Lexicon Pharmaceuticals Inc (LXRX) 2015 Q2 法說會逐字稿

Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by and welcome to the Lexicon Pharmaceuticals second-quarter 2015 conference call. (Operator Instructions). As a reminder, this call is being recorded today, Friday, August 7, 2015. I would now like to turn the conference over to Mr. Chas Schultz, Senior Director of Finance and Communications. Sir, you may begin your conference.

Thank you very much. Good morning and welcome to the Lexicon Pharmaceutical second-quest 2015 conference call. I am Chas Schultz and with me today are Lonnel Coats, Lexicon's President and Chief Executive Officer; Dr. Pablo Lapuerta, Lexicon's Executive Vice President and Chief Medical Officer; Jeff Wade, Lexicon's Executive Vice President of Corporate and Administrative Affairs and Chief Financial Officer; and John Northcott, Lexicon's Vice President of Marketing, Commercial Strategy and Operations.

We expect that you have seen a copy of our earnings press release that was distributed this morning. During this call we will review the information provided in the release, provide an update on our clinical programs, and then use the remainder of our time to answer your questions.

If you would like to view the slides for today's call, please access the Lexicon website at www.lexpharma.com. You'll see a link on the homepage for today's webcast.

Before we begin I would like to state that we will be making forward-looking statements, including statements relating to Lexicon's clinical development of telotristat etiprate and sotagliflozin. These statements may include characterizations of the result of and projected timing of clinical trials of such compounds and the potential therapeutic and commercial potentials of such compounds.

This call may also contain forward-looking statements relating to Lexicon's growth and future operating results, discovery and development of products, strategic alliances, and intellectual property; as well as other matters that are not historical facts or information.

Various risks may cause Lexicon's actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied in such forward-looking statements. These risks include uncertainties related to the timing and results of clinical trials and preclinical studies of our drug candidates; our dependence upon strategic alliances and ability to enter into additional collaboration and license agreements; our ability to obtain patent protection for our discoveries; limitations imposed by patents owned or controlled by third parties; and the requirements of substantial funding to conduct our drug development and commercialization activities.

For a list and a description of the risks and uncertainties that we face, please see the reports we have filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. I will now turn the call over to Mr. Coats.

Thank you, Chas, and thank you, everyone, for joining us on today's call. Let me quickly go through today's agenda. I'm sure there will be a lot of new investors to the Lexicon story on today's call, so we will take a little bit -- talk a little bit about Lexicon before recapping the results from our TELESTAR trial. We will then discuss the second-quarter financial results and open the call to questions.

Let me start out by thanking the extraordinary men and women at Lexicon Pharmaceuticals who believe very strongly in translating our science into human benefit. This belief has been unwavering for over 20 years and with this week's telotristat etiprate results has been strongly validated.

If I could level set for those who may be -- may not be familiar with the Lexicon story, Lexicon Pharmaceuticals was built on a strong scientific foundation that is comprised of multiple high-value drug targets that were internally discovered from a comprehensive study of nearly 5,000 drugable genes.

Today we will focus on our two lead clinical candidates, telotristat etiprate for carcinoid syndrome and sotagliflozin for type I diabetes, both of which were internally discovered and developed at Lexicon.

What is unique about these innovations is that each candidate has the potential to change standard of care and create significant stakeholder value. That is because both telotristat etiprate and sotagliflozin serve markets characterized by significant unmet needs.

There are very few pharmaceutical innovations in these disease categories and there are even fewer or limited choices today. Our strategy is straightforward. Both compounds were discovered and developed by Lexicon and therefore we intend to commercialize both independently in the United States because we believe this will provide the greatest return for our shareholders over time.

We will introduce these innovations to the rest of the world by leveraging strategic partnerships that will allow us to reach the most patients throughout the world. We already have partnered telotristat etiprate with Ipsen outside the United States and Japan, and more than likely we will seek an ex-US partner for sotagliflozin as we advance it through Phase 3.

On the next slide, it's really exciting because this week marked a tremendous milestone for Lexicon in our most advanced program, telotristat etiprate, which met the primary endpoint of its pivotal TELESTAR Phase 3 study. Dr. Lapuerta will go through these results in detail shortly.

What I would like to say -- that with these results we are one step closer to getting this novel treatment approved, to getting a major treatment advanced to patients in need, and to being able to generate revenue for our shareholders.

