimes people have talked about self-indexes being a threat.

It's actually a big opportunity for us because they can -- some clients that want to do their own indices themselves to build their own portfolios, they can rent our entire infrastructure to do that.

So there are lot of drivers of continued growth and profitability in this space.

That's a very helpful color.

I appreciate it.

And just as a follow-up you noted in the AUM drivers for the ETFs that we're seeing just a shift in demand towards U.S. equities now that the long-term outlook is very favorable for your products and services.

I guess, as you think about your expertise and factor investing and momentum, et cetera, are you guys expecting that in the near term though that they will likely continue to be kind of a skewed towards demand for U.S. equities relative to international?

Well, clearly it's a -- it's been a -- if you look at the historical context, it's a relatively new category for us.

We're really excited by it.

For sure, it's been a focus of ours, but the -- what we've seen successes have probably been at the high end of our expectations.

And I think we view it as kind of a flanking strategy to have this specialized content, this innovative content to then be more present in U.S. equities.

That's kind of if you like a product driven bottom-up, and then top down as we see asset owners, mandates when they look at their total portfolio based on an ACWI and then drill down and give out mandates -- we're seeing more and more of those going out with MSCI U.S.A.

benchmarks rather than some of the incumbents.

So we think that this is a space where people's perceptions are altering.

They are making decisions that they may not have made a few years ago, and we see the trend continuing.

So we're pretty excited about that.

And I think we've got increasing interest from many of our partners whether it's in ETFs or the derivatives areas to help support that because they love seeing this type of innovation and change as well.

So I think we're on a good trend, and we believe it will continue.

Our next question comes from Chris Shutler with William Blair.

Sounds like you’re spending a little more time thinking about M&A and inorganic opportunities.

Maybe just getting little more specific regarding how you think about rates of return and payback periods?

And fair to say the stuff that you would consider would likely be more of the tuck-in variety types of deal?

No, Chris.

I would not say we're spending more time on it.

I think we're spending the same amount of time.

What is changing though is that MSCI is an open architecture business.

We want to develop many, many more partnerships.

So obviously, we have great partnership with our clients.

We want to -- we have certain partnership with distribution channels and we want to do 360 partnership, we want to have many more partnership with suppliers of data.

So for example, in the private asset class space, we don't have to go buy the data or buy the company, we can have a partnership to use the data, for example.

We do that in fixed income indices.

We're not vertically integrated in fixed income indices.

We have partnerships that give us the terms and conditions and the valuated prices and like, right?

So we want partnerships in sideways in terms of technology providers, academic institutions to help build new models and the like.

So the area where we are really exploding in activity is in the area of those partnerships, which is -- they have kind of M&A components to them because you got to understand what the nature of the partnership is and what is the property and what are the royalties and how do you structure the agreement and the like?

But they don't have meaningful outlays of money and you have to look at returns the time and effort that you put into them and the like.

So we're not out there fishing for big transformative deals.

If somebody comes to us and say can you buy us and is strategic and is extremely low price.

We're not going to say no, right?

But we're not actively looking at any of those.

Okay.

And then speaking kind of big transformative deals, there was one announced this morning, with LSE and Refinitiv, just any high-level comments you can provide on impacts to MSCI good or bad from that deal?

So look, first, kudos to them, both of them and their owners because sounds like a great deal for them and obviously, the market reaction has been pretty positive.

We've had extensive relationship, some partnership with both parties in various areas, and every indication is that will continue and in some cases spread thin, for example.

So that's -- so the implications to that, to us, there's no change at all in our strategy.

Obviously, when this came out, we talked about it, we had a Board meeting earlier this week, obviously, because of the earnings release.

So we talked to our Board.

And there's no change in the strategy.

We are staying our course.

There is -- as a result of that, there's nothing that we say we have to go do or buy.

There may be some deals that happened as a result of that, some good deals, some shareholder destruction deals.

But we don't want to partake in any of those.

Our next question comes from Henry Chien with BMO.

I had a question around -- so there was a lot of cool products that you guys are building and it's very exciting all the different markets that you're going after whether it's ESG or factors.

I wanted to ask about some of the comments you made around prioritizing based off ROI or return on investments, just how are you kind of, beyond just the quantitative metrics, how do you actually think about, which like data products are -- how do you think about the returns whether it's the size of the market or like the ease of creation?

Just how do you kind of -- what's your framework for that?