Telotristat etiprate has the potential to be the first treatment innovation in 16 years for cancer patients with carcinoid syndrome. With the Phase 3 telotristat etiprate data, we have validated the gene science approach we began two decades ago.

The decoding of the human genome inspired many companies to search for promising drug targets in a new way. But what wasn't immediately apparent was how challenging the process was going to be and, when others wavered, Lexicon stayed the course. And that dedication is what allowed us to pioneer the precision medicines we will be talking to you about today.

Before Lexicon, no one thought that you could safely target the excess serotonin production that triggers carcinoid syndrome, a serious and debilitating condition affecting thousands of cancer patients, without impacting the beneficial serotonin circulation in the brain.

Through Lexicon's unique approach to gene science, which is based on novel prize-winning technology, we discovered that there were two genes that control serotonin in the body, not one that was previously thought. And that serotonin synthesis could be safely reduced in the body without impacting serotonin in the brain.

This discovery led Lexicon to create telotristat etiprate, a highly precise medicine that works at the source of carcinoid syndrome to improve the current standard of care. We have demonstrated that telotristat etiprate has the potential to safely and effectively treat carcinoid patients who have not been able to adequately -- be adequately controlled or control their symptoms with the current standard of care alone.

With these results we are now ready to begin working with the FDA to get this cutting-edge treatment to patients as quickly as possible, supported by an exceptional commercial infrastructure that we are rapidly building.

We are confident that telotristat etiprate will be the first of many successful discoveries borne from Lexicon's unparalleled study and comprehensive understanding of gene function. As I mentioned before, telotristat etiprate is not a one-off but rather the first of what we believe will be many successful candidates to emerge from Lexicon's deep pipeline.

The second candidate in late stage clinical development is sotagliflozin, our first-in-class dual SGLT1 and SGLT2 inhibitor for type I diabetes. Like telotristat etiprate, sotagliflozin has the potential to change the standard of care for patients with type I diabetes. These patients haven't had a non-insulin-based pharmaceutical innovation of significant impact in more than a century.

Sotagliflozin approaches type I diabetes in an entirely new way by targeting two proteins, SGLT1 and SGLT2, which are responsible for glucose regulation. These target approach has shown to improve glycemic control and reduce the need for mealtime insulin, which will be a significant advance for the majority of patients who still fail to achieve recommended glucose levels with insulin alone.

The potential of sotagliflozin is already supported by 16 clinical studies that have enrolled more than 600 patients, and we are remarkably confident we will continue to achieve positive results in the clinic with this innovative treatment.

Earlier this year we began enrolling our Phase 3 critical trials for sotagliflozin as well as our Phase 2 clinical trial, which we are conducting in collaboration with JDRF. Patient enrollment has been robust and in line with expectations and we are pleased with the tremendous progress we have made in just a few short months. We continue to expect results from these trials in 2016.

As we've shown, both telotristat etiprate and sotagliflozin offer an opportunity for major advances in patient care in areas of high unmet need and limited recent pharmaceutical innovation. We strongly believe these assets hold significant value for patients and shareholders. With that, I would turn the call over to Dr. Pablo Lapuerta, Lexicon's Chief Medical Officer, to discuss the results for TELESTAR.

Thank you very much, Lonnel. It is a pleasure to present the TELESTAR top-line results; they represent a lot of dedication for many physicians, caregivers, and patients. On the next slide, about TELESTAR, let me provide you a general overview of the clinical trial design.

TELESTAR was designed as a single pivotal Phase 3 study for its orphan indication, testing telotristat etiprate's 250 and 500 milligrams doses compared to placebo on top of the standard of care continued somatostatin analogue therapy. This is in a population whose symptoms of carcinoid syndrome were not adequately controlled on the somatostatin analogue therapy alone.

Our objective was to assess the efficacy of telotristat etiprate in reducing bowel movement frequency. The top-line results applied to the 12-week double-blind period. Please note that for 36 more weeks, patients continued into an open label extension and many patients are in that extension right now.

A little bit more about the TELESTAR trial design on the next slide. TELESTAR enrolled 135 patients, making it one of the largest studies ever done in patients with carcinoid syndrome. It was a global program. There were 16 sites in the US at leading centers and many in Europe, Israel, Australia, and Canada.

The main inclusion criteria, all patients had metastatic neuroendocrine brain tumors. They were all currently on somatostatin analogue therapy and they continued that during the trial. The symptoms were severe as reflected by the diarrhea with more than four bowel movements per day.

Next slide, the primary active measure of telotristat etiprate was a change from baseline in the average number of daily bowel movements over the 12-week double-blind period. Another primary objective was to address safety, examining the incidence of adverse events.

Secondary outcome measures include a change from baseline in urinary 5-HIAA, a marker of serotonin synthesis. Another secondary endpoint was the number of cutaneous flushing episodes, and the third one was a change from baseline in abdominal pain.

Next slide, TELESTAR successfully met its primary endpoint. Both doses, 250 and 500 milligrams, showed statistically significant reductions from baseline compared to the standard of care. The P values were less than 0.001. These are very low P values and they speak to the robustness of the results. This was a level of robustness we had hoped to achieve.

Not only were there low P values, but robustness as evident in the demonstration of two different doses, both meeting the standard of care. And we also see it in sensitivity analysis when looking at different other ways of examining bowel movement treatments.

On the next slide, one of the analyses we did of bowel movement frequency was clinically important. We prespecified with regulatory agencies that a 30% reduction in bowel movement frequency is clinically meaningful and we proposed that we would examine the proportion of patients achieving that reduction.

We did that with this durability of response definition. Not only did patients need to achieve at least a 30% reduction in bowel movement frequency, but they needed to do it for over half the days of the study period. The response rates were 44% in the 250 milligram arm, 42% in the 500 milligram arm, and only 20% from the standard of care.

This is more than a doubling of response to telotristat etiprate. So we see the statistically significant and clinically meaningful reductions that we needed to see. And in that durable response definition, we saw statistical significance again for both doses versus the standard of care.

What does this mean in terms of the change from baseline in bowel movement frequency? We have that on the next slide. The 250 milligram dose reduced bowel movement frequency at week 12 by 29% compared to baseline. At week 12 the 500 milligram group was at a 35% reduction compared to baseline. The standard of care was only a 17% reduction compared to baseline.

On the next slide, the safety experienced in telotristat etiprate was reassuring for both doses. We examined the proportion of patients with treatment-emergent adverse events, serious adverse events, and discontinuation due to adverse events, and they were similar in all three treatment arms.

The tolerability of the 250 milligram dose was especially strong, similar to placebo, and somewhat better than 500 milligrams with respect to areas of gastrointestinal discomfort and mood. Further proof of safety and tolerability are ongoing. There are many patients in the long-term extension who've taken the 500 milligram dose and they're continuing with therapy and experience has been a positive one.

Overall we are seeing for both doses the safety and efficacy we need to support an NDA filing. I will now turn the call over to Jeff Wade.

Thank you, Pablo. I will provide a brief financial update. As indicated in our press release today, we had revenues for the 2015 second quarter of $0.4 million, a decrease from $0.7 million in the prior year period. Our revenues of $2.2 million for the first half of 2015 increased from $1 million in the prior year period.

Our research and development expenses for the 2015 second quarter decreased 2% to $20.8 million from $21.2 million in the prior year period. Our R&D expenses of $41.6 million for the first half of 2015 reflected an 8% decrease from $45.1 million in the prior year period.

In connection with our acquisition of Symphony Icon, we made an initial estimate of the fair value of our liability for the base and contingent payments. Changes in this liability based on the development of the programs and the time until those payments are expected to be made are recorded in our consolidated statements of operations.

The associated decrease in fair value of Symphony Icon purchase liability was $12,000 in the second quarter and the liability increased by $1.7 million in the six months ended June 30, 2015.

Our general and administrative expenses for the 2015 second quarter were $6.3 million, an increase of 22% from $5.2 million in the prior year period. The increase was primarily due to increased consulting costs in preparation for the commercialization of telotristat etiprate. Our G&A expenses of $12 million for the first half of 2015 reflected an 11% increase from $10.8 million for the prior year period.

Our net loss for the 2015 second quarter was $28.1 million or $0.27 per share compared to a net loss of $26 million or $0.35 per share in the prior year period. Our net loss for the first half of 2015 was $56.2 million or $0.54 per share compared to a net loss of $56.9 million or $0.77 per share for the corresponding period in 2014.