Sure.

So first of all, for all of our mix, so for all of our ongoing projects, we track all of them, the expenses and the financial returns through our operating process, our monthly business reviews, et cetera.

We're constantly on top of those.

There's clearly a broad range, there are certain categories of content where we -- allowing for existing infrastructure, we can typically make a pretty good judgment about -- that we'll have a modest investment and a relatively fast return.

If it's some variation of existing content or tweaking methodologies or developing new ones, and clearly, when we're looking at more substantive investments, if we look at, let's say, our technology infrastructure, et cetera, we're clearly looking at both a broad market -- the broader market opportunity, the competition, those are the type of discussions that we have in our strategy meetings with the Board, et cetera.

So I think it's really kind of fit for purpose depending on the scale and the time horizon.

Linda, any other observations from your recent observations?

Sure.

Henry, I think it's appropriate to say the rigor and the discipline around us here is extraordinary and that will continue as we go forward.

There is a pretty remarkable array of really high return investments that we can make.

And let me just say a few more things about this, you've heard a lot about what we're doing in index with the new products, because we think getting to market first really is a huge advantage.

You've heard about the investments in indexed, in fixed income and in factors.

In ESG, I think we have touched on some of the things we're doing including technology and quality enhancements to help drive our coverage in that area, which has been returning very well for us and very quickly.

We probably didn't say enough about our go-to-market strategy.

We're exploring the wealth management area.

We're thinking about that and obviously, we're looking to make appropriate investments, as Henry had spoken about, in Asia, particularly, to drive our coverage capabilities there.

We were just looking at the run rate in Asia, is up 13% for the quarter year-over-year, which shows that, that's starting to pay off, which is really great.

And then lastly, investments in technology, in our technology team to drive all of that.

We've made some great new hires lately and I think we're really approaching a very exciting period of expansion and capability in the technology area.

So everything feels pretty good.

It's underpinned by the fact that we feel relatively good about the market tone and tenor now.

We're appropriately cautious but we are leaning forward here and we think there's a lot of great stuff to do.

And if I've missed anything, Henry is going to add it.

One last point in this is since this is such an important area and we've emphasized investments in the company.

All of our investments are not because we want to be bigger or have more people or even have more revenues or even have more profits.

All of those are means to an end.

All of our investments are here to create shareholder value.

And if the investment is going to make shareholder value, it doesn't go anywhere.

And that's why we focus on the returns on that investment.

We clearly have to -- you have to focus first on the strategy, that's something we want to be in or not, but once you're beyond that, what is the return, what's the payback.

The quicker the payback the better.

And importantly, what is the valuation of those.

Not every dollar EBITDA has the same value and therefore, we got to go to investments in which the results of the profit that bring -- that are brought out of that have high multiples.

So that's where we are, and we're very (inaudible) about that because that's what we're here to do.

Our next question comes from Craig Huber with Huber Research Partners.

Maybe, Henry, I'll start with you, if I could.

Just a broad question here.

What's worrying you?

Is it -- as CEO of your company right now the most and putting aside the obvious of a potential bear market down the road, big macro issue.

What's worrying you most right now?

A lot of people ask me that question, by the way.

And Craig and the answer that I give consistently across pretty much every aspect of it is that I feel fortunate enough, I'm privileged enough to be working at a company that has an opportunity to create -- to change the investment world and create enormous amount of value for our shareholders and our clients and the like.

And what worries me and keeps me up at night is how do I not mess that up?

Okay.

That was quick.

Appreciate that.

Very short and sweet.

Don't mess it up.

Don't mess it up.

Probably told that to Linda as well, right, when you hired her.

Congratulations, Linda.

Let me ask you about Analytics if I could.

The last 3 quarters, I guess, the organic growth there high-single digits.

It's been obviously a number of years coming there.

It's good to see and stuff.

Can you just briefly tell us what sort of change from your end to help accelerate growth to that?

How sustainable do you think it is to have growth there above mid-single digits for a while to come?

Yes, look, I think the nature of Analytics is that both the strategy, which I alluded to earlier, which is both the quality and innovation, the Analytics themselves helping our clients communicate with their clients, helping them build better portfolios, but also extremely importantly, to stress this again, helping them be more efficient.

This is a critical part of our offering and our goal is working, right?

Then another element of that is that, that means that we are as much, really, a service to them as a seller of products.