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, our net loss included non-cash stock-based compensation expense of $1.8 million and $3.7 million respectively. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, net loss included $1.8 million and $4.1 million respectively.

In May 2015, we completed a 1 for 7 reverse stock split. All references to common shares and per share data for all periods presented in this earnings call have been adjusted to give effect to this reverse stock split.

Finally, as of June 30, 2015 we had $282.5 million in cash and investments as compared to $315.1 million as of March 31, 2015 and $339.3 million as of December 31, 2014.

On the next slide I will update our forward-looking financial guidance for 2015. We continue to expect contractual revenues from existing agreements in 2015 to be around $3 million. We continue to expect that our operating expenses in 2015 will be in the range of $130 million to $140 million. Non-cash expenses are expected to be approximately $16 million of this total including $7 million of stock-based compensation, $8 million in increase in fair value of Symphony Icon purchase liability, and $1 million in depreciation and amortization.

We continue to manage our cash responsibly and now expect our 2015 net cash used in operations to be in the range of $140 million to $150 million, which is a decrease from our previous guidance of $150 million to $160 million. These operating expense and net cash use expectations include the cost of the commercialization ramp-up and an expeditious filing of the NDA for telotristat etiprate as well as full-scale Phase 3 commercial trials -- or Phase 3 clinical trials for sotagliflozin in type I diabetes.

As far as revenues are concerned, net cash use expectations take into account cash received under existing contractual relationships only. We expect our cash and investments to take us through the series of milestones we have defined: data from TELESTAR now received, our planned NDA filing, and upon approval commercial launch of telotristat etiprate, data from our JDRF study of sotagliflozin and from our Phase 3 top-line results for sotagliflozin, taking us into 2017. I will now turn the call back to Lonnel.

Thank you, Jeff. I just want to make note of a correction on slide 15, on cash and investments it should say as of June 30, 2015, not March 31, just to make a note.

Let me just sum up by saying that this will be a transformative year for Lexicon. Telotristat etiprate and sotagliflozin represent the tip of the iceberg of a deep, rich pipeline that should continue to bear similar results for years to come.

As we've stated, we have completed our pivotal Phase 3 study to TELESTAR and we look forward to sharing more data on this trial at an upcoming scientific conference. NDA filing preparations and commercial preparations for this drug is very much underway and, in addition to our Phase 3 and Phase 2 clinical studies that are progressing nicely for sotagliflozin, we are doing all the activities necessary to make sure that we are being responsible with how we spend our cash.

We have over the course of the next 12 to 18 months a number of significant catalysts that Jeff has mentioned. On the heels of this Phase 3 top-line results we're moving expeditiously for NDA filing, targeted filing in the first quarter of next year.

We also expect to have data from the JDRF study during the first quarter of next year as well as the data from the Phase 3 study in type I diabetes toward the end of next year.

If we obtain priority review, we have the opportunity to potentially launch telotristat etiprate and have our first product on the market by the end of next year. So it is indeed a transformative year for Lexicon.

So with that being said, I will close as I always do. I want to again thank you for taking the opportunity to hear the Lexicon story and we will open up the floor for questions.

(Operator Instructions). Jessica Fye.

Thanks for taking my questions. I guess we've talked a lot about telotristat this week. Can you remind us or maybe walk us through how you think about peak sales for sotagliflozin? And then I know you commented on the timelines for data, but just anything on when we could hear enrollment for the Phase 2 JDRF study or the Phase 3s?

Thank you very much. I'll have Jeff take that question.

So we think that sotagliflozin is a potential $1 billion plus drug in type I diabetes, that is the opportunity for that. And we will keep people updated with the timing of the enrollment of that study and will announce the enrollment when it is completed.

And just to add on, there's no doubt in my mind you have 1.1 million adults living with type I diabetes. Three quarters of them are not meeting their ADA guidelines. And in fact, as we look at those who are controlling it, they are reporting they're having a difficult time just holding themselves where they are with just using insulin alone.

So I think it's a remarkable market with a remarkable opportunity for us to add on to standard of care. Insulin always will be at the baseline care for a type I diabetic patient, but there's a better way to control the disease without the anxiety of trying to manage it with injections.

So, we think we will indeed offer a better advantage and a better way to treat type I diabetics than what is offered up today. And if we should be successful, to Jeff's point, there's no question this is over a $1 billion opportunity.

Got it, thanks. And maybe just one follow-up on that. Can you remind us of the kind of competitive landscape in type I? Are you seeing the other SGLT2s go into this space?

Yes, they have talked about going into this space, but I will just say they have talked about going into this space. What I would say is more about what Lexicon's activities are. We believe very strongly, regardless of who comes into this space, they will still be missing the dual mechanism, particularly the SGLT1 mechanism that we think is the differentiation for a type I patient a postprandial basis.

So regardless of who comes, we will have the market advantage in terms of having clinical meaningfulness. That's one. Two, because we are a very, very focused organization, we believe we'll be first. So I think we will offer the value of being first and for sure be best once we come to market.

Okay, thank you.

Alan Carr.

Thanks for taking my questions. Wondering if you could comment a bit about -- you gave guidance for the rest of the year. Can you comment a bit about how that's going to be distributed? You started the Phase 3 already but it didn't look like R&D moved up much.

And then also with respect to sotagliflozin, what if any other work is going to be needed in parallel with the Phase 3 trial? Any supportive studies, preclinical or clinical, that you will be doing over the next year and a half?

Thank you, Alan. I'll turn that one over to Jeff.

So, I'll answer the second question first. We're doing all of the activities that would be required for us to file in parallel with Phase 3 and those activities are underway as we progress the Phase 3 program.

We're going to end up in ramping up some expenses over the course of the balance of this year. So the expenses over the last couple of quarters are going to be higher than the expenses we've had in the first couple of quarters, so in terms of distribution as we get that enrollment going up full speed. So, it should be reasonably evenly distributed among the last couple quarters of this year.

Okay, thank you. I guess can you outline some of those things, activities that you are running in parallel to the sotagliflozin trial?

Well, we just have additional -- among them we have the Phase 2 JDRF study, which is probably one of the more significant ones, and that's in patients with high A1C and between ages 18 and 30. And then we also are finishing up some additional Phase 1 studies that are associated -- that are needed for us to be able to file, just looking at some of the last things that we need to complete.

We have made good progress on those already, so we expect -- and as we have noted previously, we've already conducted 16 clinical trials of this compound, so we expect those to go well and to be completed as scheduled to allow us to file NDA within the time frame that we're talking about.

And then the last thing, can you remind me the patent life for both drugs?

They both run into the late 2020s without accounting for a patent term extension. So, the second half of the 2020s.

All right, thanks very much.

Liana Moussatos.

Thank you for taking my questions. So with telotristat etiprate you are going to go for approval for both the 250 and the 500 milligrams doses. Do you anticipate the label will recommend starting patients on 250 and titrating up to 500? Or are there different patient situations that patients would directly go to 500?

And then my second question has to do with the SGLT2 inhibitors in the trials in type I diabetics, some of whom are having diabetic ketoacidosis. Have you seen anything like that? And do you think the SGLT1 part of your mechanism might reduce that risk?

I will have Pablo start with the second part of your question.

All right, so the second part is about sotagliflozin and diabetic ketoacidosis. Yes, so with sotagliflozin we are encouraged by our progress with the Phase 3 program so far from a safety standpoint and in terms of execution and enrollment. And when you talk about diabetic ketoacidosis, it's a part of type I diabetes. About 5% of patients with type I diabetes have an episode of ketoacidosis every year.

We have been reassured with our safety experience. You asked, though, as well is could the SGLT1 mechanism of action be differentiating? And yes, it could with respect to diabetic ketoacidosis for several reasons and including that the SGLT1 mechanism of sotagliflozin provides an increase in GLP-1. And GLP-1 may have a role in protecting from diabetic ketoacidosis.

Also I think, Pablo, we would add that the level of urinary or UGE with sotagliflozin is much less than with their SGLT2s. So when you have that much glucose depletion, that also can lead to DKA. You have a lot less of that with sotagliflozin. So we think that will be a material advantage and hope that the studies will prove that to be true.

If I can go to your first question around the dose, these things will be discussed with the agency and we will get more of an answer as we finish up the 36-week extension trial for the 500 milligrams dose. However, the agency will always ask and start the lowest dose, I believe. And so, how it gets titrated or if it's done by subpopulation we don't know at this moment until we have that discussion with the agency.

But for certain what I would say is that 250 milligrams dose is quite extraordinary. You have a robust response and you have a very good safety profile. And more than likely I think that will be the dose we start with and could be the prevailing dose.