A lot of what we do is in the form of reporting in services that help them with their data management.

That is an increasing part of the Analytics run rate and continues to be so.

Again, we're repeating the critical point from earlier, the retention rate is up roughly 220 basis points.

That is an important indicator for us because it shows us that our clients are happier with what we're offering them.

So this is a, I think, a solid, steady progression, where we're focused on executing every day, every week, and if we continue to do so we should continue, this trajectory should continue.

And I'm particularly pleased that we have been, I would say, called this right in our communication to you and to the market, i.e., we never said that it was going to be rapid or dramatic in its change, but we said it would be consistent over time and that we would deliver, and that's the same message that we continue to give.

Our next question comes from Keith Housum with Northcoast Research.

I have a question for you.

I'm just trying to understand, as we look at EPS going out for the next year or so.

If I first want to understand the history, you guys have been able to move a lot of your employees from developed markets to emerging markets.

How critical to EPS growth over the past 2 or 3 years has that been?

And two, how much more opportunity is that as you look forward over the next year or 2?

So look, I think that in terms of the overall cost structure of the company, our major move and location in emerging market centers has been critical to the expansion of people and capabilities.

But more importantly, it's not just about the cost, it's about the great quality of these people and the ability that we have had to create new products and new services by operating in a lot of these places with a lot of more flexibility and expandability and the like.

So that has driven, I would say, the top line much more importantly than just the cost line, because when you aggregate the cost of all emerging markets even though it's 60-plus percent of employees is a lot lower relative to the high cost centers that we operate in.

I think -- so that's the specific answers.

Clearly, the EPS has been growing significantly over the years by the increase in revenue growth, by the expansion of the operating leverage, the expansion of the EBITDA margin by the leverage of the company, the significant buyback of shares and obviously the major drop in the tax rate that we've seen the last few years.

It's Linda.

The number is 63% of our employees in the emerging market centers.

And let me just give you a bit of color.

Having traveled to many of them over the past 3 months, I've been incredibly impressed by the quality of the people that we have in the emerging market centers, and it is remarkable that this company already has a well thought out and well-oiled structure to have emerging market centers really well integrated with the developing market centers.

This isn't a case where we have to go change all that, it's already done.

And that does help our costs, obviously, but as Henry said, it is more about the quality.

Going forward on EPS, I think Henry touched on, we have, as with most other U.S. companies, been the beneficiary of wind at our backs from the tax law changes, we'll see what happens as the final strokes are done in terms of implementation of those changes that were announced at beginning of this year, but that driver may weaken a little bit as we move forward.

We will continue to buy back shares opportunistically and we will keep that discipline, but obviously, we're optimistic as we move forward, but we're going to focus a little heavy -- more heavily on the operational part of things, because the tax turbocharging may fade a bit as we move into 2020, particularly.

Yes.

Got it.

Appreciate the color.

And just another quick question.

Earlier questions were obviously more focused on the analytical sales in the quarter.

Just remind us like how was the average size of your typical analytical sales?

We have that number in front of us.

Look, It's quite a broad range, is it -- is the simplest answer.

So typically the very low end of the range is like sort of $50,000, $75,000 for some simple equity type solutions, typically, and then at the higher end for large firm-wide multi-asset class solutions.

We're into the multiple millions, right?

So we can dig out the numbers, but the short answer is, it's a pretty broad range.

And a good part of them is -- the good part of the revenue comes from the bigger deals, but we have a really broad pipeline with a lot of different use cases and we can give you some more detail offline.

The other important part of that question is that as time has gone by, the high end of those sales, the high-end of the size of those sales has dramatically increased.

A big deal used to be, many years ago, $750,000, $800,000, a big deal today is multimillion.

And therefore, in every single quarter, if one of those slips from one -- from the last week of the quarter to the first week of the second -- of the next quarter, then you say, what happened to the Analytic sales, they are weaker or they are -- why they are so strong.

And so the best way to look at our Analytics sales is on a rolling quarter basis, because otherwise you're going to get a distorted picture of what's happening.

I'm showing no further questions at this time.

I would like to turn the call back over to Andrew Wiechmann for closing remarks.

Thank you, everyone, for joining us today.

As always, please do not hesitate to reach out if you do have additional questions.

Always happy to engage with all of you.

We look forward to keeping you posted on our progress, and have a great day.

Thank you so much.

Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes today's conference.

Thank you for joining, and have a wonderful day.