Thank you very much.

Cristina Ghenoiu.

Thank you for taking my question. One on telotristat. I was wondering for the 36- week extension, (technical difficulty) of the anticipated (inaudible) decrease in volume of (technical difficulty) from baseline from deficiencies to be underactive there?

So, I'm not sure we completely understand your question. There's a little bit of interference on the line. But we are -- so, just to be clear, the open label extension, all patients are rolling into active treatment, so they will have the 500 milligrams dose in addition to the standard of care. We do expect to -- probably for the placebo patients to improve on that basis as they go on telotristat etiprate based on the results we've seen so far if that was your question.

And I was wondering about those who used to be on the active arm, will they see further -- do you expect to see further improvement from baseline compared to week 12?

We don't have that data, and we won't until the study is completed. But we have seen -- I will say that we have had patients -- a very high proportion of patients roll over to the extension. We have had a high proportion of patients stay on the extension. And our historical experience with -- in Phase 2 was that patients continued to benefit from telotristat etiprate over a long period of time. We had patients who have been on this drug for four years plus at this point.

I think in the absence of the data I don't think we want to make any conclusions until we have that data. But to Jeff's point, the vast majority, and I think the number -- and the team will correct me -- 86% of the patients rolled over into active drug. That is a very big vote of confidence for the active drug and we expect that patients will continue to receive benefit. At what level of benefit? We will see once the study is complete.

Okay, thank you. And I was just curious, are there any other indications that may be suitable for telotristat to be used in?

Excellent question. We think so and we're working on that at this moment. Once you have had these kinds of results and when you start to look at the PPH mechanism, you start to think about other areas that certainly we can apply this, particularly in the area of cancer.

But that's the work that we're going to do next and when we are ready to talk about exactly where we would go next with it, we will certainly communicate that back out. But you are absolutely correct, there is another opportunity or two that we can advance these compounds.

Thank you. And lastly, I was just curious about the conferences that you may be targeting. Any in particular (multiple speakers) to release the data?

Yes, conferences, so there is a conference in Europe called ESMO, which I believe will be this September. Then there is the NETs conference, which is made up of physicians here in North America that treat neuroendocrine tumors, that will be in October. And then there's ASCO GI, which I believe is the first of next year. So all three conferences we are targeting with these data.

Thank you very much.

(Operator Instructions). Stephen Willey.

Thanks for taking the question. I think I heard in your opening comments kind of the mention of an ex-US partnership for sotagliflozin. And I just wanted to make sure that you guys are thinking about that as a post-data versus a pre-data event. Just wondering if you could maybe provide some color on that.

Stephen, I think as we advance sotagliflozin into late Phase 3, I fully expect us to have substantive discussions about the rest of the world. I think the opportunity for us best to have those conversations will be beyond having the JDRF data on study 204. So it could be either way of the pivotal study, but I don't think it will be before we have the 204 data.

Okay, and then I think you had also talked about a lot of the work the Company has done on some of these first-in-class targets and I know a lot of those are still sitting on the shelf somewhere in the bowels of Lexicon. So I'm just kind of wondering if there's any objective our strategy here in place to maybe to try to monetize some of those earlier drug discovery efforts, thanks.

Very good question and let me first start off with the answer is yes. We've had a long-standing relationship, as we announced earlier, with BMS where we found a target that we're going to advance into the clinic (technical difficulty) shortly for pain, for neuropathic pain and I think that's exciting.

We have other discussions that we are having with other organizations on how we can help them around the target work that they are looking to do, whether to avoid things or to accelerate things, and those conversations are ongoing.

But as you may know, we also have a search out for an RD head that will help again to crystallize an overarching strategy for pulling our library forward. Both will work with academia as well as work with other pharma companies to properly characterize that entire library.

And that does conclude today's question-and-answer session. I will turn it back over to our host for any closing remarks.

Well again, thank you very much for joining us this morning. As I've stated before, this is a remarkable -- remarkably exciting time for Lexicon. It is a transformative year for all the new shareholders who've come onto Lexicon. I think you've come on at a great time.

For all those who have been with us, I think this transformative year will be a very high value-based year for us. And so, thank you for believing in Lexicon and we look forward to the next conference call.

Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for joining us today. This concludes today's conference call. You may now disconnect.